Results 1 -
3 of
3
Higher dimensional algebra III: n-categories and the algebra of opetopes. Preprint q-alg
"... We give a definition of weak n-categories based on the theory of operads. We work with operads having an arbitrary set S of types, or ‘S-operads’, and given such an operad O, we denote its set of operations by elt(O). Then for any S-operad O there is an elt(O)-operad O + whose algebras are S-operads ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 70 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We give a definition of weak n-categories based on the theory of operads. We work with operads having an arbitrary set S of types, or ‘S-operads’, and given such an operad O, we denote its set of operations by elt(O). Then for any S-operad O there is an elt(O)-operad O + whose algebras are S-operads over O. Letting I be the initial operad with a one-element set of types, and defining I 0+ = I, I (i+1)+ = (I i+) +, we call the operations of I (n−1)+ the ‘n-dimensional opetopes’. Opetopes form a category, and presheaves on this category are called ‘opetopic sets’. A weak n-category is defined as an opetopic set with certain properties, in a manner reminiscent of Street’s simplicial approach to weak ω-categories. In a similar manner, starting from an arbitrary operad O instead of I, we define ‘n-coherent O-algebras’, which are n times categorified analogs of algebras of O. Examples include ‘monoidal n-categories’, ‘stable n-categories’, ‘virtual n-functors ’ and ‘representable n-prestacks’. We also describe how n-coherent O-algebra objects may be defined in any (n + 1)-coherent O-algebra. 1
An introduction to n-categories
- In 7th Conference on Category Theory and Computer Science
, 1997
"... ..."
On comparing definitions of "weak n–category"
, 2001
"... 1. My approach is "foundational". On the one hand, I am motivated by the problem of the foundations of mathematics (an unsolved problem as far as I am concerned). On the other hand-- and this is more relevant here--, I start "from scratch", and thus what I say can be understood with little technical ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
1. My approach is "foundational". On the one hand, I am motivated by the problem of the foundations of mathematics (an unsolved problem as far as I am concerned). On the other hand-- and this is more relevant here--, I start "from scratch", and thus what I say can be understood with little technical knowledge. I only assume a modest amount of category theory as background. I will talk informally about technical matters that are written down formally elsewhere, where they can be studied further. [The text in square brackets [-] is either some technical explanation, or a digression.] 2. Terminology First, some terminological conventions. I will use the word "category " in its most general sense: weak ω-category. This is completely inclusive: all sorts of "categories " are categories ow. here are two extensions of the original meaning: "weak", and "omega-dimensional". Weak " signifies an indeterminate notion; there are several different specific versions of weak ategory. It can also be used as a vague notion, when one is merely looking at what one would

