Results 1 -
3 of
3
Demystifying Magic: High-level Low-level Programming
- PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS
, 2009
"... The power of high-level languages lies in their abstraction over hardware and software complexity, leading to greater security, better reliability, and lower development costs. However, opaque abstractions are often show-stoppers for systems programmers, forcing them to either break the abstraction, ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The power of high-level languages lies in their abstraction over hardware and software complexity, leading to greater security, better reliability, and lower development costs. However, opaque abstractions are often show-stoppers for systems programmers, forcing them to either break the abstraction, or more often, simply give up and use a different language. This paper addresses the challenge of opening up a high-level language to allow practical low-level programming without forsaking integrity or performance.
The contribution of this paper is three-fold: 1) we draw together common threads in a diverse literature, 2) we identify a framework for extending high-level languages for low-level programming, and 3) we show the power of this approach through concrete case studies. Our framework leverages just three core ideas: extending semantics via intrinsic methods, extending types via unboxing and architectural-width primitives, and controlling semantics via scoped semantic regimes. We develop these ideas through the context of a rich literature and substantial practical experience. We show that they provide the power necessary to implement substantial artifacts such as a high-performance virtual machine, while preserving the software engineering benefits of the host language.
The time has come for high-level low-level programming to be taken more seriously: 1) more projects now use high-level languages for systems programming, 2) increasing architectural heterogeneity and parallelism heighten the need for abstraction, and 3) a new generation of high-level languages are under development and ripe to be influenced.
The Moxie JVM Experience
"... By January 1998, only two years after the launch of the first Java virtual machine, almost all JVMs in use today had been architected. In the nine years since, technology has advanced enormously, with respect to the underlying hardware, language implementation, and in the application domain. Althoug ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
By January 1998, only two years after the launch of the first Java virtual machine, almost all JVMs in use today had been architected. In the nine years since, technology has advanced enormously, with respect to the underlying hardware, language implementation, and in the application domain. Although JVM technology has moved forward in leaps and bounds, basic design decisions made in the 90’s has anchored JVM implementation. The Moxie project set out to explore the question: ‘How would we design a JVM from scratch knowing what we know today?’ Amid the mass of design questions we faced, the tension between performance and flexibility was pervasive, persistent and problematic. In this experience paper we describe the Moxie project and its lessons, a process which began with consulting experts from industry and academia, and ended with a fully working prototype.
Caches and Object Streams. October 2006.
, 2007
"... or send email to: Technical-DOT-Reports-AT-cs-DOT-anu.edu.au A list of technical reports, including some abstracts and copies of some full reports may be found at: ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
or send email to: Technical-DOT-Reports-AT-cs-DOT-anu.edu.au A list of technical reports, including some abstracts and copies of some full reports may be found at:

