Results 1  10
of
41
Bayesian Analysis of Mixture Models with an Unknown Number of Components  an alternative to reversible jump methods
, 1998
"... Richardson and Green (1997) present a method of performing a Bayesian analysis of data from a finite mixture distribution with an unknown number of components. Their method is a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, which makes use of the "reversible jump" methodology described by Gree ..."
Abstract

Cited by 114 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Richardson and Green (1997) present a method of performing a Bayesian analysis of data from a finite mixture distribution with an unknown number of components. Their method is a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach, which makes use of the "reversible jump" methodology described by Green (1995). We describe an alternative MCMC method which views the parameters of the model as a (marked) point process, extending methods suggested by Ripley (1977) to create a Markov birthdeath process with an appropriate stationary distribution. Our method is easy to implement, even in the case of data in more than one dimension, and we illustrate it on both univariate and bivariate data. Keywords: Bayesian analysis, Birthdeath process, Markov process, MCMC, Mixture model, Model Choice, Reversible Jump, Spatial point process 1 Introduction Finite mixture models are typically used to model data where each observation is assumed to have arisen from one of k groups, each group being suitably modelle...
An exploration of aspects of Bayesian multiple testing
 Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
, 2005
"... There has been increased interest of late in the Bayesian approach to multiple testing (often called the multiple comparisons problem), motivated by the need to analyze DNA microarray data in which it is desired to learn which of potentially several thousand genes are activated by a particular stimu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
There has been increased interest of late in the Bayesian approach to multiple testing (often called the multiple comparisons problem), motivated by the need to analyze DNA microarray data in which it is desired to learn which of potentially several thousand genes are activated by a particular stimulus. We study the issue of prior specification for such multiple tests; computation of key posterior quantities; and useful ways to display these quantities. A decisiontheoretic approach is also considered.
Entropies and rates of convergence for maximum likelihood and Bayes estimation for mixtures of normal densities
 Ann. Statist
, 2001
"... We study the rates of convergence of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and posterior distribution in density estimation problems, where the densities are location or locationscale mixtures of normal distributions with the scale parameter lying between two positive numbers. The true density is ..."
Abstract

Cited by 62 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the rates of convergence of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and posterior distribution in density estimation problems, where the densities are location or locationscale mixtures of normal distributions with the scale parameter lying between two positive numbers. The true density is also assumed to lie in this class with the true mixing distribution either compactly supported or having subGaussian tails. We obtain bounds for Hellinger bracketing entropies for this class, and from these bounds, we deduce the convergence rates of (sieve) MLEs in Hellinger distance. The rate turns out to be �log n � κ / √ n, where κ ≥ 1 is a constant that depends on the type of mixtures and the choice of the sieve. Next, we consider a Dirichlet mixture of normals as a prior on the unknown density. We estimate the prior probability of a certain KullbackLeibler type neighborhood and then invoke a general theorem that computes the posterior convergence rate in terms the growth rate of the Hellinger entropy and the concentration rate of the prior. The posterior distribution is also seen to converge at the rate �log n � κ / √ n in, where κ now depends on the tail behavior of the base measure of the Dirichlet process. 1. Introduction. A
Hypothesis testing and model selection via posterior simulation
 In: Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S., SpiegelHalter, D.J. (Eds.), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman
, 1996
"... ..."
On Fitting Mixture Models
, 1999
"... Consider the problem of fitting a finite Gaussian mixture, with an unknown number of components, to observed data. This paper proposes a new minimum description length (MDL) type criterion, termed MMDL (for mixture MDL), to select the number of components of the model. MMDL is based on the ident ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Consider the problem of fitting a finite Gaussian mixture, with an unknown number of components, to observed data. This paper proposes a new minimum description length (MDL) type criterion, termed MMDL (for mixture MDL), to select the number of components of the model. MMDL is based on the identification of an "equivalent sample size", for each component, which does not coincide with the full sample size. We also introduce an algorithm based on the standard expectationmaximization (EM) approach together with a new agglomerative step, called agglomerative EM (AEM). The experiments here reported have shown that MMDL outperforms existing criteria of comparable computational cost. The good behavior of AEM, namely its good robustness with respect to initialization, is also illustrated experimentally.
Learning hybrid Bayesian networks from data
, 1998
"... We illustrate two different methodologies for learning Hybrid Bayesian networks, that is, Bayesian networks containing both continuous and discrete variables, from data. The two methodologies differ in the way of handling continuous data when learning the Bayesian network structure. The first method ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We illustrate two different methodologies for learning Hybrid Bayesian networks, that is, Bayesian networks containing both continuous and discrete variables, from data. The two methodologies differ in the way of handling continuous data when learning the Bayesian network structure. The first methodology uses discretized data to learn the Bayesian network structure, and the original nondiscretized data for the parameterization of the learned structure. The second methodology uses nondiscretized data both to learn the Bayesian network structure and its parameterization. For the direct handling of continuous data, we propose the use of artificial neural networks as probability estimators, to be used as an integral part of the scoring metric defined to search the space of Bayesian network structures. With both methodologies, we assume the availability of a complete dataset, with no missing values or hidden variables. We report experimental results aimed at comparing the two methodologies. These results provide evidence that learning with discretized data presents advantages both in terms of efficiency and in terms of accuracy of the learned models over the alternative approach of using nondiscretized data.
Bayesian Time Series Classification
 Advances in Neural Processing Systems 14
, 2002
"... This paper proposes an approach to classification of adjacent segments of a time series as being either of K classes. We use a hierarchical model that consists of a feature extraction stage and a generative classifier which is built on top of these features. Such two stage approaches are often us ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
This paper proposes an approach to classification of adjacent segments of a time series as being either of K classes. We use a hierarchical model that consists of a feature extraction stage and a generative classifier which is built on top of these features. Such two stage approaches are often used in signal and image processing. The novel part of our work is that we link these stages probabilistically by using a latent feature space. To use one joint model is a Bayesian requirement, which has the advantage to fuse information according to its certainty.
Supplemet to “Gamma shape mixtures for heavytailed distributions
, 2008
"... ar ..."
(Show Context)