Results 1  10
of
304
Monotone Complexity
, 1990
"... We give a general complexity classification scheme for monotone computation, including monotone spacebounded and Turing machine models not previously considered. We propose monotone complexity classes including mAC i , mNC i , mLOGCFL, mBWBP , mL, mNL, mP , mBPP and mNP . We define a simple ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2429 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We give a general complexity classification scheme for monotone computation, including monotone spacebounded and Turing machine models not previously considered. We propose monotone complexity classes including mAC i , mNC i , mLOGCFL, mBWBP , mL, mNL, mP , mBPP and mNP . We define a simple notion of monotone reducibility and exhibit complete problems. This provides a framework for stating existing results and asking new questions. We show that mNL (monotone nondeterministic logspace) is not closed under complementation, in contrast to Immerman's and Szelepcs 'enyi's nonmonotone result [Imm88, Sze87] that NL = coNL; this is a simple extension of the monotone circuit depth lower bound of Karchmer and Wigderson [KW90] for stconnectivity. We also consider mBWBP (monotone bounded width branching programs) and study the question of whether mBWBP is properly contained in mNC 1 , motivated by Barrington's result [Bar89] that BWBP = NC 1 . Although we cannot answer t...
The probabilistic method
, 2000
"... The Probabilistic Method has recently been developed intensively and became one of the most powerful and widely used tools applied in Combinatorics. One of the major reasons for this rapid development is the important role of randomness in Theoretical Computer Science, a field which is recently the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1717 (112 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The Probabilistic Method has recently been developed intensively and became one of the most powerful and widely used tools applied in Combinatorics. One of the major reasons for this rapid development is the important role of randomness in Theoretical Computer Science, a field which is recently the source of many intriguing combinatorial problems. The interplay between Discrete Mathematics and Computer Science suggests an algorithmic point of view in the study of the Probabilistic Method in Combinatorics and this is the approach we tried to adopt in this book. The manuscript thus includes a discussion of algorithmic techniques together with a study of the classical method as well as the modern tools applied in it. The first part of the book contains a description of the tools applied in probabilistic arguments, including the basic techniques that use expectation and variance, as well as the more recent applications of Martingales and Correlation Inequalities. The second part includes a study of various topics in which probabilistic techniques have been successful. This part contains chapters on discrepancy and random graphs, as well as on several areas in Theoretical Computer
Boundedwidth polynomialsize branching programs recognize exactly those languages
 in NC’, in “Proceedings, 18th ACM STOC
, 1986
"... We show that any language recognized by an NC ’ circuit (fanin 2, depth O(log n)) can be recognized by a width5 polynomialsize branching program. As any boundedwidth polynomialsize branching program can be simulated by an NC ’ circuit, we have that the class of languages recognized by such prog ..."
Abstract

Cited by 215 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We show that any language recognized by an NC ’ circuit (fanin 2, depth O(log n)) can be recognized by a width5 polynomialsize branching program. As any boundedwidth polynomialsize branching program can be simulated by an NC ’ circuit, we have that the class of languages recognized by such programs is exactly nonuniform NC’. Further, following
The NPcompleteness column: an ongoing guide
 Journal of Algorithms
, 1985
"... This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NPcompleteness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & ..."
Abstract

Cited by 196 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This is the nineteenth edition of a (usually) quarterly column that covers new developments in the theory of NPcompleteness. The presentation is modeled on that used by M. R. Garey and myself in our book ‘‘Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness,’ ’ W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘[G&J]’’; previous columns will be referred to by their dates). A background equivalent to that provided by [G&J] is assumed, and, when appropriate, crossreferences will be given to that book and the list of problems (NPcomplete and harder) presented there. Readers who have results they would like mentioned (NPhardness, PSPACEhardness, polynomialtimesolvability, etc.) or open problems they would like publicized, should
Which Problems Have Strongly Exponential Complexity?
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1998
"... For several NPcomplete problems, there have been a progression of better but still exponential algorithms. In this paper, we address the relative likelihood of subexponential algorithms for these problems. We introduce a generalized reduction which we call SubExponential Reduction Family (SERF) t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 132 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
For several NPcomplete problems, there have been a progression of better but still exponential algorithms. In this paper, we address the relative likelihood of subexponential algorithms for these problems. We introduce a generalized reduction which we call SubExponential Reduction Family (SERF) that preserves subexponential complexity. We show that CircuitSAT is SERFcomplete for all NPsearch problems, and that for any fixed k, kSAT, kColorability, kSet Cover, Independent Set, Clique, Vertex Cover, are SERFcomplete for the class SNP of search problems expressible by second order existential formulas whose first order part is universal. In particular, subexponential complexity for any one of the above problems implies the same for all others. We also look at the issue of proving strongly exponential lower bounds for AC 0 ; that is, bounds of the form 2 \Omega\Gamma n) . This problem is even open for depth3 circuits. In fact, such a bound for depth3 circuits with even l...
On Uniformity within NC¹
 JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES
, 1990
"... In order to study circuit complexity classes within NC¹ in a uniform setting, we need a uniformity condition which is more restrictive than those in common use. Two such conditions, stricter than NC¹ uniformity [Ru81,Co85], have appeared in recent research: Immerman's families of circuits defin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 127 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In order to study circuit complexity classes within NC¹ in a uniform setting, we need a uniformity condition which is more restrictive than those in common use. Two such conditions, stricter than NC¹ uniformity [Ru81,Co85], have appeared in recent research: Immerman's families of circuits defined by firstorder formulas [Im87a,Im87b] and a uniformity corresponding to Buss' deterministic logtime reductions [Bu87]. We show that these two notions are equivalent, leading to a natural notion of uniformity for lowlevel circuit complexity classes. We show that recent results on the structure of NC¹ [Ba89] still hold true in this very uniform setting. Finally, we investigate a parallel notion of uniformity, still more restrictive, based on the regular languages. Here we give characterizations of subclasses of the regular languages based on their logical expressibility, extending recent work of Straubing, Th'erien, and Thomas [STT88]. A preliminary version of this work appeared as [BIS88].
On span programs
 Proc. 8th Ann. Symp. Structure in Complexity Theory
, 1993
"... ..."
(Show Context)
The Complexity Of Propositional Proofs
 Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
, 1995
"... This paper of Tseitin is a landmark as the first to give nontrivial lower bounds for propositional proofs; although it predates the first papers on ..."
Abstract

Cited by 107 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper of Tseitin is a landmark as the first to give nontrivial lower bounds for propositional proofs; although it predates the first papers on
On the power of smalldepth threshold circuits
 Proceedings 31st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
, 1990
"... Abstract. Weinvestigate the power of threshold circuits of small depth. In particular, we give functions that require exponential size unweighted threshold circuits of depth 3 when we restrict the bottom fanin. We also prove that there are monotone functions fk that can be computed in depth k and li ..."
Abstract

Cited by 104 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. Weinvestigate the power of threshold circuits of small depth. In particular, we give functions that require exponential size unweighted threshold circuits of depth 3 when we restrict the bottom fanin. We also prove that there are monotone functions fk that can be computed in depth k and linear size ^ � _circuits but require exponential size to compute by a depth k; 1 monotone weighted threshold circuit. Key words. Circuit complexity, monotone circuits, threshold circuits, lower bounds Subject classi cations. 68Q15, 68Q99 1.
The Expressive Power of Voting Polynomials
 Combinatorica
, 1993
"... We consider the problem of approximating a Boolean function f : f0; 1g n ! f0; 1g by the sign of an integer polynomial p of degree k. For us, a polynomial p(x) predicts the value of f(x) if, whenever p(x) 0, f(x) = 1, and whenever p(x) ! 0, f(x) = 0. A lowdegree polynomial p is a good approxima ..."
Abstract

Cited by 91 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of approximating a Boolean function f : f0; 1g n ! f0; 1g by the sign of an integer polynomial p of degree k. For us, a polynomial p(x) predicts the value of f(x) if, whenever p(x) 0, f(x) = 1, and whenever p(x) ! 0, f(x) = 0. A lowdegree polynomial p is a good approximator for f if it predicts f at almost all points. Given a positive integer k, and a Boolean function f , we ask, "how good is the best degree k approximation to f?" We introduce a new lower bound technique which applies to any Boolean function. We show that the lower bound technique yields tight bounds in the case f is parity. Minsky and Papert [10] proved that a perceptron can not compute parity; our bounds indicate exactly how well Yale University, Dept. of Computer Science, P.O. Box 208285, New Haven CT 065208285. y Email: aspnesjames@cs.yale.edu. z Email: beigelrichard@cs.yale.edu. Supported in part by NSF grants CCR8808949 and CCR8958528. x CarnegieMellon University, Schoo...