• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Markov chain Monte Carlo model determination for hierarchical and graphical log-linear models (1999)

by P Dellaportas, J Forster
Venue:Biometrika
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 35
Next 10 →

Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and Learning

by Kevin Patrick Murphy , 2002
"... Modelling sequential data is important in many areas of science and engineering. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Kalman filter models (KFMs) are popular for this because they are simple and flexible. For example, HMMs have been used for speech recognition and bio-sequence analysis, and KFMs have bee ..."
Abstract - Cited by 393 (4 self) - Add to MetaCart
Modelling sequential data is important in many areas of science and engineering. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Kalman filter models (KFMs) are popular for this because they are simple and flexible. For example, HMMs have been used for speech recognition and bio-sequence analysis, and KFMs have been used for problems ranging from tracking planes and missiles to predicting the economy. However, HMMs and KFMs are limited in their “expressive power”. Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) generalize HMMs by allowing the state space to be represented in factored form, instead of as a single discrete random variable. DBNs generalize KFMs by allowing arbitrary probability distributions, not just (unimodal) linear-Gaussian. In this thesis, I will discuss how to represent many different kinds of models as DBNs, how to perform exact and approximate inference in DBNs, and how to learn DBN models from sequential data. In particular, the main novel technical contributions of this thesis are as follows: a way of representing Hierarchical HMMs as DBNs, which enables inference to be done in O(T) time instead of O(T 3), where T is the length of the sequence; an exact smoothing algorithm that takes O(log T) space instead of O(T); a simple way of using the junction tree algorithm for online inference in DBNs; new complexity bounds on exact online inference in DBNs; a new deterministic approximate inference algorithm called factored frontier; an analysis of the relationship between the BK algorithm and loopy belief propagation; a way of applying Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering to DBNs in general, and the SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) problem in particular; a way of extending the structural EM algorithm to DBNs; and a variety of different applications of DBNs. However, perhaps the main value of the thesis is its catholic presentation of the field of sequential data modelling.

Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial

by Jennifer A. Hoeting , David Madigan, Adrian E. Raftery, Chris T. Volinsky - STATISTICAL SCIENCE , 1999
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 83 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Decomposable Graphical Gaussian Model Determination

by Paolo Giudici, Peter J. Green , 1999
"... We propose a methodology for Bayesian model determination in decomposable graphical gaussian models. To achieve this aim we consider a hyper inverse Wishart prior distribution on the concentration matrix for each given graph. To ensure compatibility across models, such prior distributions are obt ..."
Abstract - Cited by 54 (9 self) - Add to MetaCart
We propose a methodology for Bayesian model determination in decomposable graphical gaussian models. To achieve this aim we consider a hyper inverse Wishart prior distribution on the concentration matrix for each given graph. To ensure compatibility across models, such prior distributions are obtained by marginalisation from the prior conditional on the complete graph. We explore alternative structures for the hyperparameters of the latter, and their consequences for the model. Model determination is carried out by implementing a reversible jump MCMC sampler. In particular, the dimension-changing move we propose involves adding or dropping an edge from the graph. We characterise the set of moves which preserve the decomposability of the graph, giving a fast algorithm for maintaining the junction tree representation of the graph at each sweep. As state variable, we propose to use the incomplete variance-covariance matrix, containing only the elements for which the correspondi...

The practical implementation of Bayesian model selection

by Hugh Chipman, Edward I. George, Robert E. Mcculloch - Institute of Mathematical Statistics , 2001
"... In principle, the Bayesian approach to model selection is straightforward. Prior probability distributions are used to describe the uncertainty surrounding all unknowns. After observing the data, the posterior distribution provides a coherent post data summary of the remaining uncertainty which is r ..."
Abstract - Cited by 48 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
In principle, the Bayesian approach to model selection is straightforward. Prior probability distributions are used to describe the uncertainty surrounding all unknowns. After observing the data, the posterior distribution provides a coherent post data summary of the remaining uncertainty which is relevant for model selection. However, the practical implementation of this approach often requires carefully tailored priors and novel posterior calculation methods. In this article, we illustrate some of the fundamental practical issues that arise for two different model selection problems: the variable selection problem for the linear model and the CART model selection problem.

Experiments in Stochastic Computation for High-Dimensional Graphical Models

by Beatrix Jones, Carlos Carvalho, Adrian Dobra, Chris Hans, Chris Carter, Mike West , 2004
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 46 (19 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

On Bayesian Model and Variable Selection Using MCMC

by Petros Dellaportas, Jonathan J. Forster, Ioannis Ntzoufras , 1997
"... Introduction A Bayesian approach to model selection proceeds as follows. Suppose that the data y are considered to have been generated by a model m, one of a set M of competing models. Each model specifies the distribution of Y , f(yjm; fi m ) apart from an unknown parameter vector fi m 2 Bm , wh ..."
Abstract - Cited by 34 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Introduction A Bayesian approach to model selection proceeds as follows. Suppose that the data y are considered to have been generated by a model m, one of a set M of competing models. Each model specifies the distribution of Y , f(yjm; fi m ) apart from an unknown parameter vector fi m 2 Bm , where Bm is the set of all possible values for the coefficients of model m. If f(m) is the prior probability of model m, then the posterior probability is given by f(mjy) = f(m)f(y jm) P m2M f(m)f(y jm)

Tractable Bayesian Learning of Tree Belief Networks

by Marina Meila, Tommi Jaakkola , 2000
"... In this paper we present decomposable priors, a family of priors over structure and parameters of tree belief nets for which Bayesian learning with complete observations is tractable, in the sense that the posterior is also decomposable and can be completely determined analytically in polynomial tim ..."
Abstract - Cited by 33 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper we present decomposable priors, a family of priors over structure and parameters of tree belief nets for which Bayesian learning with complete observations is tractable, in the sense that the posterior is also decomposable and can be completely determined analytically in polynomial time. This follows from two main results: First, we show that factored distributions over spanning trees in a graph can be integrated in closed form. Second, we examine priors over tree parameters and show that a set of assumptions similar to (Heckerman and al., 1995) constrain the tree parameter priors to be a compactly parametrized product of Dirichlet distributions. Besides allowing for exact Bayesian learning, these results permit us to formulate a new class of tractable latent variable models in which the likelihood of a data point is computed through an ensemble average over tree structures. 1 Introduction In the framework of graphical models, tree distributions stand out by their spec...

Bayesian Learning in Undirected Graphical Models: Approximate MCMC algorithms

by Iain Murray, Zoubin Ghahramani , 2004
"... Bayesian learning in undirected graphical models --- computing posterior distributions over parameters and predictive quantities --- is exceptionally difficult. We conjecture that for general undirected models, there are no tractable MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) schemes giving the correct equilib ..."
Abstract - Cited by 27 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Bayesian learning in undirected graphical models --- computing posterior distributions over parameters and predictive quantities --- is exceptionally difficult. We conjecture that for general undirected models, there are no tractable MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) schemes giving the correct equilibrium distribution over parameters. While this intractability, due to the partition function, is familiar to those performing parameter optimisation, Bayesian learning of posterior distributions over undirected model parameters has been unexplored and poses novel challenges. We propose several approximate MCMC schemes and test on fully observed binary models (Boltzmann machines) for a small coronary heart disease data set and larger artificial systems. While approximations must perform well on the model, their interaction with the sampling scheme is also important. Samplers based on variational mean-field approximations generally performed poorly, more advanced methods using loopy propagation, brief sampling and stochastic dynamics lead to acceptable parameter posteriors. Finally, we demonstrate these techniques on a Markov random field with hidden variables.

Model uncertainty

by Merlise Clyde, Edward I. George - STATIST. SCI , 2004
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 13 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Efficient Model Determination for Discrete Graphical Models

by Paolo Giudici, Peter Green, Claudia Tarantola , 2000
"... We present a novel methodology for bayesian model determination in discrete decomposable graphical models. We assign, for each given graph, a Hyper Dirichlet distribution on the matrix of cell probabilities. To ensure compatibility across models such prior distributions are obtained by marginalis ..."
Abstract - Cited by 10 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
We present a novel methodology for bayesian model determination in discrete decomposable graphical models. We assign, for each given graph, a Hyper Dirichlet distribution on the matrix of cell probabilities. To ensure compatibility across models such prior distributions are obtained by marginalisation from the prior conditional on the complete graph. This leads to a prior distribution automatically satisfying the hyperconsistency criterion. Our contribution is twofold. On one hand we improve an existing methodology, the MC 3 algorithm by Madigan and York (1995). On the other hand we introduce an original methodology based on the use of the Reversible jump sampler by Green (1995) and Giudici and Green (1999). Legal movement, that is leading to a decomposable graph, are identied making use of the junction tree representation of the considered graph. Keywords: Bayesian model selection; Contingency table; Dirichlet distribution; Hyper Markov distribution; Junction tree; Marko...
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University