Results 1 - 10
of
14
From subfactors to categories and topology I. Frobenius algebras in and Morita equivalence of tensor categories
- J. Pure Appl. Alg
, 2003
"... We consider certain categorical structures that are implicit in subfactor theory. Making the connection between subfactor theory (at finite index) and category theory explicit sheds light on both subjects. Furthermore, it allows various generalizations of these structures, e.g. to arbitrary ground f ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 39 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider certain categorical structures that are implicit in subfactor theory. Making the connection between subfactor theory (at finite index) and category theory explicit sheds light on both subjects. Furthermore, it allows various generalizations of these structures, e.g. to arbitrary ground fields, and the proof of new results about topological invariants in three dimensions. The central notion is that of a Frobenius algebra in a tensor category A, which reduces to the classical notion if A = F-Vect, where F is a field. An object X ∈ A with two-sided dual X gives rise to a Frobenius algebra in A, and under weak additional conditions we prove a converse: There exists a bicategory E with ObjE = {A, B} such that EndE(A) ⊗ ≃ A and such that there are J, J: B ⇋ A producing the given Frobenius algebra. Many properties (additivity, sphericity, semisimplicity,...) of A carry over to the bicategory E. We define weak monoidal Morita equivalence of tensor categories, denoted A ≈ B, and establish a correspondence between Frobenius algebras in A and tensor categories B ≈ A. While considerably weaker than equivalence of tensor categories, weak monoidal Morita equivalence A ≈ B has remarkable consequences: A and B have equivalent (as braided tensor categories) quantum doubles (‘centers’) and (if A, B are semisimple spherical or ∗-categories) have equal dimensions and give rise the same state sum invariant of closed oriented 3-manifolds as recently defined by Barrett and Westbury. An instructive example is provided by finite dimensional semisimple and cosemisimple Hopf algebras, for which we prove H − mod ≈ ˆH − mod. The present formalism permits a fairly complete analysis of the center of a semisimple spherical category, which is the subject of the companion paper math.CT/0111205. 1
Galois theory for braided tensor categories and the modular closure
- Adv. Math
, 2000
"... Given a braided tensor ∗-category C with conjugate (dual) objects and irreducible unit together with a full symmetric subcategory S we define a crossed product C ⋊ S. This construction yields a tensor ∗-category with conjugates and an irreducible unit. (A ∗-category is a category enriched over VectC ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 26 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Given a braided tensor ∗-category C with conjugate (dual) objects and irreducible unit together with a full symmetric subcategory S we define a crossed product C ⋊ S. This construction yields a tensor ∗-category with conjugates and an irreducible unit. (A ∗-category is a category enriched over VectC with positive ∗-operation.) A Galois correspondence is established between intermediate categories sitting between C and C ⋊S and closed subgroups of the Galois group Gal(C⋊S/C) = AutC(C⋊S) of C, the latter being isomorphic to the compact group associated to S by the duality theorem of Doplicher and Roberts. Denoting by D ⊂ C the full subcategory of degenerate objects, i.e. objects which have trivial monodromy with all objects of C, the braiding of C extends to a braiding of C⋊S iff S ⊂ D. Under this condition C⋊S has no non-trivial degenerate objects iff S = D. If the original category C is rational (i.e. has only finitely many isomorphism classes of irreducible objects) then the same holds for the new one. The category C ≡ C ⋊ D is called the modular closure of C since in the rational case it is modular, i.e. gives rise to a unitary representation of the modular group SL(2, Z). (In passing we prove that every braided tensor ∗-category with conjugates automatically is a ribbon category, i.e. has a twist.) If all simple objects of S have dimension one the structure of the category C ⋊ S can be clarified quite explicitly in terms of group cohomology. 1
From subfactors to categories and topology III. Triangulation invariants of 3-manifolds and Morita equivalence of tensor categories
- In preparation
"... ..."
On Galois extensions of braided tensor categories, mapping class group representations and simple current extensions
- In preparation
"... We show that the author’s notion of Galois extensions of braided tensor categories [22], see also [3], gives rise to braided crossed G-categories, recently introduced for the purposes of 3-manifold topology [31]. The Galois extensions C ⋊ S are studied in detail, and we determine for which g ∈ G non ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 8 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We show that the author’s notion of Galois extensions of braided tensor categories [22], see also [3], gives rise to braided crossed G-categories, recently introduced for the purposes of 3-manifold topology [31]. The Galois extensions C ⋊ S are studied in detail, and we determine for which g ∈ G non-trivial objects of grade g exist in C ⋊ S. 1
Conformal Orbifold Theories and Braided Crossed G-Categories
, 2004
"... The aim of the paper is twofold. First, we show that a quantum field theory A living on the line and having a group G of inner symmetries gives rise to a category G−LocA of twisted representations. This category is a braided crossed G-category in the sense of Turaev [60]. Its degree zero subcategor ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The aim of the paper is twofold. First, we show that a quantum field theory A living on the line and having a group G of inner symmetries gives rise to a category G−LocA of twisted representations. This category is a braided crossed G-category in the sense of Turaev [60]. Its degree zero subcategory is braided and equivalent to the usual representation category Rep A. Combining this with [29], where Rep A was proven to be modular for a nice class of rational conformal models, and with the construction of invariants of G-manifolds in [60], we obtain an equivariant version of the following chain of constructions: Rational CFT ❀ modular category ❀ 3-manifold invariant. Secondly, we study the relation between G−LocA and the braided (in the usual sense) representation category Rep AG of the orbifold theory AG. We prove the equivalence Rep AG ≃ (G−LocA) G, which is a rigorous implementation of the insight that one needs to take the twisted representations of A into account in order to determine Rep AG. In the opposite direction we have G−LocA ≃ Rep AG ⋊ S, where S ⊂ Rep AG is the full
The Godbillon-Vey class, invariants of manifolds and linearised M-Theory
"... izois @ maths.ox.ac.uk and izois @ cc.uoa.gr; Research supported by the EU, ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
izois @ maths.ox.ac.uk and izois @ cc.uoa.gr; Research supported by the EU,
INVARIANTS OF 3-MANIFOLDS FROM REPRESENTATIONS OF THE FRAMED-TANGLE CATEGORY
, 2002
"... We will construct a monoidal functor (”a monoidal representation”) from the category of framed tangles into the tensor category over a fixed ground vector space which is invariant under Kirby moves and so gives rise to an invariant of 3-manifolds. 1 ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
We will construct a monoidal functor (”a monoidal representation”) from the category of framed tangles into the tensor category over a fixed ground vector space which is invariant under Kirby moves and so gives rise to an invariant of 3-manifolds. 1
unknown title
"... arXiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from AGT published version Unoriented topological quantum field theory and link homology ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
arXiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from AGT published version Unoriented topological quantum field theory and link homology

