Results 1 - 10
of
23
Relativizing Chaitin’s halting probability
- J. Math. Log
"... Abstract. As a natural example of a 1-random real, Chaitin proposed the halting probability Ω of a universal prefix-free machine. We can relativize this example by considering a universal prefix-free oracle machine U. Let Ω A U be the halting probability of U A; this gives a natural uniform way of p ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 20 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. As a natural example of a 1-random real, Chaitin proposed the halting probability Ω of a universal prefix-free machine. We can relativize this example by considering a universal prefix-free oracle machine U. Let Ω A U be the halting probability of U A; this gives a natural uniform way of producing an A-random real for every A ∈ 2 ω. It is this operator which is our primary object of study. We can draw an analogy between the jump operator from computability theory and this Omega operator. But unlike the jump, which is invariant (up to computable permutation) under the choice of an effective enumeration of the partial computable functions, Ω A U can be vastly different for different choices of U. Even for a fixed U, there are oracles A = ∗ B such that Ω A U and Ω B U are 1-random relative to each other. We prove this and many other interesting properties of Omega operators. We investigate these operators from the perspective of analysis, computability theory, and of course, algorithmic randomness. 1.
Benign cost functions and lowness properties
"... Abstract. We show that the class of strongly jump-traceable c.e. sets can be characterised as those which have sufficiently slow enumerations so they obey a class of well-behaved cost function, called benign. This characterisation implies the containment of the class of strongly jump-traceable c.e. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 11 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show that the class of strongly jump-traceable c.e. sets can be characterised as those which have sufficiently slow enumerations so they obey a class of well-behaved cost function, called benign. This characterisation implies the containment of the class of strongly jump-traceable c.e. Turing degrees in a number of lowness classes, in particular the classes of the degrees which lie below incomplete random degrees, indeed all LR-hard random degrees, and all ω-c.e. random degrees. The last result implies recent results of Diamondstone’s and Ng’s regarding cupping with supwerlow c.e. degrees and thus gives a use of algorithmic randomness in the study of the c.e. Turing degrees. 1.
Almost everywhere domination and superhighness
- MATHEMATICAL LOGIC QUARTERLY
, 2007
"... Let ω denote the set of natural numbers. For functions f,g: ω → ω, we say that f is dominated by g if f(n)
Abstract
-
Cited by 11 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Let ω denote the set of natural numbers. For functions f,g: ω → ω, we say that f is dominated by g if f(n) <g(n) for all but finitely many n ∈ ω. We consider the standard “fair coin ” probability measure on the space 2 ω of infinite sequences of 0’s and 1’s. A Turing oracle B is said to be almost everywhere dominating if, for measure one many X ∈ 2 ω, each function which is Turing computable from X is dominated by some function which is Turing computable from B. Dobrinen and Simpson have shown that the almost everywhere domination property and some of its variant properties are closely related to the reverse mathematics of measure theory. In this paper we exposit some recent results of Kjos-Hanssen, Kjos-Hanssen/Miller/Solomon, and others concerning LR-reducibility and almost everywhere domination. We also prove the following new result: If B is almost everywhere dominating, then B is superhigh, i.e., 0 ′ ′ is truth-table computable from B ′ , the Turing jump of B.
Mass problems and almost everywhere domination
- Mathematical Logic Quarterly
"... Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 53, 2007, pp. 483–492. We examine the concept of almost everywhere domination from the viewpoint of mass problems. Let AED and MLR be the set of reals which are almost everywhere dominating and Martin-Löf random, respectively. Let b1, b2, b3 be the degrees of unsolvabil ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 11 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 53, 2007, pp. 483–492. We examine the concept of almost everywhere domination from the viewpoint of mass problems. Let AED and MLR be the set of reals which are almost everywhere dominating and Martin-Löf random, respectively. Let b1, b2, b3 be the degrees of unsolvability of the mass problems associated with the sets AED, MLR×AED, MLR∩AED respectively. Let Pw be the lattice of degrees of unsolvability of mass problems associated with nonempty Π 0 1 subsets of 2 ω.Let1 and 0 be the top and bottom elements of Pw. We show that inf(b1, 1) andinf(b2, 1) andinf(b3, 1) belongtoPw and that 0 < inf(b1, 1) < inf(b2, 1) < inf(b3, 1) < 1. Under the natural embedding of the recursively enumerable Turing degrees into Pw, weshow that inf(b1, 1) andinf(b3, 1) but not inf(b2, 1) are comparable with some recursively enumerable Turing degrees other than 0 and 0 ′. In order to make this paper more self-contained, we exposit the proofs of some recent
Randomness in effective descriptive set theory
- London. Math. Soc
"... Abstract. An analog of ML-randomness in the effective descriptive set theory setting is studied, where the r.e. objects are replaced by their Π1 1 counterparts. We prove the analogs of the Kraft-Chaitin Theorem and Schnorr’s Theorem. In the new setting, while K-trivial sets exist that are not hyper- ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 7 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. An analog of ML-randomness in the effective descriptive set theory setting is studied, where the r.e. objects are replaced by their Π1 1 counterparts. We prove the analogs of the Kraft-Chaitin Theorem and Schnorr’s Theorem. In the new setting, while K-trivial sets exist that are not hyper-arithmetical, each low for random set is. Finally we study a very strong yet effective randomness notion: Z is strongly random if Z is in no null Π1 1 set of reals. We show that there is a greatest Π1 1 null set, that is, a universal test for this notion. 1.
CALCULUS OF COST FUNCTIONS
"... Abstract. We study algebraic properties of cost functions. We give an application: building sets close to being Turing complete. 1. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We study algebraic properties of cost functions. We give an application: building sets close to being Turing complete. 1.
Eliminating concepts
- Proceedings of the IMS workshop on computational prospects of infinity
, 2008
"... Four classes of sets have been introduced independently by various researchers: low for K, low for ML-randomness, basis for ML-randomness and K-trivial. They are all equal. This survey serves as an introduction to these coincidence results, obtained in [24] and [10]. The focus is on providing backdo ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Four classes of sets have been introduced independently by various researchers: low for K, low for ML-randomness, basis for ML-randomness and K-trivial. They are all equal. This survey serves as an introduction to these coincidence results, obtained in [24] and [10]. The focus is on providing backdoor access to the proofs. 1. Outline of the results All sets will be subsets of N unless otherwise stated. K(x) denotes the prefix free complexity of a string x. A set A is K-trivial if, within a constant, each initial segment of A has minimal prefix free complexity. That is, there is c ∈ N such that ∀n K(A ↾ n) ≤ K(0 n) + c. This class was introduced by Chaitin [5] and further studied by Solovay (unpublished). Note that the particular effective epresentation of a number n by a string (unary here) is irrelevant, since up to a constant K(n) is independent from the representation. A is low for Martin-Löf randomness if each Martin-Löf random set is already Martin-Löf random relative to A. This class was defined in Zambella [28], and studied by Kučera and Terwijn [17]. In this survey we will see that the two classes are equivalent [24]. Further concepts have been introduced: to be a basis for ML-randomness (Kučera [16]), and to be low for K (Muchnik jr, in a seminar at Moscow State, 1999). They will also be eliminated, by showing equivalence with K-triviality. All
Beyond strong jump traceability
"... Abstract. Strong jump traceability has been studied by various authors. In this paper we study a variant of strong jump traceability by looking at a partial relativization of traceability. We discover a new subclass H of the c.e. K-trivials with some interesting properties. These sets are computatio ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Strong jump traceability has been studied by various authors. In this paper we study a variant of strong jump traceability by looking at a partial relativization of traceability. We discover a new subclass H of the c.e. K-trivials with some interesting properties. These sets are computationally very weak, but yet contains a cuppable member. Surprisingly they cannot be constructed using cost functions, and is the first known example of a subclass of the K-trivials which does not contain any promptly simple member. Furthermore there is a single c.e. set which caps every member of H, demonstrating that they are in fact very far away from being promptly simple. 1.
Turing Incomparability in Scott Sets
- Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
"... Abstract. For every Scott set F and every nonrecursive set X in F, there is a Y ∈ F such that X and Y are Turing incomparable. 1. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 3 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. For every Scott set F and every nonrecursive set X in F, there is a Y ∈ F such that X and Y are Turing incomparable. 1.
Superhighness and strong jump traceability
"... Abstract. Let A be a c.e. set. Then A is strongly jump traceable if and only if A is Turing below each superhigh Martin-Löf random set. The proof combines priority with measure theoretic arguments. 1 ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Let A be a c.e. set. Then A is strongly jump traceable if and only if A is Turing below each superhigh Martin-Löf random set. The proof combines priority with measure theoretic arguments. 1

