Results 1  10
of
22
Fixed Parameter Algorithms for Dominating Set and Related Problems on Planar Graphs
, 2002
"... We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the kdominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c . To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number (G) is O( (G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O( (G)n) time. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 118 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the kdominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c . To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number (G) is O( (G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O( (G)n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the kface cover problem ( find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved in O(c n) time, where c 1 = 3 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of kdominating set, e.g., kindependent dominating set and kweighted dominating set.
Parameterized complexity: exponential speedup for planar graph problems
 In Proc. 15th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming ICALP
, 2001
"... All intext references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (20 self)
 Add to MetaCart
All intext references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Algorithms For Vertex Partitioning Problems On Partial kTrees
, 1997
"... In this paper, we consider a large class of vertex partitioning problems and apply to those the theory of algorithm design for problems restricted to partial ktrees. We carefully describe the details of algorithms and analyze their complexity in an attempt to make the algorithms feasible as solutio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 56 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we consider a large class of vertex partitioning problems and apply to those the theory of algorithm design for problems restricted to partial ktrees. We carefully describe the details of algorithms and analyze their complexity in an attempt to make the algorithms feasible as solutions for practical applications.
Fixed parameter algorithms for planar dominating set and related problems
, 2000
"... We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the kdominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c √ kn), where c = 36√34. To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ(G) is O ( � γ(G)), and that such a tree decomposition ca ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We present an algorithm that constructively produces a solution to the kdominating set problem for planar graphs in time O(c √ kn), where c = 36√34. To obtain this result, we show that the treewidth of a planar graph with domination number γ(G) is O ( � γ(G)), and that such a tree decomposition can be found in O ( � γ(G)n) time. The same technique can be used to show that the kface cover problem (find a size k set of faces that cover all vertices of a given plane graph) can be solved √ k in O(c1 n + n2) time, where c1 = 236√34 and k is the size of the face cover set. Similar results can be obtained in the planar case for some variants of kdominating set, e.g., kindependent dominating set and kweighted dominating set. Keywords. NPcomplete problems, fixed parameter tractability, planar graphs, planar dominating set, face cover, outerplanarity, treewidth.
Improved Tree Decomposition Based Algorithms for Dominationlike Problems
 in LATIN’02: Theoretical informatics (Cancun
, 2001
"... We present an improved dynamic programming strategy for dominating set and related problems on graphs that are given together with a tree decomposition of width k. We obtain an O(4 n) algorithm for dominating set, where n is the number of nodes of the tree decomposition. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present an improved dynamic programming strategy for dominating set and related problems on graphs that are given together with a tree decomposition of width k. We obtain an O(4 n) algorithm for dominating set, where n is the number of nodes of the tree decomposition.
Complexity of dominationtype problems in graphs
 NORDIC JOURNAL OF COMPUTING
, 1994
"... Many graph parameters are the optimal value of an objective function over selected subsets S of vertices with some constraint on how many selected neighbors vertices in S, and vertices not in S, can have. Classic examples are minimum dominating set and maximum independent set. We give a characteriza ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many graph parameters are the optimal value of an objective function over selected subsets S of vertices with some constraint on how many selected neighbors vertices in S, and vertices not in S, can have. Classic examples are minimum dominating set and maximum independent set. We give a characterization of these graph parameters that unifies their definitions, facilitates their common algorithmic treatment and allows for their uniform complexity classification. This characterization provides the basis for a taxonomy of dominationtype and independencetype problems. We investigate the computational complexity of problems within this taxonomy, identify classes of NPcomplete problems and classes of problems solvable in polynomial time. CR Classification: F.2.2, G.2.2
Graph separators: a parameterized view
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 2001
"... Graph separation is a wellknown tool to make (hard) graph problems accessible to a divide and conquer approach. We show how to use graph separator theorems in combination with (linear) problem kernels in order to develop xed parameter algorithms for many wellknown NPhard (planar) graph problems. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Graph separation is a wellknown tool to make (hard) graph problems accessible to a divide and conquer approach. We show how to use graph separator theorems in combination with (linear) problem kernels in order to develop xed parameter algorithms for many wellknown NPhard (planar) graph problems. We coin the key notion of glueable select&verify graph problems and derive from that a prospective way to easily check whether a planar graph problem will allow for a xed parameter algorithm of running time c p
A Structural View on Parameterizing Problems: Distance from Triviality
 In First International Workshop on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IWPEC 2004, LNCS Proceedings
, 2004
"... Based on a series of known and new examples, we propose the generalized setting of "distance from triviality" measurement as a reasonable and prospective way of determining useful structural problem parameters in analyzing computationally hard problems. The underlying idea is to consid ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Based on a series of known and new examples, we propose the generalized setting of "distance from triviality" measurement as a reasonable and prospective way of determining useful structural problem parameters in analyzing computationally hard problems. The underlying idea is to consider tractable special cases of generally hard problems and to introduce parameters that measure the distance from these special cases. In this paper we present several case studies of distance from triviality parameterizations (concerning Clique, Power Dominating Set, Set Cover, and Longest Common Subsequence) that exhibit the versatility of this approach to develop important new views for computational complexity analysis.
Known Algorithms on Graphs of Bounded Treewidth are Probably Optimal
, 2010
"... We obtain a number of lower bounds on the running time of algorithms solving problems on graphs of bounded treewidth. We prove the results under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In particular, assuming that SAT cannot be solved in (2−ǫ) n m O(1) time, we show that fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We obtain a number of lower bounds on the running time of algorithms solving problems on graphs of bounded treewidth. We prove the results under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In particular, assuming that SAT cannot be solved in (2−ǫ) n m O(1) time, we show that for any ǫ> 0; • INDEPENDENT SET cannot be solved in (2 − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time, • DOMINATING SET cannot be solved in (3 − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time, • MAX CUT cannot be solved in (2 − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time, • ODD CYCLE TRANSVERSAL cannot be solved in (3 − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time, • For any q ≥ 3, qCOLORING cannot be solved in (q − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time, • PARTITION INTO TRIANGLES cannot be solved in (2 − ǫ) tw(G) V (G)  O(1) time. Our lower bounds match the running times for the best known algorithms for the problems, up to the ǫ in the base.
Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination
 in graphs, Lecture Notes Comp. Sci. 3623
, 2005
"... Abstract. The Power Dominating Set problem is a variant of the classical domination problem in graphs: Given an undirected graph G = (V, E), find a minimum P ⊆ V such that all vertices in V are “observed” by vertices in P. Herein, a vertex observes itself and all its neighbors, and if an observed ve ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. The Power Dominating Set problem is a variant of the classical domination problem in graphs: Given an undirected graph G = (V, E), find a minimum P ⊆ V such that all vertices in V are “observed” by vertices in P. Herein, a vertex observes itself and all its neighbors, and if an observed vertex has all but one of its neighbors observed, then the remaining neighbor becomes observed as well. We show that Power Dominating Set can be solved by “boundedtreewidth dynamic programs.” Moreover, we simplify and extend several NPcompleteness results, particularly showing that Power Dominating Set remains NPcomplete for planar graphs, for circle graphs, and for split graphs. Specifically, our improved reductions imply that Power Dominating Set parameterized by P  is W[2]hard and cannot be better approximated than Dominating Set. 1