Results 1 
6 of
6
A Linear Logical Framework
, 1996
"... We present the linear type theory LLF as the forAppeared in the proceedings of the Eleventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science  LICS'96 (E. Clarke editor), pp. 264275, New Brunswick, NJ, July 2730 1996. mal basis for a conservative extension of the LF logical framework. LLF c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 217 (44 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present the linear type theory LLF as the forAppeared in the proceedings of the Eleventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science  LICS'96 (E. Clarke editor), pp. 264275, New Brunswick, NJ, July 2730 1996. mal basis for a conservative extension of the LF logical framework. LLF combines the expressive power of dependent types with linear logic to permit the natural and concise representation of a whole new class of deductive systems, namely those dealing with state. As an example we encode a version of MiniML with references including its type system, its operational semantics, and a proof of type preservation. Another example is the encoding of a sequent calculus for classical linear logic and its cut elimination theorem. LLF can also be given an operational interpretation as a logic programming language under which the representations above can be used for type inference, evaluation and cutelimination. 1 Introduction A logical framework is a formal system desig...
A Coverage Checking Algorithm for LF
, 2003
"... Coverage checking is the problem of deciding whether any closed term of a given type is an instance of at least one of a given set of patterns. It can be used to verify if a function defined by pattern matching covers all possible cases. This problem has a straightforward solution for the first ..."
Abstract

Cited by 40 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Coverage checking is the problem of deciding whether any closed term of a given type is an instance of at least one of a given set of patterns. It can be used to verify if a function defined by pattern matching covers all possible cases. This problem has a straightforward solution for the firstorder, simplytyped case, but is in general undecidable in the presence of dependent types. In this paper we present a terminating algorithm for verifying coverage of higherorder, dependently typed patterns.
Constructions, Inductive Types and Strong Normalization
, 1993
"... This thesis contains an investigation of Coquand's Calculus of Constructions, a basic impredicative Type Theory. We review syntactic properties of the calculus, in particular decidability of equality and typechecking, based on the equalityasjudgement presentation. We present a settheoretic notio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This thesis contains an investigation of Coquand's Calculus of Constructions, a basic impredicative Type Theory. We review syntactic properties of the calculus, in particular decidability of equality and typechecking, based on the equalityasjudgement presentation. We present a settheoretic notion of model, CCstructures, and use this to give a new strong normalization proof based on a modification of the realizability interpretation. An extension of the core calculus by inductive types is investigated and we show, using the example of infinite trees, how the realizability semantics and the strong normalization argument can be extended to nonalgebraic inductive types. We emphasize that our interpretation is sound for large eliminations, e.g. allows the definition of sets by recursion. Finally we apply the extended calculus to a nontrivial problem: the formalization of the strong normalization argument for Girard's System F. This formal proof has been developed and checked using the...
Residual theory in λcalculus: A formal development
 Journal of Functional Programming
, 1994
"... Abstract. We present the complete development, in Gallina, of the residual theory of βreduction in pure λcalculus. The main result is the Prism Theorem, and its corollary Lévy’s Cube Lemma, a strong form of the parallelmoves lemma, itself a key step towards the confluence theorem and its usual co ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present the complete development, in Gallina, of the residual theory of βreduction in pure λcalculus. The main result is the Prism Theorem, and its corollary Lévy’s Cube Lemma, a strong form of the parallelmoves lemma, itself a key step towards the confluence theorem and its usual corollaries (ChurchRosser, uniqueness of normal forms). Gallina is the specification language of the Coq Proof Assistant[7, 11]. It is a specific concrete syntax for its abstract framework, the Calculus of Inductive Constructions[15]. It may be thought of as a smooth mixture of higherorder predicate calculus with recursive definitions, inductively defined datatypes, and inductive predicate definitions reminiscent of logic programming. The development presented here was fully checked in the current distribution version Coq V5.8. We just state the lemmas in the order in which they are proved, omitting the proof justifications. The full transcript is available as a standard library in the distribution of Coq. 1
A Formalization of the Strong Normalization Proof for System F in LEGO
, 1993
"... We describe a complete formalization of a strong normalization proof for the Curry style presentation of System F in LEGO. The underlying type theory is the Calculus of Constructions enriched by inductive types. The proof follows Girard et al [GLT89], i.e. we use the notion of candidates of reducibi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a complete formalization of a strong normalization proof for the Curry style presentation of System F in LEGO. The underlying type theory is the Calculus of Constructions enriched by inductive types. The proof follows Girard et al [GLT89], i.e. we use the notion of candidates of reducibility, but we make essential use of general inductive types to simplify the presentation. We discuss extensions and variations of the proof: the extraction of a normalization function, the use of saturated sets instead of candidates, and the extension to a Church Style presentation. We conclude with some general observations about Computer Aided Formal Reasoning.
Mechanized Operational Semantics via (Co)Induction
, 1999
"... We give a fully automated description of a small programming language in the theorem prover Isabelle98. The language syntax and semantics are encoded, and we formally verify a range of semantic properties. This is achieved via uniform (co)inductive methods. Keywords: automated deduction, tactical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We give a fully automated description of a small programming language in the theorem prover Isabelle98. The language syntax and semantics are encoded, and we formally verify a range of semantic properties. This is achieved via uniform (co)inductive methods. Keywords: automated deduction, tactical theorem proving (Isabelle), operational semantics, induction and coinduction, software specification and verification. Submitted for publication. 1 Introduction The design of new programming languages which are wellprincipled, reliable and expressive is an important part of Computer Science. In this paper we contribute towards the techniques for specification, design and development of programming languages by specifying and verifying properties of a core language, using tactical verification within the theorem prover Isabelle 98. We show how this can be done uniformly, so that our methodology readily adapts to new languages, using suitable variations of standard methods to ensure rapid m...