Intentions, an integral part of the mental state of an agent, play an important role in

In recent years research in the planning community has moved increasingly towards application of planners to realistic problems involving both time and many types of resources. For example, interest in planning demonstrated by the space research community has inspired work in observation scheduling, planetary rover exploration and spacecraft control domains. Other temporal and resource-intensive domains including logistics planning, plant control and manufacturing have also helped to focus the community on the modelling and reasoning issues that must be confronted to make planning technology meet the challenges of application. The International Planning Competitions have acted as an important motivating force behind the progress that has been made in planning since 1998. The third competition (held in 2002) set the planning community the challenge of handling time and numeric resources. This necessitated the development of a modelling language capable of expressing temporal and numeric properties of planning domains. In this paper we describe the language, pddl2.1, that was used in the competition. We describe the syntax of the language, its formal semantics and the validation of concurrent plans. We observe that pddl2.1 has considerable modelling power — exceeding the capabilities of current planning technology — and presents a number of important challenges to the research community.

This paper considers the semantics of the agent communication language KQML. By using this language for communication, agents will be able to request and provide services. Indeed, numerous projects have shown how the language can profitably support interoperation among distributed agents. However, before becoming a widely-accepted standard, it would be worthwhile to examine the language in detail, especially the semantical issues it raises. This paper identifies numerous difficulties with the language, and an attempt is made to point to their resolution. The paper illustrates the kind of semantics we believe to be necessary to characterize agent communication languages, identifies an important adequacy condition "compositionality" and shows how to compose a question from a request and an inform. Finally, the paper discusses possible impacts to be felt on various KQML decisions from the semantical issues raised here.

. The paper is concerned with the succinct axiomatization and ecient deduction of non-change, within McCarthy and Hayes' Situation Calculus. The idea behind the proposed approach is this: suppose that in a room containing a man, a robot and a cat as the only potential agents, the only action taken by the man within a certain time interval is to walk from one place to another, while the robot's only actions are to pick up a box containing the (inactive) cat and carry it from its initial place to another. We wish to prove that a certain object (such as the cat, or the doormat) did not change color. We reason that the only way it could have changed color is for the man or the robot to have painted or dyed it. But since these are not among the actions which actually occurred, the color of the object is unchanged. Thus we need no frame axioms to the eect that walking and carrying leave colors unchanged (which is in general false in multi-agent worlds), and no default schema that properties change only when we can prove they do (which is in general false in incompletely known worlds). Instead we use explanationclosure axioms specifying all primitive actions which can produce a given type of change within the setting of interest. A method similar to this has been proposed by Andrew Haas for singleagent, serial worlds. The contribution of the present paper lies in 1 showing (1) that such methods do indeed encode non-change succinctly, (2) are independently motivated, (3) can be used to justify highly ecient methods of inferring non-change, specically the \sleeping dog" strategy of STRIPS, and (4) can be extended to simple multiagent worlds with concurrent actions. An ultimate limitation may lie in the lack of a uniform strategy for deciding what ...

A new domain-independent knowledge-based inference structure is presented, specific to the task of abstracting higher-level concepts from time-stamped data. The framework includes a model of time, parameters, events, and contexts. A formal specification of a domains temporal-abstraction knowledge supports acquisition, maintenance, reuse, and sharing of that knowledge.

: In certain areas of artificial intelligence there is need to represent continuous change and to make statements that are interpreted with respect to time intervals rather than time points. To this end we develop a modal temporal logic based on time intervals, a logic which can be viewed as a generalization of pointbased modal temporal logic. We discuss related logics, give an intuitive presentation of the new logic, and define its formal syntax and semantics. We make no assumption about the underlying nature of time, allowing it to be discrete (such as the natural numbers) or continuous (such as the rationals or the reals), linear or branching, complete (such as the reals) or not (such as the rationals). We show, however, that there are formulas in the logic that allow us to distinguish all these situations. We also give a translation of our logic into first-order logic, which allows us to apply some results on first-order logic to our modal one. Finally, we consider the difficulty o...

This paper describes the O-Plan2 agent oriented architecture and describes the communication which takes place between planning and execution monitoring agents built upon the architecture. Separate modules of such a system are identified along with internal and external interface specifications that form a part of the design. Time constraints, resource usage, object selection and condition/effect causal constraints are handled as an integral part of the overall system structure by treating specialised constraint management as supporting the core decision making components in the architecture. A close coupling of planning and time or resource scheduling is therefore possible within a system employing an activity based plan representation. 2 History and Technical Influences

The needs of a real-time reasoner situated in an environment may make it appropriate to view error-correction and non-monotonicity as much the same thing. This has led us to formulate situated (or step) logic, an approach to reasoning in which the formalism has a kind of real-time self-reference that affects the course of deduction itself. Here we seek to motivate this as a useful vehicle for exploring certain issues in commonsensereasoning. In particular, a chief drawback of more traditional logics is avoided: from a contradiction we do not have all wffs swamping the (growing) conclusion set. Rather, we seek potentially inconsistent, but nevertheless useful, logics where the real-time self-referential feature allows a direct contradiction to be spotted and corrective action taken, as part of the same system of reasoning. Some specific inference mechanisms for real-time default reasoning are suggested, notably a form of introspection relevant to default reasoning. Special treatment of ...

issues remain essentially the same. One of the most crucial problems in any computer system that involves representing the world is the representation of time. This includes applications such as databases, simulation, expert systems and applications of Artificial Intelligence in general. In this brief paper, I will give a survey of the basic techniques available for representing time, and then talk about temporal reasoning in a general setting as needed in AI applications. Quite different representations of time are usable depending on the assumptions that can be made about the temporal information to be represented. The most crucial issue is the degree of certainty one can assume. Can one assume that a time stamp can be assigned to each event, or barring that, that the events are fully ordered? Or can we only assume that a partial ordering of events is known? Can events be simultaneous? Can they overlap in time and yet not be simultaneous? If they are not instantaneous, do we know the durations of events? Different answers to each of these questions allow very different representations of time. I. Representations Based on Dating Schemes A good representation of time for instantaneous events, if it is possible, is using an absolute dating system. This involves time stamping each event with an absolute real-time, say taken off the system clock

AI planning agents are goal-directed: success is measured in terms of whether or not an input goal is satisfied, and the agent's computational processes are driven by those goals. A decision-theoretic agent, on the other hand, has no explicit goals--- success is measured in terms of its preferences or a utility function that respects those preferences. The two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses. Symbolic planning provides a computational theory of plan generation, but under unrealistic assumptions: perfect information about and control over the world and a restrictive model of actions and goals. Decision theory provides a normative model of choice under uncertainty, but offers no guidance as to how the planning options are to be generated. This paper unifies the two approaches to planning by describing utility models that support rational decision making while retaining the goal information needed to support plan generation. We develop an extended model of goals tha...