Results 1  10
of
125
Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
, 2002
"... [Read before The Royal Statistical Society at a meeting organized by the Research ..."
Abstract

Cited by 435 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
[Read before The Royal Statistical Society at a meeting organized by the Research
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
, 2007
"... Scoring rules assess the quality of probabilistic forecasts, by assigning a numerical score based on the predictive distribution and on the event or value that materializes. A scoring rule is proper if the forecaster maximizes the expected score for an observation drawn from the distribution F if he ..."
Abstract

Cited by 357 (27 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Scoring rules assess the quality of probabilistic forecasts, by assigning a numerical score based on the predictive distribution and on the event or value that materializes. A scoring rule is proper if the forecaster maximizes the expected score for an observation drawn from the distribution F if he or she issues the probabilistic forecast F, rather than G ΜΈ = F. It is strictly proper if the maximum is unique. In prediction problems, proper scoring rules encourage the forecaster to make careful assessments and to be honest. In estimation problems, strictly proper scoring rules provide attractive loss and utility functions that can be tailored to the problem at hand. This article reviews and develops the theory of proper scoring rules on general probability spaces, and proposes and discusses examples thereof. Proper scoring rules derive from convex functions and relate to information measures, entropy functions, and Bregman divergences. In the case of categorical variables, we prove a rigorous version of the Savage representation. Examples of scoring rules for probabilistic forecasts in the form of predictive densities include the logarithmic, spherical, pseudospherical, and quadratic scores. The continuous ranked probability score applies to probabilistic forecasts that take the form of predictive cumulative distribution functions. It generalizes the absolute error and forms a special case of a new and very general type of score, the energy score. Like many other scoring rules, the energy score admits a kernel representation in terms of negative definite functions, with links to inequalities of Hoeffding type, in both univariate and multivariate settings. Proper scoring rules for quantile and interval forecasts are also discussed. We relate proper scoring rules to Bayes factors and to crossvalidation, and propose a novel form of crossvalidation known as randomfold crossvalidation. A case study on probabilistic weather forecasts in the North American Pacific Northwest illustrates the importance of propriety. We note optimum score approaches to point and quantile
Bayesian Deviance, the Effective Number of Parameters, and the Comparison of Arbitrarily Complex Models
, 1998
"... We consider the problem of comparing complex hierarchical models in which the number of parameters is not clearly defined. We follow Dempster in examining the posterior distribution of the loglikelihood under each model, from which we derive measures of fit and complexity (the effective number of p ..."
Abstract

Cited by 51 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of comparing complex hierarchical models in which the number of parameters is not clearly defined. We follow Dempster in examining the posterior distribution of the loglikelihood under each model, from which we derive measures of fit and complexity (the effective number of parameters). These may be combined into a Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), which is shown to have an approximate decisiontheoretic justification. Analytic and asymptotic identities reveal the measure of complexity to be a generalisation of a wide range of previous suggestions, with particular reference to the neural network literature. The contributions of individual observations to fit and complexity can give rise to a diagnostic plot of deviance residuals against leverages. The procedure is illustrated in a number of examples, and throughout it is emphasised that the required quantities are trivial to compute in a Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis, and require no analytic work for new...
Semiparametric Bayesian Analysis Of Survival Data
 Journal of the American Statistical Association
, 1996
"... this paper are motivated and aimed at analyzing some common types of survival data from different medical studies. We will center our attention to the following topics. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper are motivated and aimed at analyzing some common types of survival data from different medical studies. We will center our attention to the following topics.
MCMC Methods for Computing Bayes Factors: A Comparative Review
 Journal of the American Statistical Association
, 2000
"... this paper we review several of these methods, and subsequently compare them in the context of two examples, the first a simple regression example, and the second a much more challenging hierarchical longitudinal model of the kind often encountered in biostatistical practice. We find that the joint ..."
Abstract

Cited by 38 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we review several of these methods, and subsequently compare them in the context of two examples, the first a simple regression example, and the second a much more challenging hierarchical longitudinal model of the kind often encountered in biostatistical practice. We find that the joint modelparameter space search methods perform adequately but can be difficult to program and tune, while the marginal likelihood methods are often less troublesome and require less in the way of additional coding. Our results suggest that the latter methods may be most appropriate for practitioners working in many standard model choice settings, while the former remain important for comparing large numbers of models, or models whose parameters cannot be easily updated in relatively few blocks. We caution however that all of the methods we compare require significant human and computer effort, suggesting that less formal Bayesian model choice methods may offer a more realistic alternative in many cases.
Bayesian Variogram Modeling for an Isotropic Spatial Process
 Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics
, 1997
"... The variogram is a basic tool in geostatistics. In the case of an assumed isotropic process, it is used to compare variability of the difference between pairs of observations as a function of their distance. Customary approaches to variogram modeling create an empirical variogram and then fit a vali ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The variogram is a basic tool in geostatistics. In the case of an assumed isotropic process, it is used to compare variability of the difference between pairs of observations as a function of their distance. Customary approaches to variogram modeling create an empirical variogram and then fit a valid parametric or nonparametric variogram model to it. Here we adopt a Bayesian approach to variogram modeling. In particular, we seek to analyze a recent data set of scallop catches. We have the results of the analysis of an earlier data set from the region to supply useful prior information. In addition, the Bayesian approach enables inference about any aspect of spatial dependence of interest rather than merely providing a fitted variogram. We utilize discrete mixtures of Bessel functions which allow a rich and flexible class of variogram models. To differentiate between models, we introduce a utility based model choice criterion that encourages parsimony. We conclude with a fully Bayesian ...
Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison
"... The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used for Bayesian model comparison, despite the lack of a clear theoretical foundation. DIC is shown to be an approximation to a penalized loss function based on the deviance, with a penalty derived from a crossvalidation argument. This approximati ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used for Bayesian model comparison, despite the lack of a clear theoretical foundation. DIC is shown to be an approximation to a penalized loss function based on the deviance, with a penalty derived from a crossvalidation argument. This approximation is valid only when the effective number of parameters in the model is much smaller than the number of independent observations. In disease mapping, a typical application of DIC, this assumption does not hold and DIC underpenalizes more complex models. Another deviancebased loss function, derived from the same decisiontheoretic framework, is applied to mixture models, which have previously been considered an unsuitable application for DIC.
Predictive model assessment for count data
, 2007
"... Summary. We discuss tools for the evaluation of probabilistic forecasts and the critique of statistical models for ordered discrete data. Our proposals include a nonrandomized version of the probability integral transform, marginal calibration diagrams and proper scoring rules, such as the predicti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Summary. We discuss tools for the evaluation of probabilistic forecasts and the critique of statistical models for ordered discrete data. Our proposals include a nonrandomized version of the probability integral transform, marginal calibration diagrams and proper scoring rules, such as the predictive deviance. In case studies, we critique count regression models for patent data, and assess the predictive performance of Bayesian ageperiodcohort models for larynx cancer counts in Germany.