Since the early days of logic programming, researchers in the field realized the potential for exploitation of parallelism present in the execution of logic programs. Their high-level nature, the presence of non-determinism, and their referential transparency, among other characteristics, make logic programs interesting candidates for obtaining speedups through parallel execution. At the same time, the fact that the typical applications of logic programming frequently involve irregular computations, make heavy use of dynamic data structures with logical variables, and involve search and speculation, makes the techniques used in the corresponding parallelizing compilers and run-time systems potentially interesting even outside the field. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive survey of the issues arising in parallel execution of logic programming languages along with the most relevant approaches explored to date in the field. Focus is mostly given to the challenges emerging from the parallel execution of Prolog programs. The paper describes the major techniques used for shared memory implementation of Or-parallelism, And-parallelism, and combinations of the two. We also explore some related issues, such as memory

Abstract not found

Abstract not found

The availability of commodity multi-core and multi-processor machines and the inherent parallelism in constraint programming search offer significant opportunities for constraint programming. They also present a fundamental challenge: how to exploit parallelism transparently to speed up constraint programs. This paper shows how to parallelize constraint programs transparently without changes to the code. The main technical idea consists of automatically lifting a sequential exploration strategy into its parallel counterpart, allowing workers to share and steal subproblems. Experimental results show that the parallel implementation may produces significant speedups on multi-core machines. 1

Abstract. As a case study that illustrates our view on coordination and component-based software engineering, we present the design and implementation of a parallel constraint solver. The parallel solver coordinates autonomous instances of a sequential constraint solver, which is used as a software component. The component solvers achieve load balancing of tree search through a time-out mechanism. Experiments show that the purely exogenous mode of coordination employed here yields a viable parallel solver that effectively reduces turn-around time for constraint solving on a broad range of hardware platforms.

Abstract. This paper describes the development of the PALS system, an implementation of Prolog that efficiently exploits or-parallelism on share-nothing platforms. PALS makes use of a novel technique, called incremental stack-splitting. The technique builds on the stack-splitting approach, which in turn is an evolution of the stack-copying method used in a variety of parallel logic systems. This is the first distributed implementation based on the stack-splitting method ever realized. Experimental results obtained on a Beowulf system are presented and analyzed. 1

We present a framework for the parallelization of depthfirst combinatorial search algorithms on a network of computers. Our architecture is intended for a distributed setting and uses a work stealing strategy coupled with a small number of primitives for the processors (which we call workers) to obtain new work and to communicate to other workers. These primitives are a minimal imposition and integrate easily with constraint programming systems. The main contribution is an adaptive architecture which allows workers to incrementally join and leave and has good scaling properties as the number of workers increases. Our empirical results illustrate that near-linear speedup for backtrack search is achieved for up to 61 workers. It suggests that near-linear speedup is possible with even more workers. The experiments also demonstrate where departures from linearity can occur for small problems, and also for problems where the parallelism can itself affect the search as in branch and bound. 1.

Abstract. Distributed computing is increasingly important at a time when the doubling of the number of transistors on a processor every 18 months no longer translates in a doubling of speed but instead a doubling of the number of cores. Unfortunately, it also places significant conceptual and implementation burden on programmers. This paper aims at addressing this challenge for constraint-based local search (CBLS), whose search procedures typically exhibit inherent parallelism stemming from multistart, restart, or population-based techniques whose benefits have been demonstrated both experimentally and theoretically. The paper presents abstractions that allows distributed CBLS programs to be close to their sequential and parallel counterparts, keeping the conceptual and implementation overhead of distributed computing minimal. A preliminary implementation in Comet exhibits significant speed-ups in constraint satisfaction and optimization applications. The implementation also scales well with the number of machines. Of particular interest is the observation that generic abstractions of CBLS and CP, such as models and solutions, and advanced control structures such as events and closures, play a fundamental role to keep the distance between sequential and distributed CBLS programs small. As a result, the abstractions directly apply to CP programs using multistarts or restarts procedures. 1

CWI is a founding member of ERCIM, the European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics. CWI's research has a theme-oriented structure and is grouped into four clusters. Listed below are the names of the clusters and in parentheses their acronyms.

Abstract. Constraint problems can be trivially solved in parallel by exploring different branches of the search tree concurrently. Previous approaches have focused on implementing this functionality in the solver, more or less transparently to the user. We propose a new approach, which modifies the constraint model of the problem. An existing model is split into new models with added constraints that partition the search space. Optionally, additional constraints are imposed that rule out the search already done. The advantages of our approach are that it can be implemented easily, computations can be stopped and restarted, moved to different machines and indeed solved on machines which are not able to communicate with each other at all. 1