Results 1  10
of
34
On the computational content of the axiom of choice
 The Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1998
"... We present a possible computational content of the negative translation of classical analysis with the Axiom of Choice. Our interpretation seems computationally more direct than the one based on Godel's Dialectica interpretation [10, 18]. Interestingly, thisinterpretation uses a re nement of th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a possible computational content of the negative translation of classical analysis with the Axiom of Choice. Our interpretation seems computationally more direct than the one based on Godel's Dialectica interpretation [10, 18]. Interestingly, thisinterpretation uses a re nement of the realizibility semantics of the absurdity proposition, which is not interpreted as the empty type here. We alsoshowhow to compute witnesses from proofs in classical analysis, and how to interpret the axiom of Dependent Choice and Spector's Double Negation Shift.
The Structure of Complete Degrees
, 1990
"... This paper surveys investigations into how strong these commonalities are. More concretely, we are concerned with: What do NPcomplete sets look like? To what extent are the properties of particular NPcomplete sets, e.g., SAT, shared by all NPcomplete sets? If there are are structural differences ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper surveys investigations into how strong these commonalities are. More concretely, we are concerned with: What do NPcomplete sets look like? To what extent are the properties of particular NPcomplete sets, e.g., SAT, shared by all NPcomplete sets? If there are are structural differences between NPcomplete sets, what are they and what explains the differences? We make these questions, and the analogous questions for other complexity classes, more precise below. We need first to formalize NPcompleteness. There are a number of competing definitions of NPcompleteness. (See [Har78a, p. 7] for a discussion.) The most common, and the one we use, is based on the notion of mreduction, also known as polynomialtime manyone reduction and Karp reduction. A set A is mreducible to B if and only if there is a (total) polynomialtime computable function f such that for all x, x 2 A () f(x) 2 B: (1) 1
The fundamental theorem of algebra: a constructive development without choice
 Pacific Journal of Mathematics
, 2000
"... Is it reasonable to do constructive mathematics without the axiom of countable choice? Serious schools of constructive mathematics all assume it one way or another, but the arguments for it are not compelling. The fundamental theorem of algebra will serve as an example of where countable choice come ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Is it reasonable to do constructive mathematics without the axiom of countable choice? Serious schools of constructive mathematics all assume it one way or another, but the arguments for it are not compelling. The fundamental theorem of algebra will serve as an example of where countable choice comes into play andhow to proceedin its absence. Along the way, a notion of a complete metric space, suitable for a choiceless environment, is developed. By constructive mathematics I mean, essentially, mathematics that is developed along the lines proposed by Errett Bishop [1]. More precisely, I mean mathematics that is done in the context of intuitionistic logic — without the lawof excluded middle. My reasons for identifying these notions are discussed in [9] and [10], the basic contention being that constructive mathematics has the same subject matter as classical mathematics. Ruitenburg [11] treated the fundamental theorem of algebra in a choiceless
The Mathematical Development Of Set Theory  From Cantor To Cohen
 The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
, 1996
"... This article is dedicated to Professor Burton Dreben on his coming of age. I owe him particular thanks for his careful reading and numerous suggestions for improvement. My thanks go also to Jose Ruiz and the referee for their helpful comments. Parts of this account were given at the 1995 summer meet ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This article is dedicated to Professor Burton Dreben on his coming of age. I owe him particular thanks for his careful reading and numerous suggestions for improvement. My thanks go also to Jose Ruiz and the referee for their helpful comments. Parts of this account were given at the 1995 summer meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic at Haifa, in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology logic seminar, and to the Paris Logic Group. The author would like to express his thanks to the various organizers, as well as his gratitude to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for its hospitality during the preparation of this article in the autumn of 1995.
Näıve computational type theory
 Proof and SystemReliability, Proceedings of International Summer School Marktoberdorf, July 24 to August 5, 2001, volume 62 of NATO Science Series III
, 2002
"... ..."
(Show Context)
The Mathematical Import Of Zermelo's WellOrdering Theorem
 Bull. Symbolic Logic
, 1997
"... this paper, the seminal results of set theory are woven together in terms of a unifying mathematical motif, one whose transmutations serve to illuminate the historical development of the subject. The motif is foreshadowed in Cantor's diagonal proof, and emerges in the interstices of the inclusi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
this paper, the seminal results of set theory are woven together in terms of a unifying mathematical motif, one whose transmutations serve to illuminate the historical development of the subject. The motif is foreshadowed in Cantor's diagonal proof, and emerges in the interstices of the inclusion vs. membership distinction, a distinction only clarified at the turn of this century, remarkable though this may seem. Russell runs with this distinction, but is quickly caught on the horns of his wellknown paradox, an early expression of our motif. The motif becomes fully manifest through the study of functions f :
Is the Continuum Hypothesis a definite mathematical problem?
"... [t]he analysis of the phrase “how many ” unambiguously leads to a definite meaning for the question [“How many different sets of integers do their exist?”]: the problem is to find out which one of the א’s is the number of points of a straight line … Cantor, after having proved that this number is gr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
[t]he analysis of the phrase “how many ” unambiguously leads to a definite meaning for the question [“How many different sets of integers do their exist?”]: the problem is to find out which one of the א’s is the number of points of a straight line … Cantor, after having proved that this number is greater than א0, conjectured that it is א1. An equivalent proposition is this: any infinite subset of the continuum has the power either of the set of integers or of the whole continuum. This is Cantor’s continuum hypothesis. … But, although Cantor’s set theory has now had a development of more than sixty years and the [continuum] problem is evidently of great importance for it, nothing has been proved so far relative to the question of what the power of the continuum is or whether its subsets satisfy the condition just stated, except that … it is true for a certain infinitesimal fraction of these subsets, [namely] the analytic sets. Not even an upper bound, however high, can be assigned for the power of the continuum. It is undecided whether this number is regular or singular, accessible or inaccessible, and (except for König’s negative result) what its character of cofinality is. Gödel 1947, 516517 [in Gödel 1990, 178]
Every PolynomialTime 1Degree Collapses iff P = PSPACE
, 1996
"... A set A is mreducible (or Karpreducible) to B iff there is a polynomialtime computable function f such that, for all x, x 2 A () f(x) 2 B. Two sets are: ffl 1equivalent iff each is mreducible to the other by oneone reductions; ffl pinvertible equivalent iff each is mreducible to the othe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A set A is mreducible (or Karpreducible) to B iff there is a polynomialtime computable function f such that, for all x, x 2 A () f(x) 2 B. Two sets are: ffl 1equivalent iff each is mreducible to the other by oneone reductions; ffl pinvertible equivalent iff each is mreducible to the other by oneone, polynomialtime invertible reductions; and ffl pisomorphic iff there is an mreduction from one set to the other that is oneone, onto, and polynomialtime invertible. In this paper we show the following characterization. Theorem The following are equivalent: (a) P = PSPACE. (b) Every two 1equivalent sets are pisomorphic. (c) Every two pinvertible equivalent sets are pisomorphic. 2 1. Overview If A is mreducible to B, we usually interpret this to mean that A is computationally no more difficult than B, since a procedure for computing B is easily converted into a procedure for computing A of comparable complexity. In fact, this interpretation is supported by muc...
A regular completion for the variety generated by the threeelement Heyting algebra
 Houston J. Math
, 2008
"... Abstract. We show that the variety generated by the threeelement Heyting algebra admits a meet dense, regular completion even though it is not closed under MacNeille completions. 1. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show that the variety generated by the threeelement Heyting algebra admits a meet dense, regular completion even though it is not closed under MacNeille completions. 1.