Results 1 -
2 of
2
On the n-back-and-forth types of Boolean algebras
- In preparation
"... Abstract. The objective of this paper is to uncover the structure of the back-andforth equivalence classes at the finite levels for the class of Boolean algebras. As an application, we obtain bounds on the computational complexity of determining the back-and-forth equivalence classes of a Boolean al ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The objective of this paper is to uncover the structure of the back-andforth equivalence classes at the finite levels for the class of Boolean algebras. As an application, we obtain bounds on the computational complexity of determining the back-and-forth equivalence classes of a Boolean algebra for finite levels. This result has implications for characterizing the relatively intrinsically Σ 0 n relations of Boolean algebras as existential formulas over a finite set of relations. 1.
COUNTING THE BACK-AND-FORTH TYPES
"... Abstract. Given a class of structures K and n ∈ ω, we study the dichotomy between there being countably many n-back-and-forth equivalence classes and there being continuum many. In the latter case we show that, relative to some oracle, every set can be weakly coded in the (n − 1)st jump of some stru ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Given a class of structures K and n ∈ ω, we study the dichotomy between there being countably many n-back-and-forth equivalence classes and there being continuum many. In the latter case we show that, relative to some oracle, every set can be weakly coded in the (n − 1)st jump of some structure in K. In the former case we show that there is a countable set of infinitary Πn relations that captures all of the Πn information about the structures in K. In most cases where there are countably many n-back-and-forth equivalence classes, there is a computable description of them. We will show how to use this computable description to get a complete set of computably infinitary Πn formulas. This will allow us to completely characterize the relatively intrinsically Σ 0 n+1 relations in the computable structures of K, and to prove that no Turing degree can be coded by the (n − 1)st jump of any structure in K unless that degree is already below 0 (n−1). 1.

