Results 1  10
of
218
Cognitive networks
 in Proc. of IEEE DySPAN 2005
, 2005
"... Abstract — This paper presents a definition and framework for a novel type of adaptive data network: the cognitive network. In a cognitive network, the collection of elements that make up the network observes network conditions and then, using prior knowledge gained from previous interactions with t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1097 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — This paper presents a definition and framework for a novel type of adaptive data network: the cognitive network. In a cognitive network, the collection of elements that make up the network observes network conditions and then, using prior knowledge gained from previous interactions with the network, plans, decides and acts on this information. Cognitive networks are different from other “intelligent ” communication technologies because these actions are taken with respect to the endtoend goals of a data flow. In addition to the cognitive aspects of the network, a specification language is needed to translate the user’s endtoend goals into a form understandable by the cognitive process. The cognitive network also depends on a Software Adaptable Network that has both an external interface accessible to the cognitive network and network status sensors. These devices are used to provide control and feedback. The paper concludes by presenting a simple case study to illustrate a cognitive network and its framework. I.
Design Galleries: A General Approach to Setting Parameters for Computer Graphics and Animation
, 1997
"... Image rendering maps scene parameters to output pixel values; animation maps motioncontrol parameters to trajectory values. Because these mapping functions are usually multidimensional, nonlinear, and discontinuous, #nding input parameters that yield desirable output values is often a painful pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 247 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Image rendering maps scene parameters to output pixel values; animation maps motioncontrol parameters to trajectory values. Because these mapping functions are usually multidimensional, nonlinear, and discontinuous, #nding input parameters that yield desirable output values is often a painful process of manual tweaking. Interactiveevolution and inverse design are two general methodologies for computerassisted parameter setting in which the computer plays a prominent role. In this paper we present another such methodology.
Spectral Partitioning Works: Planar graphs and finite element meshes
 In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
, 1996
"... Spectral partitioning methods use the Fiedler vectorthe eigenvector of the secondsmallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrixto find a small separator of a graph. These methods are important components of many scientific numerical algorithms and have been demonstrated by experiment to work extr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 201 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Spectral partitioning methods use the Fiedler vectorthe eigenvector of the secondsmallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrixto find a small separator of a graph. These methods are important components of many scientific numerical algorithms and have been demonstrated by experiment to work extremely well. In this paper, we show that spectral partitioning methods work well on boundeddegree planar graphs and finite element meshes the classes of graphs to which they are usually applied. While naive spectral bisection does not necessarily work, we prove that spectral partitioning techniques can be used to produce separators whose ratio of vertices removed to edges cut is O( p n) for boundeddegree planar graphs and twodimensional meshes and O i n 1=d j for wellshaped ddimensional meshes. The heart of our analysis is an upper bound on the secondsmallest eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrices of these graphs. 1. Introduction Spectral partitioning has become one of the mos...
The ISPD98 Circuit Benchmark Suite
 Proc. ACM/IEEE Int’l Symp. Physical Design (ISPD 99), ACM
, 1998
"... From 19851993, the MCNC regularly introduced and maintained circuit benchmarks for use by the Design Automation community. However, during the last five years, no new circuits have been introduced that can be used for developing fundamental physical design applications, such as partitioning and pla ..."
Abstract

Cited by 145 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
From 19851993, the MCNC regularly introduced and maintained circuit benchmarks for use by the Design Automation community. However, during the last five years, no new circuits have been introduced that can be used for developing fundamental physical design applications, such as partitioning and placement. The largest circuit in the existing set of benchmark suites has over 100,000 modules, but the second largest has just over 25,000 modules, which is small by today’s standards. This paper introduces the ISPD98 benchmark suite which consists of 18 circuits with sizes ranging from 13,000 to 210,000 modules. Experimental results for three existing partitioners are presented so that future researchers in partitioning can more easily evaluate their heuristics. 1
On Modularity Clustering
, 2008
"... Modularity is a recently introduced quality measure for graph clusterings. It has immediately received considerable attention in several disciplines, and in particular in the complex systems literature, although its properties are not well understood. We study the problem of finding clusterings wit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 145 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Modularity is a recently introduced quality measure for graph clusterings. It has immediately received considerable attention in several disciplines, and in particular in the complex systems literature, although its properties are not well understood. We study the problem of finding clusterings with maximum modularity, thus providing theoretical foundations for past and present work based on this measure. More precisely, we prove the conjectured hardness of maximizing modularity both in the general case and with the restriction to cuts, and give an Integer Linear Programming formulation. This is complemented by first insights into the behavior and performance of the commonly applied greedy agglomerative approach.
Multilevel Circuit Partitioning
 IN PROC. OF THE 34TH ACM/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE
, 1998
"... Many previous works in partitioning have used some underlying clustering algorithm to improve performance. As problem sizes reach new levels of complexity, a single application of a clustering algorithm is insufficient to produce excellent solutions. Recent work has illustrated the promise of multi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 91 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Many previous works in partitioning have used some underlying clustering algorithm to improve performance. As problem sizes reach new levels of complexity, a single application of a clustering algorithm is insufficient to produce excellent solutions. Recent work has illustrated the promise of multilevel approaches. A multilevel partitioning algorithm recursively clusters the instance until its size is smaller than a given threshold, then unclusters the instance while applying a partitioning refinement algorithm. In this paper, we propose a new multilevel partitioning algorithm that exploits some of the latest innovations of classical iterative partitioning approaches. Our method also uses a new technique to control the number of levels in our matchingbased clustering algorithm. Experimental results show that our heuristic outperforms numerous existing bipartitioning heuristics with improvements ranging from 6.9 to 27.9 % for 100 runs and 3.0 to 20.6 % for just ten runs (while also using less CPU time). Further, our algorithm generates solutions better than the best known mincut bipartitionings for seven of the ACM/SIGDA benchmark circuits, including golem3 (which has over 100 000 cells). We also present quadrisection results which compare favorably to the partitionings obtained by the GORDIAN cell placement tool. Our work in multilevel quadrisection has been used as the basis for an effective cell placement package.
Spectral Partitioning: The More Eigenvectors, the Better
 PROC. ACM/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONF
, 1995
"... The graph partitioning problem is to divide the vertices of a graph into disjoint clusters to minimize the total cost of the edges cut by the clusters. A spectral partitioning heuristic uses the graph's eigenvectors to construct a geometric representation of the graph (e.g., linear orderings) w ..."
Abstract

Cited by 77 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The graph partitioning problem is to divide the vertices of a graph into disjoint clusters to minimize the total cost of the edges cut by the clusters. A spectral partitioning heuristic uses the graph's eigenvectors to construct a geometric representation of the graph (e.g., linear orderings) which are subsequently partitioned. Our main result shows that when all the eigenvectors are used, graph partitioning reduces to a new vector partitioning problem. This result implies that as many eigenvectors as are practically possible should be used to construct a solution. This philosophy isincontrast to that of the widelyused spectral bipartitioning (SB) heuristic (which uses a single eigenvector to construct a 2way partitioning) and several previous multiway partitioning heuristics [7][10][16][26][37] (which usek eigenvectors to construct a kway partitioning). Our result motivates a simple ordering heuristic that is a multipleeigenvector extension of SB. This heuristic not only signi cantly outperforms SB, but can also yield excellent multiway VLSI circuit partitionings as compared to [1] [10]. Our experiments suggest that the vector partitioning perspective opens the door to new and effective heuristics.
HypergraphPartitioning Based Decomposition for Parallel SparseMatrix Vector Multiplication
 IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Computing
"... In this work, we show that the standard graphpartitioning based decomposition of sparse matrices does not reflect the actual communication volume requirement for parallel matrixvector multiplication. We propose two computational hypergraph models which avoid this crucial deficiency of the graph mo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 74 (35 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
In this work, we show that the standard graphpartitioning based decomposition of sparse matrices does not reflect the actual communication volume requirement for parallel matrixvector multiplication. We propose two computational hypergraph models which avoid this crucial deficiency of the graph model. The proposed models reduce the decomposition problem to the wellknown hypergraph partitioning problem. The recently proposed successful multilevel framework is exploited to develop a multilevel hypergraph partitioning tool PaToH for the experimental verification of our proposed hypergraph models. Experimental results on a wide range of realistic sparse test matrices confirm the validity of the proposed hypergraph models. In the decomposition of the test matrices, the hypergraph models using PaToH and hMeTiS result in up to 63% less communication volume (30%38% less on the average) than the graph model using MeTiS, while PaToH is only 1.32.3 times slower than MeTiS on the average. ...
Relationshipbased Clustering and Cluster Ensembles for Highdimensional Data Mining
, 2002
"... ..."
An Evaluation of Bipartitioning Techniques
 IEEE Transactions on ComputerAided Design
, 1997
"... Abstract — Logic partitioning is an important issue in VLSI CAD, and has been an area of active research for at least the last 25 years. Numerous approaches have been developed and many different techniques have been combined for a wide range of applications. In this paper, we examine many of the ex ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract — Logic partitioning is an important issue in VLSI CAD, and has been an area of active research for at least the last 25 years. Numerous approaches have been developed and many different techniques have been combined for a wide range of applications. In this paper, we examine many of the existing techniques for logic bipartitioning and present a methodology for determining the best mix of approaches. The result is a novel bipartitioning algorithm that includes both new and preexisting techniques. Our algorithm produces results that are at least 16% better than the state of the art while also being efficient in run time. I.