Results 1 
4 of
4
Publickey cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes
 IN ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY — EUROCRYPT 1999
, 1999
"... Abstract. This paper investigates a novel computational problem, namely the Composite Residuosity Class Problem, and its applications to publickey cryptography. We propose a new trapdoor mechanism and derive from this technique three encryption schemes: a trapdoor permutation and two homomorphic pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 614 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper investigates a novel computational problem, namely the Composite Residuosity Class Problem, and its applications to publickey cryptography. We propose a new trapdoor mechanism and derive from this technique three encryption schemes: a trapdoor permutation and two homomorphic probabilistic encryption schemes computationally comparable to RSA. Our cryptosystems, based on usual modular arithmetics, are provably secure under appropriate assumptions in the standard model. 1
The Relationship Between Breaking the DiffieHellman Protocol and Computing Discrete Logarithms
, 1998
"... Both uniform and nonuniform results concerning the security of the DiffieHellman keyexchange protocol are proved. First, it is shown that in a cyclic group G of order jGj = Q p e i i , where all the multiple prime factors of jGj are polynomial in log jGj, there exists an algorithm that re ..."
Abstract

Cited by 38 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Both uniform and nonuniform results concerning the security of the DiffieHellman keyexchange protocol are proved. First, it is shown that in a cyclic group G of order jGj = Q p e i i , where all the multiple prime factors of jGj are polynomial in log jGj, there exists an algorithm that reduces the computation of discrete logarithms in G to breaking the DiffieHellman protocol in G and has complexity p maxf(p i )g \Delta (log jGj) O(1) , where (p) stands for the minimum of the set of largest prime factors of all the numbers d in the interval [p \Gamma 2 p p+1; p+2 p p+ 1]. Under the unproven but plausible assumption that (p) is polynomial in log p, this reduction implies that the DiffieHellman problem and the discrete logarithm problem are polynomialtime equivalent in G. Second, it is proved that the DiffieHellman problem and the discrete logarithm problem are equivalent in a uniform sense for groups whose orders belong to certain classes: there exists a p...
DiffieHellman Oracles
 ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY  CRYPTO '96 , LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1996
"... This paper consists of three parts. First, various types of DiffieHellman oracles for a cyclic group G and subgroups of G are defined and their equivalence is proved. In particular, the security of using a subgroup of G instead of G in the DiffieHellman protocol is investigated. Second, we derive ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper consists of three parts. First, various types of DiffieHellman oracles for a cyclic group G and subgroups of G are defined and their equivalence is proved. In particular, the security of using a subgroup of G instead of G in the DiffieHellman protocol is investigated. Second, we derive several new conditions for the polynomialtime equivalence of breaking the DiffieHellman protocol and computing discrete logarithms in G which extend former results by den Boer and Maurer. Finally, efficient constructions of DiffieHellman groups with provable equivalence are described.
On the statistical properties of Diffie–Hellman distributions
 MR 2001k:11258 Zbl 0997.11066
"... Let p be a large prime such that p−1 has some large prime factors, and let ϑ ∈ Z ∗ p be an rth power residue for all small factors of p − 1. The corresponding DiffieHellman (DH) distribution is (ϑ x, ϑ y, ϑ xy) where x, y are randomly chosen from Z ∗ p. A recently formulated assumption is that giv ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Let p be a large prime such that p−1 has some large prime factors, and let ϑ ∈ Z ∗ p be an rth power residue for all small factors of p − 1. The corresponding DiffieHellman (DH) distribution is (ϑ x, ϑ y, ϑ xy) where x, y are randomly chosen from Z ∗ p. A recently formulated assumption is that given p, ϑ of the above form it is infeasible to distinguish in reasonable time between DH distribution and triples of numbers chosen