Results 1  10
of
32
An optimal online algorithm for metrical task systems
 Journal of the ACM
, 1992
"... Abstract. In practice, almost all dynamic systems require decisions to be made online, without full knowledge of their future impact on the system. A general model for the processing of sequences of tasks is introduced, and a general online decnion algorithm is developed. It is shown that, for an ..."
Abstract

Cited by 186 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In practice, almost all dynamic systems require decisions to be made online, without full knowledge of their future impact on the system. A general model for the processing of sequences of tasks is introduced, and a general online decnion algorithm is developed. It is shown that, for an important algorithms. class of special cases, this algorithm is optimal among all online Specifically, a task system (S. d) for processing sequences of tasks consists of a set S of states and a cost matrix d where d(i, j) is the cost of changing from state i to state j (we assume that d satisfies the triangle inequality and all diagonal entries are f)). The cost of processing a given task depends on the state of the system. A schedule for a sequence T1, T2,..., Tk of tasks is a ‘equence sl,s~,..., Sk of states where s ~ is the state in which T ’ is processed; the cost of a schedule is the sum of all task processing costs and state transition costs incurred. An online scheduling algorithm is one that chooses s, only knowing T1 Tz ~.. T’. Such an algorithm is wcompetitive if, on any input task sequence, its cost is within an additive constant of w times the optimal offline schedule cost. The competitive ratio w(S, d) is the infimum w for which there is a wcompetitive online scheduling algorithm for (S, d). It is shown that w(S, d) = 2 ISI – 1 for eoery task system in which d is symmetric, and w(S, d) = 0(1 S]2) for every task system. Finally, randomized online scheduling algorithms are introduced. It is shown that for the uniform task system (in which d(i, j) = 1 for all i, j), the expected competitive ratio w(S, d) =
Randomized Competitive Algorithms for the List Update Problem
 Algorithmica
, 1992
"... We prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms for the list update problem of Sleator and Tarjan. We give a simple and elegant randomized algorithm that is more competitive than the best previous randomized algorithm due to Irani. Our algorithm uses randomness only d ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We prove upper and lower bounds on the competitiveness of randomized algorithms for the list update problem of Sleator and Tarjan. We give a simple and elegant randomized algorithm that is more competitive than the best previous randomized algorithm due to Irani. Our algorithm uses randomness only during an initialization phase, and from then on runs completely deterministically. It is the first randomized competitive algorithm with this property to beat the deterministic lower bound. We generalize our approach to a model in which access costs are fixed but update costs are scaled by an arbitrary constant d. We prove lower bounds for deterministic list update algorithms and for randomized algorithms against oblivious and adaptive online adversaries. In particular, we show that for this problem adaptive online and adaptive offline adversaries are equally powerful. 1 Introduction Recently much attention has been given to competitive analysis of online algorithms [7, 20, 22, 25]. Ro...
SelfOrganizing Linear Search
 ACM Computing Surveys
, 1985
"... this article. Two examples of simple permutation algorithms are movetofront, which moves the accessed record to the front of the list, shifting all records previously ahead of it back one position; and transpose, which merely exchanges the accessed record with the one immediately ahead of it in th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this article. Two examples of simple permutation algorithms are movetofront, which moves the accessed record to the front of the list, shifting all records previously ahead of it back one position; and transpose, which merely exchanges the accessed record with the one immediately ahead of it in the list. These will be described in more detail later. Knuth [1973] describes several search methods that are usually more efficient than linear search. Bentley and McGeoch [1985] justify the use of selforganizing linear search in the following three contexts:
A Combined BIT and TIMESTAMP Algorithm for the List Update Problem
 INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS
, 1995
"... We present a randomized online algorithm for the list update problem which achieves a competitive factor of 1.6, the best known so far. The algorithm makes an initial random choice between two known algorithms that have different worstcase request sequences. The first is the BIT algorithm that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a randomized online algorithm for the list update problem which achieves a competitive factor of 1.6, the best known so far. The algorithm makes an initial random choice between two known algorithms that have different worstcase request sequences. The first is the BIT algorithm that, for each item in the list, alternates between moving it to the front of the list and leaving it at its place after it has been requested. The second is a TIMESTAMP algorithm that moves an item in front of less often requested items within the list.
Selfimproving algorithms
 in SODA ’06: Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACMSIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm
"... We investigate ways in which an algorithm can improve its expected performance by finetuning itself automatically with respect to an arbitrary, unknown input distribution. We give such selfimproving algorithms for sorting and computing Delaunay triangulations. The highlights of this work: (i) an al ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate ways in which an algorithm can improve its expected performance by finetuning itself automatically with respect to an arbitrary, unknown input distribution. We give such selfimproving algorithms for sorting and computing Delaunay triangulations. The highlights of this work: (i) an algorithm to sort a list of numbers with optimal expected limiting complexity; and (ii) an algorithm to compute the Delaunay triangulation of a set of points with optimal expected limiting complexity. In both cases, the algorithm begins with a training phase during which it adjusts itself to the input distribution, followed by a stationary regime in which the algorithm settles to its optimized incarnation. 1
Asymptotic approximation of the movetofront search cost distribution and leastrecentlyused caching fault probabilities
, 1999
"... Consider a finite list of items n = 1 � 2 � � � � � N, that are requested according to an i.i.d. process. Each time an item is requested it is moved to the front of the list. The associated search cost C N for accessing an item is equal to its position before being moved. If the request distribu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Consider a finite list of items n = 1 � 2 � � � � � N, that are requested according to an i.i.d. process. Each time an item is requested it is moved to the front of the list. The associated search cost C N for accessing an item is equal to its position before being moved. If the request distribution converges to a proper distribution as N → ∞, then the stationary search cost C N converges in distribution to a limiting search cost C. We show that, when the (limiting) request distribution has a heavy tail (e.g., generalized Zipf’s law), P�R = n � ∼ c/n α as n → ∞, α> 1, then the limiting stationary search cost distribution P�C> n�, or, equivalently, the leastrecently used (LRU) caching fault probability, satisfies P�C> n� lim n→ ∞ P�R> n � =
The Statistical Adversary Allows Optimal MoneyMaking Trading Strategies (Extended Abstract)
, 1993
"... Andrew Chou Jeremy Cooperstock y Ran ElYaniv z Michael Klugerman x Tom Leighton  November, 1993 Abstract The distributional approach and competitive analysis have traditionally been used for the design and analysis of online algorithms. The former assumes a specific distribution on inputs, whil ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Andrew Chou Jeremy Cooperstock y Ran ElYaniv z Michael Klugerman x Tom Leighton  November, 1993 Abstract The distributional approach and competitive analysis have traditionally been used for the design and analysis of online algorithms. The former assumes a specific distribution on inputs, while the latter assumes inputs are chosen by an unrestricted adversary. This paper employs the statistical adversary (recently proposed by Raghavan) to analyze and design online algorithms for twoway currency trading. The statistical adversary approach may be viewed as a hybrid of the distributional approach and competitive analysis. By statistical adversary, we mean an adversary that generates input sequences, where each sequence must satisfy certain general statistical properties. The online algorithms presented in this paper have some very attractive properties. For instance, the algorithms are moneymaking; they are guaranteed to be profitable when the optimal offli...
Average Case Analyses of List Update Algorithms, with Applications to Data Compression
 Algorithmica
, 1998
"... We study the performance of the Timestamp (0) (TS(0)) algorithm for selforganizing sequential search on discrete memoryless sources. We demonstrate that TS(0) is better than Movetofront on such sources, and determine performance ratios for TS(0) against the optimal offline and static adversaries ..."
Abstract

Cited by 21 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the performance of the Timestamp (0) (TS(0)) algorithm for selforganizing sequential search on discrete memoryless sources. We demonstrate that TS(0) is better than Movetofront on such sources, and determine performance ratios for TS(0) against the optimal offline and static adversaries in this situation. Previous work on such sources compared online algorithms only with static adversaries. One practical motivation for our work is the use of the Movetofront heuristic in various compression algorithms. Our theoretical results suggest that in many cases using TS(0) in place of Movetofront in schemes that use the latter should improve compression. Tests using implementations on a standard corpus of test documents demonstrate that TS(0) leads to improved compression.
SelfOrganizing Data Structures
 In
, 1998
"... . We survey results on selforganizing data structures for the search problem and concentrate on two very popular structures: the unsorted linear list, and the binary search tree. For the problem of maintaining unsorted lists, also known as the list update problem, we present results on the competit ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We survey results on selforganizing data structures for the search problem and concentrate on two very popular structures: the unsorted linear list, and the binary search tree. For the problem of maintaining unsorted lists, also known as the list update problem, we present results on the competitiveness achieved by deterministic and randomized online algorithms. For binary search trees, we present results for both online and offline algorithms. Selforganizing data structures can be used to build very effective data compression schemes. We summarize theoretical and experimental results. 1 Introduction This paper surveys results in the design and analysis of selforganizing data structures for the search problem. The general search problem in pointer data structures can be phrased as follows. The elements of a set are stored in a collection of nodes. Each node also contains O(1) pointers to other nodes and additional state data which can be used for navigation and selforganizati...
Offline Algorithms for The List Update Problem
, 1996
"... Optimum offline algorithms for the list update problem are investigated. The list update problem involves implementing a dictionary of items as a linear list. Several characterizations of optimum algorithms are given; these lead to optimum algorithm which runs in time \Theta2 n (n \Gamma 1)!m, wh ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Optimum offline algorithms for the list update problem are investigated. The list update problem involves implementing a dictionary of items as a linear list. Several characterizations of optimum algorithms are given; these lead to optimum algorithm which runs in time \Theta2 n (n \Gamma 1)!m, where n is the length of the list and m is the number of requests. The previous best algorithm, an adaptation of a more general algorithm due to Manasse et al. [9], runs in time \Theta(n!) 2 m. 1 Introduction A dictionary is an abstract data type that stores a collection of keyed items and supports the operations access, insert, and delete. In the sequential search or list update problem, a dictionary is implemented as simple linear list, either stored as a linked collection of items or as an array. An access is done by starting at the front of the list and examining each succeeding item until either finding the item desired or reaching the end of the list and reporting the item not present...