A group signature scheme allows a group member to sign messages anonymously on behalf of the group. However, in the case of a dispute, the identity of a signature’s originator can be revealed (only) by a designated entity. The interactive counterparts of group signatures are identity escrow schemes or group identification scheme with revocable anonymity. This work introduces a new provably secure group signature and a companion identity escrow scheme that are significantly more efficient than the state of the art. In its interactive, identity escrow form, our scheme is proven secure and coalition-resistant under the strong RSA and the decisional Diffie-Hellman assumptions. The security of the noninteractive variant, i.e., the group signature scheme, relies additionally on the Fiat-Shamir heuristic (also known as the random oracle model).

This paper presents the first efficient statistical zero-knowledge protocols to prove statements such as: A committed number is a pseudo-prime.

A cryptographic protocol possesses separability if the participants can choose their keys independently of each other. This is advantageous from a key-management as well as from a security point of view. This paper focuses on separability in group signature schemes. Such schemes allow a group member to sign messages anonymously on the group's behalf. However, in case of this anonymity's misuse, a trustee can reveal the originator of a signature. We provide a generic fully separable group signature scheme and present an ecient instantiation thereof. The scheme is suited for large groups; the size of the group's public key and the length of signatures do not depe...

In the Outsourced Database (ODB) model, organizations outsource their data management needs to an external service provider. The service provider hosts clients' databases and offers seamless mechanisms to create, store, update and access (query) their databases. This model introduces several research issues related to data security. One of the core security requirements is providing efficient mechanisms to ensure data integrity and authenticity while incurring minimal computation and bandwidth overhead. In this work, we investigate the problem of ensuring data integrity and suggest secure and practical schemes that help facilitate authentication of query replies. We explore the applicability of popular digital signature schemes (RSA and DSA) as well as a recently proposed scheme due to Boneh et al. [1] and present their performance measurements.

Abstract. This paper presents efficient off-line anonymous e-cash schemes where a user can withdraw a wallet containing 2 ℓ coins each of which she can spend unlinkably. Our first result is a scheme, secure under the strong RSA and the y-DDHI assumptions, where the complexity of the withdrawal and spend operations is O(ℓ + k) andtheuser’s wallet can be stored using O(ℓ + k) bits,wherek is a security parameter. The best previously known schemes require at least one of these complexities to be O(2 ℓ · k). In fact, compared to previous e-cash schemes, our whole wallet of 2 ℓ coins has about the same size as one coin in these schemes. Our scheme also offers exculpability of users, that is, the bank can prove to third parties that a user has double-spent. We then extend our scheme to our second result, the first e-cash scheme that provides traceable coins without a trusted third party. That is, once a user has double spent one of the 2 ℓ coins in her wallet, all her spendings of these coins can be traced. However, the price for this is that the complexity of the spending and of the withdrawal protocols becomes O(ℓ · k) and O(ℓ · k + k 2) bits, respectively, and wallets take O(ℓ · k) bitsofstorage. All our schemes are secure in the random oracle model.

Abstract. A group signature scheme allows any group member to sign on behalf of the group in an anonymous and unlinkable fashion. In the event of a dispute, a designated trusted entity can reveal the identity of the signer. Group signatures are claimed to have many useful applications such as voting and electronic cash. A number of group signature schemes have been proposed to-date. However, in order for the whole group signature concept to become practical and credible, the problem of secure and efficient group member revocation must be addressed. In this paper, we construct a new revocation method for group signatures based on the signature scheme by Ateniese et al. [ACJT]. This new method represents an advance in the state-of-the-art since the only revocation schemes proposed thus far are either: 1) based on implicit revocation and the use of fixed time periods, or 2) require the signature size to be linear in the number of revoked members. Our method, in contrast, does not rely on time periods, offers constant-length signatures and constant work for the signer.

Abstract. We put forward two new measures of security for threshold schemes secure in the adaptive adversary model: security under concurrent composition; and security without the assumption of reliable erasure. Using novel constructions and analytical tools, in both these settings, we exhibit efficient secure threshold protocols for a variety of cryptographic applications. In particular, based on the recent scheme by Cramer-Shoup, we construct adaptively secure threshold cryptosystems secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack under the DDH intractability assumption. Our techniques are also applicable to other cryptosystems and signature schemes, like RSA, DSS, and ElGamal. Our techniques include the first efficient implementation, for a wide but special class of protocols, of secure channels in erasure-free adaptive model. Of independent interest, we present the notion of a committed proof. 1

Signature schemes are fundamental cryptographic primitives, useful as a stand-alone application, and as a building block in the design of secure protocols and other cryptographic objects. In this thesis, we study both the uses that signature schemes find in protocols, and the design of signature schemes suitable for a broad range of applications. An important

Abstract. Constructing practical and provably secure group signature schemes has been a very active research topic in recent years. A group signature can be viewed as a digital signature with certain extra properties. Notably, anyone can verify that a signature is generated by a legitimate group member, while the actual signer can only be identified (and linked) by a designated entity called a group manager. Currently, the most efficient group signature scheme available is due to Camenisch and Lysyanskaya [CL02]. It is obtained by integrating a novel dynamic accumulator with the scheme by Ateniese, et al. [ACJT00]. In this paper, we construct a dynamic accumulator that accumulates composites, as opposed to previous accumulators that accumulated primes. We also present an efficient method for proving knowledge of factorization of a committed value. Based on these (and other) techniques we design a novel provably secure group signature scheme. It operates in the common auxiliary string model and offers two important benefits: 1) the Join process is very efficient: a new member computes only a single exponentiation, and 2) the (unoptimized) cost of generating a group signature is 17 exponentiations which is appreciably less than the stateof-the-art. 1

Abstract. It is usually the case that before a transaction can take place, some mutual trust must be established between the participants. On-line, doing so requires the exchange of some certified information about the participants. The easy solution is to disclose one’s identity and reveal all of one’s certificates to establish such a trust relationship. However, it is clear that such an approach is unsatisfactory from a privacy point of view. In fact, often revealing any information that uniquely corresponds to a given individual is a bad idea from the privacy point of view. In this survey paper we describe a framework where for each transaction there is a precise specification of what pieces of certified data is revealed to each participant. We show how to specify transactions in this framework, give examples of transactions that use it, and describe the cryptographic building blocks that this framework is built upon. We conclude with bibliographic notes on the state-of-the-art in this area. 1