Results 1  10
of
51
Concurrent ZeroKnowledge
 IN 30TH STOC
, 1999
"... Concurrent executions of a zeroknowledge protocol by a single prover (with one or more verifiers) may leak information and may not be zeroknowledge in toto. In this paper, we study the problem of maintaining zeroknowledge We introduce the notion of an (; ) timing constraint: for any two proces ..."
Abstract

Cited by 154 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Concurrent executions of a zeroknowledge protocol by a single prover (with one or more verifiers) may leak information and may not be zeroknowledge in toto. In this paper, we study the problem of maintaining zeroknowledge We introduce the notion of an (; ) timing constraint: for any two processors P1 and P2 , if P1 measures elapsed time on its local clock and P2 measures elapsed time on its local clock, and P2 starts after P1 does, then P2 will finish after P1 does. We show that if the adversary is constrained by an (; ) assumption then there exist fourround almost concurrent zeroknowledge interactive proofs and perfect concurrent zeroknowledge arguments for every language in NP . We also address the more specific problem of Deniable Authentication, for which we propose several particularly efficient solutions. Deniable Authentication is of independent interest, even in the sequential case; our concurrent solutions yield sequential solutions without recourse to timing, i.e., in the standard model.
Certificate Revocation and Certificate Update
 USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM
, 1998
"... A new solution is suggested for the problem of certificate revocation. This solution represents Certificate Revocation Lists by an authenticated search data structure. The process of verifying whether a certificate is in the list or not, as well as updating the list, is made very efficient. The sugg ..."
Abstract

Cited by 144 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A new solution is suggested for the problem of certificate revocation. This solution represents Certificate Revocation Lists by an authenticated search data structure. The process of verifying whether a certificate is in the list or not, as well as updating the list, is made very efficient. The suggested solution gains in scalability, communication costs, robustness to parameter changes and update rate. Comparisons to the following solutions are included: 'traditional' CRLs (Certificate Revocation Lists), Micali's Certificate Revocation System (CRS) and Kocher's Certificate Revocation Trees (CRT).
Finally, a scenario in which certificates are not revoked, but frequently issued for shortterm periods is considered. Based on the authenticated search data structure scheme, a certificate update scheme is presented in which all certificates are updated by a common message.
The suggested solutions for certificate revocation and certificate update problems is better than current solutions with respect to communication costs, update rate, and robustness to changes in parameters and is compatible e.g. with X.500 certificates.
An Efficient Offline Electronic Cash System Based On The Representation Problem
, 1993
"... We present a new offline electronic cash system based on a problem, called the representation problem, of which little use has been made in literature thus far. Our system is the first to be based entirely on discrete logarithms. Using the representation problem as a basic concept, some technique ..."
Abstract

Cited by 136 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a new offline electronic cash system based on a problem, called the representation problem, of which little use has been made in literature thus far. Our system is the first to be based entirely on discrete logarithms. Using the representation problem as a basic concept, some techniques are introduced that enable us to construct protocols for withdrawal and payment that do not use the cut and choose methodology of earlier systems. As a consequence, our cash system is much more efficient in both computation and communication complexity than previously proposed systems. Another
Designated Verifier Proofs and Their Applications
, 1996
"... For many proofs of knowledge it is important that only the verifier designated by the confirmer can obtain any conviction of the correctness of the proof. A good example of such a situation is for undeniable signatures, where the confirmer of a signature wants to make sure that only the intended ver ..."
Abstract

Cited by 134 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
For many proofs of knowledge it is important that only the verifier designated by the confirmer can obtain any conviction of the correctness of the proof. A good example of such a situation is for undeniable signatures, where the confirmer of a signature wants to make sure that only the intended verifier(s) in fact can be convinced about the validity or invalidity of the signature. Generally, authentication of messages and offtherecord messages are in conflict with each other. We show how, using designation of verifiers, these notions can be combined, allowing authenticated but private conversations to take place. Our solution guarantees that only the specified verifier can be convinced by the proof, even if he shares all his secret information with entities that want to get convinced. Our solution is based on trapdoor commitments [4], allowing the designated verifier to open up commitments in any way he wants. We demonstrate how a trapdoor commitment scheme can be used to constr...
Onthefly verification of rateless erasure codes for efficient content distribution
 In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
, 2004
"... Abstract — The quality of peertopeer content distribution can suffer when malicious participants intentionally corrupt content. Some systems using simple blockbyblock downloading can verify blocks with traditional cryptographic signatures and hashes, but these techniques do not apply well to mor ..."
Abstract

Cited by 89 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract — The quality of peertopeer content distribution can suffer when malicious participants intentionally corrupt content. Some systems using simple blockbyblock downloading can verify blocks with traditional cryptographic signatures and hashes, but these techniques do not apply well to more elegant systems that use rateless erasure codes for efficient multicast transfers. This paper presents a practical scheme, based on homomorphic hashing, that enables a downloader to perform onthefly verification of erasureencoded blocks. I.
A new paradigm for collisionfree hashing: incrementality at reduced cost
 In Eurocrypt97
, 1997
"... We present a simple, new paradigm for the design of collisionfree hash functions. Any function emanating from this paradigm is incremental. (This means that if a message x which Ihave previously hashed is modi ed to x 0 then rather than having to recompute the hash of x 0 from scratch, I can quick ..."
Abstract

Cited by 79 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a simple, new paradigm for the design of collisionfree hash functions. Any function emanating from this paradigm is incremental. (This means that if a message x which Ihave previously hashed is modi ed to x 0 then rather than having to recompute the hash of x 0 from scratch, I can quickly \update " the old hash value to the new one, in time proportional to the amount of modi cation made in x to get x 0.) Also any function emanating from this paradigm is parallelizable, useful for hardware implementation. We derive several speci c functions from our paradigm. All use a standard hash function, assumed ideal, and some algebraic operations. The rst function, MuHASH, uses one modular multiplication per block of the message, making it reasonably e cient, and signi cantly faster than previous incremental hash functions. Its security is proven, based on the hardness of the discrete logarithm problem. A second function, AdHASH, is even faster, using additions instead of multiplications, with security proven given either that approximation of the length of shortest lattice vectors is hard or that the weighted subset sum problem is hard. A third function, LtHASH, is a practical variant of recent lattice based functions, with security proven
RSABased Undeniable Signatures
"... We present the first undeniable signatures scheme based on RSA. Since their introduction in 1989 a significant amount of work has been devoted to the investigation of undeniable signatures. So far, this work has been based on discrete log systems. In contrast, our scheme uses regular RSA signature ..."
Abstract

Cited by 76 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present the first undeniable signatures scheme based on RSA. Since their introduction in 1989 a significant amount of work has been devoted to the investigation of undeniable signatures. So far, this work has been based on discrete log systems. In contrast, our scheme uses regular RSA signatures to generate undeniable signatures. In this new setting, both the signature and verification exponents of RSA are kept secret by the signer, while the public key consists of a composite modulus and a sample RSA signature on a single public message. Our scheme possesses several attractive properties. First of all, provable security, as forging the undeniable signatures is as hard as forging regular RSA signatures. Second, both the confirmation and denial protocols are zeroknowledge. In addition, these protocols are efficient (particularly, the confirmation protocol involves only two rounds of communication and a small number of exponentiations). Furthermore the RSAbased structure of our scheme provides with simple and elegant solutions to add several of the more advanced properties of undeniable signatures found in the literature, including convertibility of the undeniable signatures (into publicly verifiable ones), the possibility to delegate the ability to confirm and deny signatures to a third party without giving up the power to sign, and the existence of distributed (threshold) versions of the signing and confirmation operations. Due to the above properties and the fact that our undeniable signatures are identical in form to standard RSA signatures, the scheme we present becomes a very attractive candidate for practical implementations.
Practical and ProvablySecure Commitment Schemes from CollisionFree Hashing
 in Advances in Cryptology  CRYPTO96, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1109
, 1996
"... . We present a very practical stringcommitment scheme which is provably secure based solely on collisionfree hashing. Our scheme enables a computationally bounded party to commit strings to an unbounded one, and is optimal (within a small constant factor) in terms of interaction, communication, a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We present a very practical stringcommitment scheme which is provably secure based solely on collisionfree hashing. Our scheme enables a computationally bounded party to commit strings to an unbounded one, and is optimal (within a small constant factor) in terms of interaction, communication, and computation. Our result also proves that constant round statistical zeroknowledge arguments and constantround computational zeroknowledge proofs for NP exist based on the existence of collisionfree hash functions. 1 Introduction String commitment is a fundamental primitive for cryptographic protocols. A commitment scheme is an electronic way to temporarily hide a value that cannot be changed. Such a scheme emulates by means of a protocol the following twostage process. In Stage 1 (the Commit stage), a party called the Sender locks a message in a box, and sends the locked box to another party called the receiver. In Stage 2 (the Decommit stage), the Sender provides the Receiver with ...
Transitive Signature Schemes
 IN PROCEEDINGS OF RSA 2002, VOLUME 2271 OF LNCS
, 2002
"... We consider the problem of finding publickey digital signature schemes with a transitiveclosure property for signing the vertices and edges of a (directed or undirected) finite graph. More precisely, we want the property that if Alice has signed edge (u, v) and she has also signed the edge (v, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of finding publickey digital signature schemes with a transitiveclosure property for signing the vertices and edges of a (directed or undirected) finite graph. More precisely, we want the property that if Alice has signed edge (u, v) and she has also signed the edge (v, w) then Bob (or anyone) can derive from those two signatures Alice's signature on the edge (u, w). We present an efficient solution for undirected graphs, and leave the case for directed graphs as an open problem.
An Efficient Existentially Unforgeable Signature Scheme and its Applications
 Journal of Cryptology
, 1994
"... A signature scheme is existentially unforgeable if, given any polynomial (in the security parameter) number of pairs (m 1 ; S(m 1 )); (m 2 ; S(m 2 )); : : : (m k ; S(m k )) where S(m) denotes the signature on the message m, it is computationally infeasible to generate a pair (m k+1 ; S(m k+1 )) fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 45 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A signature scheme is existentially unforgeable if, given any polynomial (in the security parameter) number of pairs (m 1 ; S(m 1 )); (m 2 ; S(m 2 )); : : : (m k ; S(m k )) where S(m) denotes the signature on the message m, it is computationally infeasible to generate a pair (m k+1 ; S(m k+1 )) for any message m k+1 = 2 fm 1 ; : : : m k g. We present an existentially unforgeable signature scheme that for a reasonable setting of parameters requires at most 6 times the amount of time needed to generate a signature using "plain" RSA (which is not existentially unforgeable). We point out applications where our scheme is desirable. Preliminary version appeared in Crypto'94 y IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120. Research supported by a BSF Grant 32000321. Email: dwork@almaden.ibm.com. z Incumbent of the Morris and Rose Goldman Career Development Chair, Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Re...