This paper describes a method for transforming any given set of Datalog rules into an efficient specialized implementation with guaranteed worst-case time and space complexities, and for computing the complexities from the rules. The running time is optimal in the sense that only useful combinations of facts that lead to all hypotheses of a rule being simultaneously true are considered, and each such combination is considered exactly once. The associated space usage is optimal in that it is the minimum space needed for such consideration modulo scheduling optimizations that may eliminate some summands in the space usage formula. The transformation is based on a general method for algorithm design that exploits fixed-point computation, incremental maintenance of invariants, and combinations of indexed and linked data structures. We apply the method to a number of analysis problems, some with improved algorithm complexities and all with greatly improved algorithm understanding and greatly simplified complexity analysis.

Object abstraction supports the separation of what operations are provided by systems and components from how the operations are implemented, and is essential in enabling the construction of complex systems from components. Unfortunately, clear and modular implementations have poor performance when expensive query operations are repeated, while efficient implementations that incrementally maintain these query results are much more difficult to develop and to understand, because the code blows up significantly, and is no longer clear or modular. This paper describes a powerful and systematic method that first allows the “what ” of each component to be specified in a clear and modular fashion and implemented straightforwardly in an object-oriented language; then analyzes the queries and updates, across object abstraction, in the straightforward implementation; and finally derives the sophisticated and efficient “how ” of each component by incrementally maintaining the results of repeated expensive queries with respect to updates to their parameters. Our implementation and experimental results for example applications in query optimization, role-based access control, etc. demonstrate the effectiveness and benefit of the method.

An aggregate array computation is a loop that computes accumulated quantities over array elements. Such computations are common in programs that use arrays, and the array elements involved in such computations often overlap, especially across iterations of loops, resulting in significant redundancy in the overall computation. This paper presents a method and algorithms that eliminate such overlapping aggregate array redundancies and shows analytical and experimental performance improvements. The method is based on incrementalization, i.e., updating the values of aggregate array computations from iteration to iteration rather than computing them from scratch in each iteration. This involves maintaining additional values not maintained in the original program. We reduce various analysis problems to solving inequality constraints on loop variables and array subscripts, and we apply results from work on array data dependence analysis. For aggregate array computations that have significant redundancy, incrementalization produces drastic speedup compared to previous optimizations; when there is little redundancy, the benefit might be offset by cache effects and other factors. Previous methods for loop optimizations of arrays do not perform incrementalization, and previous techniques for loop incrementalization do not handle arrays. 1

Redundant call elimination has been an important program optimisation process as it can produce super-linear speedup in optimised programs. In this paper, we investigate use of the tupling transformation in achieving this optimisation over a first-order functional language. Standard tupling technique, as described in [6], works excellently in a restricted variant of the language; namely, functions with single recursion argument. We provide a semantic understanding of call redundancy, upon which we construct an analysis for handling the tupling of functions with multiple recursion arguments. The analysis provides a means to ensure termination of the tupling transformation. As the analysis is of polynomial complexity, it makes the tupling suitable as a step in compiler optimisation.

Abstract not found