Symbolic Model Checking [3, 14] has proven to be a powerful technique for the verification of reactive systems. BDDs [2] have traditionally been used as a symbolic representation of the system. In this paper we show how boolean decision procedures, like Stalmarck's Method [16] or the Davis & Putnam Procedure [7], can replace BDDs. This new technique avoids the space blow up of BDDs, generates counterexamples much faster, and sometimes speeds up the verification. In addition, it produces counterexamples of minimal length. We introduce a bounded model checking procedure for LTL which reduces model checking to propositional satisfiability. We show that bounded LTL model checking can be done without a tableau construction. We have implemented a model checker BMC, based on bounded model checking, and preliminary results are presented.

In this paper, we study the application of propositional decision procedures in hardware verification. In particular, we apply bounded model checking, as introduced in [1], to equivalence and invariant checking. We present several optimizations that reduce the size of generated propositional formulas. In many instances, our SAT-based approach can significantly outperform BDD-based approaches. We observe that SAT-based techniques are particularly efficient in detecting errors in both combinational and sequential designs. 1

The temporal logic model checking algorithm of Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla [17] is modified to represent state graphs using binary decision diagrams (BDD’s) [7] and partitioned trunsirion relations [lo], 1111. Because this representation captures some of the regularity in the state space of circuits with data path logic, we are able to verify circuits with an extremely large number of states. We demonstrate this new technique on a synchronous pipelined design with approximately 5 x 10^120 states. Our model checking algorithm handles full CTL with fairness constraints. Consequently, we are able to express a number of important liveness and fairness properties, which would otherwise not be expressible in CTL. We give empirical results on the performance of the algorithm applied to both synchronous and asynchronous circuits with data path logic.

McMillan has recently proposed a new technique to avoid the state explosion problem in the verification of systems modelled with finite-state Petri nets. The technique requires to construct a finite initial part of the unfolding of the net. McMillan's algorithm for this task may yield initial parts that are larger than necessary (exponentially larger in the worst case). We present a refinement of the algorithm which overcomes this problem. 1 Introduction In a seminal paper [10], McMillan has proposed a new technique to avoid the state explosion problem in the verification of systems modelled with finite-state Petri nets. The technique is based on the concept of net unfolding, a well known partial order semantics of Petri nets introduced in [12], and later described in more detail in [4] under the name of branching processes. The unfolding of a net is another net, usually infinite but with a simpler structure. McMillan proposes an algorithm for the construction of a finite initial part...

The phrase model checking refers to algorithms for exploring the state space of a transition system to determine if it obeys a specification of its intended behavior. These algorithms can perform exhaustive verification in a highly automatic manner, and, thus, have attracted much interest in industry. Model checking programs are now being commercially marketed. However, model checking has been held back by the state explosion problem, which is the problem that the number of states in a system grows exponentially in the number of system components. Much research has been devoted to ameliorating this problem.

We show how LTL model checking can be reduced to CTL model checking with fairness constraints. Using this reduction, we also describe how to construct a symbolic LTL model checker that appears to be quite efficient in practice. In particular, we show how the SMV model checking system developed by McMillan [16] can be extended to permit LTL specifications. The results that we have obtained are quite surprising. For the examples we considered, the LTL model checker required at most twice as much time and space as the CTL model checker. Although additional examples still need to be tried, it appears that efficient LTL model checking is possible when the specifications are not excessively complicated. This research was sponsored in part by the Avionics Laboratory, Wright Research and Development Center, Aeronautical Systems Division (AFSC), U.S. Air Force, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-6543 under Contract F33615-90-C-1465, ARPA Order No. 7597 and in part by the National Science foundat...

Asynchronous design has enjoyed a revival of interest recently, as designers seek to eliminate penalties of traditional synchronous design. In principle, asynchronous methods promise to avoid overhead due to clock skew, worst-case design assumptions and resynchronization of asynchronous external inputs. In practice, however, many asynchronous design methods suffer from a number of problems: unsound algorithms (implementations may have hazards), harsh restrictions on the range of designs that can be handled (single-input changes only), incompatibility with existing design styles and inefficiency in the resulting circuits. This thesis presents a new locally-clocked design method for the synthesis of asynchronous controllers. The method has been automated, is proven correct and produces high-performance implementations which are hazard-free at the gate-level. Implementations allow multiple-input changes and handle a relatively unconstrained class of behaviors (called "burst-mode" specifications). The method produces state-machine implementations with a minimal or near-minimal number of states. Implementations can be easily built in such common VLSI design styles as gate-array, standard cell and full-custom. Realizations typically have the latency of

Unfoldings of Petri nets provide a method of searching the state space of concurrent systems without considering all possible interleavings of concurrent events. A procedure is given for constructing the unfolding of a Petri net, terminating the construction when it is sufficient to represent all reachable markings. This procedure is applied to hazard and deadlock detection in asynchronous circuits. Examples are given of scalable systems with exponential size state spaces, but polynomial size unfoldings, including a distributed mutual exclusion ring circuit.

Abstract not found

Abstract not found