Results 1  10
of
176
Complexity and Expressive Power of Logic Programming
, 1997
"... This paper surveys various complexity results on different forms of logic programming. The main focus is on decidable forms of logic programming, in particular, propositional logic programming and datalog, but we also mention general logic programming with function symbols. Next to classical results ..."
Abstract

Cited by 299 (56 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper surveys various complexity results on different forms of logic programming. The main focus is on decidable forms of logic programming, in particular, propositional logic programming and datalog, but we also mention general logic programming with function symbols. Next to classical results on plain logic programming (pure Horn clause programs), more recent results on various important extensions of logic programming are surveyed. These include logic programming with different forms of negation, disjunctive logic programming, logic programming with equality, and constraint logic programming. The complexity of the unification problem is also addressed.
Logic Programming and Knowledge Representation
 Journal of Logic Programming
, 1994
"... In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc tion, and some modal operators and sh ..."
Abstract

Cited by 233 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc tion, and some modal operators and show how each of the added features extends the representational power of the language.
Preferred Answer Sets for Extended Logic Programs
 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
, 1998
"... In this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for extended logic programs can be suitably modified to handle prioritized programs. In such programs an ordering on the program rules is used to express preferences. We show how this ordering can be used ..."
Abstract

Cited by 144 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for extended logic programs can be suitably modified to handle prioritized programs. In such programs an ordering on the program rules is used to express preferences. We show how this ordering can be used to define preferred answer sets and thus to increase the set of consequences of a program. We define a strong and a weak notion of preferred answer sets. The first takes preferences more seriously, while the second guarantees the existence of a preferred answer set for programs possessing at least one answer set. Adding priorities
An Algorithm to Evaluate Quantified Boolean Formulae and its Experimental Evaluation
 Journal of Automated Reasoning
, 1999
"... The high computational complexity of advanced reasoning tasks such as reasoning about knowledge and planning calls for efficient and reliable algorithms for reasoning problems harder than NP. In this paper we propose Evaluate, an algorithm for evaluating Quantified Boolean Formulae, a language that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 142 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The high computational complexity of advanced reasoning tasks such as reasoning about knowledge and planning calls for efficient and reliable algorithms for reasoning problems harder than NP. In this paper we propose Evaluate, an algorithm for evaluating Quantified Boolean Formulae, a language that extends propositional logic in a way such that many advanced forms of propositional reasoning, e.g., circumscription, can be easily formulated as evaluation of a QBF. Algorithms for evaluation of QBFs are suitable for the experimental analysis on a wide range of complexity classes, a property not easily found in other formalisms. Evaluate is based on a generalization of the DavisPutnam procedure for SAT, and is guaranteed to work in polynomial space. Before presenting the algorithm, we discuss several abstract properties of QBFs that we singled out to make it more efficient. We also discuss various options that were investigated about heuristics and data structures, and report the main res...
Tractable Reasoning via Approximation
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1995
"... Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 104 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantically wellfounded logic for approximate reasoning, which is justifiable from the intuitive point of view, and to provide fast algorithms for dealing with it even when using expressive languages. We also want our logic to be useful to perform approximate reasoning in different contexts. We define a method for the approximation of decision reasoning problems based on multivalued logics. Our work expands and generalizes in several directions ideas presented by other researchers. The major features of our technique are: 1) approximate answers give semantically clear information about the problem at hand; 2) approximate answers are easier to compute than answers to the original problem; 3) approxim...
A Deductive System for Nonmonotonic Reasoning
 In
, 1997
"... Abstract. Disjunctive Deductive Databases (DDDBs) functionfree disjunctive logic programs with negation in rule bodies allowed have been recently recognized as a powerful tool for knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. Much research as been spent on issues like semantics and comple ..."
Abstract

Cited by 104 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Disjunctive Deductive Databases (DDDBs) functionfree disjunctive logic programs with negation in rule bodies allowed have been recently recognized as a powerful tool for knowledge representation and commonsense reasoning. Much research as been spent on issues like semantics and complexity of DDDBs, but the important area of implementing DDDBs has been less addressed so far. However, a thorough investigation thereof is a basic requirement for building systems which render previous foundational work on DDDBs useful for practice. This paper presents the architecture ofa DDDB system currently developed at TU Vienna in the FWF project P11580MAT '~A Query System for Disjunctive Deductive Databases". 1 In t roduct ion The study of integrating databases with logic programming opened in the past the field of deductive databases. Basically, a deductive database is a functionfree logic program, i.e., a datalog program (possibly extended with negation). Several advanced eductive database systems utilize logic programming and extensions thereof or querying relational databases, e.g. [14, 21, 24]. The need for representing disjunctive (or incomplete) information led to Disjunctive Deductive Databases (DDDBs) [18]. They can be seen as functionfree disjunctive logic programs, i.e., disjunctive datalog programs [19, 12]. DDDBs are nowadays widely recognized as a valuable tool for knowledge representation a d reasoning [1, 17, 30, 13, 19]. The strong interest in enhancing deductive databases by disjunction is documented by a number of publications (cf. [17]) and special workshops dedicated to this subject (cf. [30]). An important merit of DDDBs over normal (i.e., disjunctionfree) logic programming is its capability to model incomplete knowledge [1, 17].
Compositional Shape Analysis by means of BiAbduction
, 2009
"... This paper describes a compositional shape analysis, where each procedure is analyzed independently of its callers. The analysis uses an abstract domain based on a restricted fragment of separation logic, and assigns a collection of Hoare triples to each procedure; the triples provide an overapprox ..."
Abstract

Cited by 100 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper describes a compositional shape analysis, where each procedure is analyzed independently of its callers. The analysis uses an abstract domain based on a restricted fragment of separation logic, and assigns a collection of Hoare triples to each procedure; the triples provide an overapproximation of data structure usage. Compositionality brings its usual benefits – increased potential to scale, ability to deal with unknown calling contexts, graceful way to deal with imprecision – to shape analysis, for the first time. The analysis rests on a generalized form of abduction (inference of explanatory hypotheses) which we call biabduction. Biabduction displays abduction as a kind of inverse to the frame problem: it jointly infers antiframes (missing portions of state) and frames (portions of state not touched by an operation), and is the basis of a new interprocedural analysis algorithm. We have implemented
A Survey on Complexity Results for Nonmonotonic Logics
 Journal of Logic Programming
, 1993
"... This paper surveys the main results appeared in the literature on the computational complexity of nonmonotonic inference tasks. We not only give results about the tractability/intractability of the individual problems but we also analyze sources of complexity and explain intuitively the nature of e ..."
Abstract

Cited by 85 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper surveys the main results appeared in the literature on the computational complexity of nonmonotonic inference tasks. We not only give results about the tractability/intractability of the individual problems but we also analyze sources of complexity and explain intuitively the nature of easy/hard cases. We focus mainly on nonmonotonic formalisms, like default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, closedworld reasoning and abduction, whose relations with logic programming are clear and well studied. Complexity as well as recursiontheoretic results are surveyed. Work partially supported by the ESPRIT Basic Research Action COMPULOG and the Progetto Finalizzato Informatica of the CNR (Italian Research Council). The first author is supported by a CNR scholarship 1 Introduction Nonmonotonic logics and negation as failure in logic programming have been defined with the goal of providing formal tools for the representation of default information. One of the ideas und...
Representing and reasoning about semantic conflicts in heterogeneous information systems
, 1997
"... ..."
Plan Reuse versus Plan Generation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1995
"... The ability of a planner to reuse parts of old plans is hypothesized to be a valuable tool for improving efficiency of planning by avoiding the repetition of the same planning effort. We test this hypothesis from an analytical and empirical point of view. A comparative worstcase complexity analysis ..."
Abstract

Cited by 77 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The ability of a planner to reuse parts of old plans is hypothesized to be a valuable tool for improving efficiency of planning by avoiding the repetition of the same planning effort. We test this hypothesis from an analytical and empirical point of view. A comparative worstcase complexity analysis of generation and reuse under different assumptions reveals that it is not possible to achieve a provable efficiency gain of reuse over generation. Further, assuming "conservative" plan modification, plan reuse can actually be strictly more difficult than plan generation. While these results do not imply that there won't be an efficiency gain in some situations, retrieval of a good plan may present a serious bottleneck for plan reuse systems, as we will show. Finally, we present the results of an empirical study of two different plan reuse systems, pointing out possible pitfalls one should be aware of when attempting to employ reuse methods. ? This work was supported by the German Ministry...