Results 1  10
of
31
A type system for certified binaries
 In ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
, 2002
"... A certified binary is a value together with a proof that the value satisfies a given specification. Existing compilers that generate certified code have focused on simple memory and controlflow safety rather than more advanced properties. In this paper, we present a general framework for explicitly ..."
Abstract

Cited by 84 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A certified binary is a value together with a proof that the value satisfies a given specification. Existing compilers that generate certified code have focused on simple memory and controlflow safety rather than more advanced properties. In this paper, we present a general framework for explicitly representing complex propositions and proofs in typed intermediate and assembly languages. The new framework allows us to reason about certified programs that involve effects while still maintaining decidable typechecking. We show how to integrate an entire proof system (the calculus of inductive constructions) into a compiler intermediate language and how the intermediate language can undergo complex transformations (CPS and closure conversion) while preserving proofs represented in the type system. Our work provides a foundation for the process of automatically generating certified binaries in a typetheoretic framework. 1
Program extraction from normalization proofs
 Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, number 664 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 1993
"... This paper describes formalizations of Tait’s normalization proof for the simply typed λcalculus in the proof assistants Minlog, Coq and Isabelle/HOL. From the formal proofs programs are machineextracted that implement variants of the wellknown normalizationbyevaluation algorithm. The case stud ..."
Abstract

Cited by 61 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper describes formalizations of Tait’s normalization proof for the simply typed λcalculus in the proof assistants Minlog, Coq and Isabelle/HOL. From the formal proofs programs are machineextracted that implement variants of the wellknown normalizationbyevaluation algorithm. The case study is used to test and compare the program extraction machineries of the three proof assistants in a nontrivial setting. 1
Inductively Defined Types in the Calculus of Constructions
 IN: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH CONFERENCE ON THE MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF PROGRAMMING SEMANTICS. SPRINGER VERLAG LNCS
, 1989
"... We define the notion of an inductively defined type in the Calculus of Constructions and show how inductively defined types can be represented by closed types. We show that all primitive recursive functionals over these inductively defined types are also representable. This generalizes work by Böhm ..."
Abstract

Cited by 43 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We define the notion of an inductively defined type in the Calculus of Constructions and show how inductively defined types can be represented by closed types. We show that all primitive recursive functionals over these inductively defined types are also representable. This generalizes work by Böhm & Berarducci on synthesis of functions on term algebras in the secondorder polymorphiccalculus (F2). We give several applications of this generalization, including a representation of F2programs in F3, along with a definition of functions reify, reflect, and eval for F2 in F3. We also show how to define induction over inductively defined types and sketch some results that show that the extension of the Calculus of Construction by induction principles does not alter the set of functions in its computational fragment, F!. This is because a proof by induction can be realized by primitive recursion, which is already de nable in F!.
Observational Equality, Now!
 A SUBMISSION TO PLPV 2007
, 2007
"... This paper has something new and positive to say about propositional equality in programming and proof systems based on the CurryHoward correspondence between propositions and types. We have found a way to present a propositional equality type • which is substitutive, allowing us to reason by repla ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper has something new and positive to say about propositional equality in programming and proof systems based on the CurryHoward correspondence between propositions and types. We have found a way to present a propositional equality type • which is substitutive, allowing us to reason by replacing equal for equal in propositions; • which reflects the observable behaviour of values rather than their construction: in particular, we have extensionality— functions are equal if they take equal inputs to equal outputs; • which retains strong normalisation, decidable typechecking and canonicity—the property that closed normal forms inhabiting datatypes have canonical constructors; • which allows inductive data structures to be expressed in terms of a standard characterisation of wellfounded trees; • which is presented syntactically—you can implement it directly, and we are doing so—this approach stands at the core of Epigram 2; • which you can play with now: we have simulated our system by a shallow embedding in Agda 2, shipping as part of the standard examples package for that system [20]. Until now, it has always been necessary to sacrifice some of these aspects. The closest attempt in the literature is Altenkirch’s construction of a setoidmodel for a system with canonicity and extensionality on top of an intensional type theory with proofirrelevant propositions [4]. Our new proposal simplifies Altenkirch’s construction by adopting McBride’s heterogeneous approach to equality [18].
QArith: Coq formalisation of lazy rational arithmetic
 Types for Proofs and Programs, volume 3085 of LNCS
, 2003
"... Abstract. In this paper we present the Coq formalisation of the QArith library which is an implementation of rational numbers as binary sequences for both lazy and strict computation. We use the representation also known as the SternBrocot representation for rational numbers. This formalisation use ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper we present the Coq formalisation of the QArith library which is an implementation of rational numbers as binary sequences for both lazy and strict computation. We use the representation also known as the SternBrocot representation for rational numbers. This formalisation uses advanced machinery of the Coq theorem prover and applies recent developments in formalising general recursive functions. This formalisation highlights the rôle of type theory both as a tool to verify handwritten programs and as a tool to generate verified programs. 1
Program Extraction in simplytyped Higher Order Logic
 Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2002), LNCS 2646
, 2002
"... Based on a representation of primitive proof objects as  terms, which has been built into the theorem prover Isabelle recently, we propose a generic framework for program extraction. We show how this framework can be used to extract functional programs from proofs conducted in a constructive fr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Based on a representation of primitive proof objects as  terms, which has been built into the theorem prover Isabelle recently, we propose a generic framework for program extraction. We show how this framework can be used to extract functional programs from proofs conducted in a constructive fragment of the object logic Isabelle/HOL. A characteristic feature of our implementation of program extraction is that it produces both a program and a correctness proof. Since the extracted program is available as a function within the logic, its correctness proof can be checked automatically inside Isabelle.
Formal mathematics for verifiably correct program synthesis
 JOURNAL OF THE IGPL
, 1996
"... We describe a formalization of the metamathematics of programming in a higherorder logical calculus as a means to create verifiably correct implementations of program synthesis tools. Using reflected notions of programming concepts we can specify the actions of synthesis methods within the object ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a formalization of the metamathematics of programming in a higherorder logical calculus as a means to create verifiably correct implementations of program synthesis tools. Using reflected notions of programming concepts we can specify the actions of synthesis methods within the object language of the calculus and prove formal theorems about their behavior. The theorems serve as derived inference rules implementing the kernel of these methods in a flexible, safe, efficient and comprehensible way. We demonstrate the advantages of using formal mathematics in support of program development systems through an example in which we formalize a strategy for deriving global search algorithms from formal specifications.
Comparing cubes of typed and type assignment systems
 Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 1997
"... We study the cube of type assignment systems, as introduced in [13], and confront it with Barendregt’s typed λcube [4]. The first is obtained from the latter through applying a natural type erasing function E to derivation rules, that erases type information from terms. In particular, we address th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the cube of type assignment systems, as introduced in [13], and confront it with Barendregt’s typed λcube [4]. The first is obtained from the latter through applying a natural type erasing function E to derivation rules, that erases type information from terms. In particular, we address the question whether a judgement, derivable in a type assignment system, is always an erasure of a derivable judgement in a corresponding typed system; we show that this property holds only for the systems without polymorphism. The type assignment systems we consider satisfy the properties ‘subject reduction’ and ‘strong normalization’. Moreover, we define a new type assignment cube that is isomorphic to the typed one.
A constructive and formal proof of Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence Theorem in the interactive theorem prover Matita
, 2008
"... We present a formalisation of a constructive proof of Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem given by Sacerdoti Coen and Zoli in [SZ]. The proof is done in the abstract setting of ordered uniformities, also introduced by the two authors as a simplification of Weber’s lattice uniformities given in ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a formalisation of a constructive proof of Lebesgue’s Dominated Convergence Theorem given by Sacerdoti Coen and Zoli in [SZ]. The proof is done in the abstract setting of ordered uniformities, also introduced by the two authors as a simplification of Weber’s lattice uniformities given in [Web91, Web93]. The proof is fully constructive, in the sense that it is done in Bishop’s style and, under certain assumptions, it is also fully predicative. The formalisation is done in the Calculus of (Co)Inductive Constructions using the interactive theorem prover Matita [ASTZ07]. It exploits some peculiar features of Matita and an advanced technique to represent algebraic hierarchies previously introduced by the authors in [ST07]. Moreover, we introduce a new technique to cope with duality to halve the formalisation effort.
Realizability and parametricity in pure type systems
 In the Proceedings of FoSSaCS 2011 (Saarbruecken
, 2011
"... Abstract. We describe a systematic method to build a logic from any programming language described as a Pure Type System (PTS). The formulas of this logic express properties about programs. We define a parametricity theory about programs and a realizability theory for the logic. The logic is express ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We describe a systematic method to build a logic from any programming language described as a Pure Type System (PTS). The formulas of this logic express properties about programs. We define a parametricity theory about programs and a realizability theory for the logic. The logic is expressive enough to internalize both theories. Thanks to the PTS setting, we abstract most idiosyncrasies specific to particular type theories. This confers generality to the results, and reveals parallels between parametricity and realizability. 1