Let S be some type system. A typing in S for a typable term M is the collection of all of the information other than M which appears in the final judgement of a proof derivation showing that M is typable. For example, suppose there is a derivation in S ending with the judgement A M : # meaning that M has result type # when assuming the types of free variables are given by A. Then (A, #) is a typing for M .

A notion of type assignment on Curryfied Term Rewriting Systems is introduced that uses Intersection Types of Rank 2, and in which all function symbols are assumed to have a type. Type assignment will consist of specifying derivation rules that describe how types can be assigned to terms, using the types of function symbols. Using a modified unification procedure, for each term the principal pair (of basis and type) will be defined in the following sense: from these all admissible pairs can be generated by chains of operations on pairs, consisting of the operations substitution, copying, and weakening. In general, given an arbitrary typeable CuTRS, the subject reduction property does not hold. Using the principal type for the left-hand side of a rewrite rule, a sufficient and decidable condition will be formulated that typeable rewrite rules should satisfy in order to obtain this property. Introduction In the recent years, several paradigms have been investigated for the implementatio...

Types are often used to control and analyze computer programs.

In this paper we introduce Curryfied Term Rewriting Systems, and a notion of partial type assignment on terms and rewrite rules that uses intersection types with sorts and !. Three operations on types -- substitution, expansion, and lifting -- are used to define type assignment, and are proved to be sound. With this result the system is proved closed for reduction. Using a more liberal approach to recursion, we define a general scheme for recursive definitions and prove that, for all systems that satisfy this scheme, every term typeable without using the type-constant ! is strongly normalizable. We also show that, under certain restrictions, all typeable terms have a (weak) head-normal form, and that terms whose type does not contain ! are normalizable.

We present a new system of intersection types for a composition-free calculus of explicit substitutions with a rule for garbage collection, and show that it characterizes those terms which are strongly normalizing. This system extends previous work on the natural generalization of the classical intersection types system, which characterized head normalization and weak normalization, but was not complete for strong normalization. An important role is played by the notion of available variable in a term, which is a generalization of the classical notion of free variable.

System E is a recently designed type system for the #- calculus with intersection types and expansion variables. During automatic type inference, expansion variables allow postponing decisions about which non-syntax-driven typing rules to use until the right information is available and allow implementing the choices via substitution.

This paper defines reduction on derivations (cut-elimination) in the Strict Intersection Type Assignment System of [1] and shows a strong normalisation result for this reduction. Using this result, new proofs are given for the approximation theorem and the characterisation of normalisability of terms, using intersection types.

Although systems with intersection types have many unique capabilities, there has never been a fully satisfactory explicitly typed system with intersection types. We introduce and prove the basic properties of # , a typed #-calculus with branching types and types with quantification over type selection parameters. The new system # an explicitly typed system with the same expressiveness as a system with intersection types. Typing derivations in # use branching types to squash together what would be separate parallel derivations in earlier systems with intersection types.

We give a proof for the strong normalization result in the intersection type discipline, which we obtain by putting together some well-known results and proof techniques. Our proof uses a variant of Klop's extended -calculus, for which it is shown that strong normalization is equivalent to weak normalization. This is

The distinction between the conjunctive nature of non-determinism as opposed to the disjunctive character of parallelism constitutes the motivation and the starting point of the present work. λ-calculus is extended with both a non-deterministic choice and a parallel operator; a notion of reduction is introduced, extending fi-reduction of the classical calculus. We study type assignment systems for this calculus, together with a denotational semantics which is initially defined constructing a set semimodel via simple types. We enrich the type system with intersection and union types, dually reflecting the disjunctive and conjunctive behaviour of the operators, and we build a filter model. The theory of this model is compared both with a Morris-style operational semantics and with a semantics based on a notion of capabilities.