Results 1  10
of
45
Rewriting Logic as a Logical and Semantic Framework
, 1993
"... Rewriting logic [72] is proposed as a logical framework in which other logics can be represented, and as a semantic framework for the specification of languages and systems. Using concepts from the theory of general logics [70], representations of an object logic L in a framework logic F are und ..."
Abstract

Cited by 147 (52 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Rewriting logic [72] is proposed as a logical framework in which other logics can be represented, and as a semantic framework for the specification of languages and systems. Using concepts from the theory of general logics [70], representations of an object logic L in a framework logic F are understood as mappings L ! F that translate one logic into the other in a conservative way. The ease with which such maps can be defined for a number of quite different logics of interest, including equational logic, Horn logic with equality, linear logic, logics with quantifiers, and any sequent calculus presentation of a logic for a very general notion of "sequent," is discussed in detail. Using the fact that rewriting logic is reflective, it is often possible to reify inside rewriting logic itself a representation map L ! RWLogic for the finitely presentable theories of L. Such a reification takes the form of a map between the abstract data types representing the finitary theories of...
Functional interpretations of feasibly constructive arithmetic
 Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 1993
"... i ..."
The origins of structural operational semantics
 Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming
, 2004
"... We review the origins of structural operational semantics. The main publication ‘A Structural Approach to Operational Semantics, ’ also known as the ‘Aarhus Notes, ’ appeared in 1981 [G.D. Plotkin, A structural approach to operational semantics, DAIMI FN19, Computer Science Department, Aarhus Unive ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We review the origins of structural operational semantics. The main publication ‘A Structural Approach to Operational Semantics, ’ also known as the ‘Aarhus Notes, ’ appeared in 1981 [G.D. Plotkin, A structural approach to operational semantics, DAIMI FN19, Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, 1981]. The development of the ideas dates back to the early 1970s, involving many people and building on previous work on programming languages and logic. The former included abstract syntax, the SECD machine, and the abstract interpreting machines of the Vienna school; the latter included the λcalculus and formal systems. The initial development of structural operational semantics was for simple functional languages, more or less variations of the λcalculus; after that the ideas were gradually extended to include languages with parallel features, such as Milner’s CCS. This experience set the ground for a more systematic exposition, the subject of an invited course of lectures at Aarhus University; some of these appeared in print as the 1981 Notes. We discuss the content of these lectures and some related considerations such as ‘small state’ versus ‘grand state, ’ structural versus compositional semantics, the influence of the Scott–Strachey approach to denotational semantics, the treatment of recursion and jumps, and static semantics. We next discuss relations with other work and some immediate further development. We conclude with an account of an old, previously unpublished, idea: an alternative, perhaps more readable, graphical presentation of systems of rules for operational semantics.
The Power of Vacillation in Language Learning
, 1992
"... Some extensions are considered of Gold's influential model of language learning by machine from positive data. Studied are criteria of successful learning featuring convergence in the limit to vacillation between several alternative correct grammars. The main theorem of this paper is that there are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Some extensions are considered of Gold's influential model of language learning by machine from positive data. Studied are criteria of successful learning featuring convergence in the limit to vacillation between several alternative correct grammars. The main theorem of this paper is that there are classes of languages that can be learned if convergence in the limit to up to (n+1) exactly correct grammars is allowed but which cannot be learned if convergence in the limit is to no more than n grammars, where the no more than n grammars can each make finitely many mistakes. This contrasts sharply with results of Barzdin and Podnieks and, later, Case and Smith, for learnability from both positive and negative data. A subset principle from a 1980 paper of Angluin is extended to the vacillatory and other criteria of this paper. This principle, provides a necessary condition for circumventing overgeneralization in learning from positive data. It is applied to prove another theorem to the eff...
Incremental concept learning for bounded data mining
 Information and Computation
, 1999
"... Important re nements of concept learning in the limit from positive data considerably restricting the accessibility of input data are studied. Let c be any concept; every in nite sequence of elements exhausting c is called positive presentation of c. In all learning models considered the learning ma ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (29 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Important re nements of concept learning in the limit from positive data considerably restricting the accessibility of input data are studied. Let c be any concept; every in nite sequence of elements exhausting c is called positive presentation of c. In all learning models considered the learning machine computes a sequence of hypotheses about the target concept from a positive presentation of it. With iterative learning, the learning machine, in making a conjecture, has access to its previous conjecture and the latest data item coming in. In kbounded examplememory inference (k is a priori xed) the learner is allowed to access, in making a conjecture, its previous hypothesis, its memory of up to k data items it has already seen, and the next element coming in. In the case of kfeedback identi cation, the learning machine, in making a conjecture, has access to its previous conjecture, the latest data item coming in, and, on the basis of this information, it can compute k items and query the database of previous data to nd out, for each of the k items, whether or not it is in the database (k is again a priori xed). In all cases, the sequence of conjectures has to converge to a hypothesis
Witnessing Functions in Bounded Arithmetic and Search Problems
, 1994
"... We investigate the possibility to characterize (multi)functions that are \Sigma b i definable with small i (i = 1; 2; 3) in fragments of bounded arithmetic T2 in terms of natural search problems defined over polynomialtime structures. We obtain the following results: 1. A reformulation of known ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate the possibility to characterize (multi)functions that are \Sigma b i definable with small i (i = 1; 2; 3) in fragments of bounded arithmetic T2 in terms of natural search problems defined over polynomialtime structures. We obtain the following results: 1. A reformulation of known characterizations of (multi)functions that are \Sigma b 1  and \Sigma b 2 definable in the theories S 1 2 and T 1 2 . 2. New characterizations of (multi)functions that are \Sigma b 2  and \Sigma b 3  definable in the theory T 2 2 . 3. A new nonconservation result: the theory T 2 2 (ff) is not 8\Sigma b 1 (ff) conservative over the theory S 2 2 (ff). To prove that the theory T 2 2 (ff) is not 8\Sigma b 1 (ff)conservative over the theory S 2 2 (ff), we present two examples of a \Sigma b 1 (ff)principle separating the two theories: (a) the weak pigeonhole principle WPHP (a 2 ; f; g) formalizing that no function f is a bijection between a 2 and a with the inverse...
Theories for Complexity Classes and their Propositional Translations
 Complexity of computations and proofs
, 2004
"... We present in a uniform manner simple twosorted theories corresponding to each of eight complexity classes between AC and P. We present simple translations between these theories and systems of the quanti ed propositional calculus. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present in a uniform manner simple twosorted theories corresponding to each of eight complexity classes between AC and P. We present simple translations between these theories and systems of the quanti ed propositional calculus.
An Improved Lower Bound for the Elementary Theories of Trees
, 1996
"... . The firstorder theories of finite and rational, constructor and feature trees possess complete axiomatizations and are decidable by quantifier elimination [15, 13, 14, 5, 10, 3, 20, 4, 2]. By using the uniform inseparability lower bounds techniques due to Compton and Henson [6], based on repr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. The firstorder theories of finite and rational, constructor and feature trees possess complete axiomatizations and are decidable by quantifier elimination [15, 13, 14, 5, 10, 3, 20, 4, 2]. By using the uniform inseparability lower bounds techniques due to Compton and Henson [6], based on representing large binary relations by means of short formulas manipulating with high trees, we prove that all the above theories, as well as all their subtheories, are nonelementary in the sense of Kalmar, i.e., cannot be decided within time bounded by a k story exponential function 1 exp k (n) for any fixed k. Moreover, for some constant d ? 0 these decision problems require nondeterministic time exceeding exp 1 (bdnc) infinitely often. 1 Introduction Trees are fundamental in Computer Science. Different tree structures are used as underlying domains in automated theorem proving, term rewriting, functional and logic programming, constraint solving, symbolic computation, knowledge re...
Finding Minimal Generalizations for Unions of Pattern Languages and Its Application to Inductive Inference from Positive Data.
 In Proc. the 11th STACS, LNCS 775
, 1994
"... A pattern is a string of constant symbols and variables. The language defined by a pattern p is the set of constant strings obtained from p by substituting nonempty constant strings for variables in p. In this paper we are concerning with polynomial time inference from positive data of the class of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A pattern is a string of constant symbols and variables. The language defined by a pattern p is the set of constant strings obtained from p by substituting nonempty constant strings for variables in p. In this paper we are concerning with polynomial time inference from positive data of the class of unions of a bounded number of pattern languages. We introduce a syntactic notion of minimal multiple generalizations (mmg for short) to study the inferability of classes of unions. If a pattern p is obtained from another pattern q by substituting nonempty patterns for variables in q, q is said to be more general than p. A set of patterns defines a union of their languages. A set Q of patterns is said to be more general than a set P of patterns if for any pattern p in P there exists a more general pattern q in Q than p. Clearly more general set of patterns defines larger unions. A kminimal multiple generalization (kmmg) of a set S of strings is a minimally general set of at most k pattern...