This tutorial covers the canonical genetic algorithm as well as more experimental forms of genetic algorithms, including parallel island models and parallel cellular genetic algorithms. The tutorial also illustrates genetic search byhyperplane sampling. The theoretical foundations of genetic algorithms are reviewed, include the schema theorem as well as recently developed exact models of the canonical genetic algorithm.

Parallel implementations of genetic algorithms (GAs) are common, and, in most cases, they succeed to reduce the time required to find acceptable solutions. However, the effect of the parameters of parallel GAs on the quality of their search and on their efficiency are not well understood. This insufficient knowledge limits our ability to design fast and accurate parallel GAs that reach the desired solutions in the shortest time possible. The goal of this dissertation is to advance the understanding of parallel GAs and to provide rational guidelines for their design. The research reported here considered three major types of parallel GAs: simple master-slave algorithms with one population, more sophisticated algorithms with multiple populations, and a hierarchical combination of the first two types. The investigation formulated simple models that predict accurately the quality of the solutions with different parameter settings. The quality predictors were transformed into population-sizing equations, which in turn were used to estimate the execution time of the algorithms.

Evolutionary computation has started to receive significant attention during the last decade, although the origins can be traced back to the late 1950s. This article surveys the history as well as the current state of this rapidly growing field. We describe the purpose, the general structure and the working principles of different approaches, including genetic algorithms (GA) (with links to genetic programming (GP) and classifier systems (CS)), evolution strategies (ES), and evolutionary programming (EP), by analysis and comparison of their most important constituents (i.e., representations, variation operators, reproduction and selection mechanism). Finally, we give a brief overview on the manifold of application domains, although this necessarily must remain incomplete.

Niching methods extend genetic algorithms to domains that require the location and maintenance of multiple solutions. Such domains include classification and machine learning, multimodal function optimization, multiobjective function optimization, and simulation of complex and adaptive systems. This study presents a comprehensive treatment of niching methods and the related topic of population diversity. Its purpose is to analyze existing niching methods and to design improved niching methods. To achieve this purpose, it first develops a general framework for the modelling of niching methods, and then applies this framework to construct models of individual niching methods, specifically crowding and sharing methods. Using a constructed model of crowding, this study determines why crowding methods over the last two decades have not made effective niching methods. A series of tests and design modifications results in the development of a highly effective form of crowding, called determin...

The availability of massively parallel computers makes it possible to apply genetic algorithms to large populations and very complex applications. Among these applications are studies of natural evolution in the emerging field of artificial life, which place special demands on the genetic algorithm. In this paper, we characterize the difference between panmictic and local selection/mating schemes in terms of diversity of alleles, diversity of genotypes, the inbreeding coefficient, and the speed and robustness of the genetic algorithm. Based on these metrics, local mating appears to not only be superior to panmictic for artificial evolutionary simulations, but also for more traditional applications of genetic algorithms.

Genetic algorithms (GAs) are powerful search techniques that are used successfully to solve problems in many different disciplines. Parallel GAs are particularly easy to implement and promise substantial gains in performance. As such, there has been extensive research in this field. This survey attempts to collect, organize, and present in a unified way some of the most representative publications on parallel genetic algorithms. To organize the literature, the paper presents a categorization of the techniques used to parallelize GAs, and shows examples of all of them. However, since the majority of the research in this field has concentrated on parallel GAs with multiple populations, the survey focuses on this type of algorithms. Also, the paper describes some of the most significant problems in modeling and designing multi-population parallel GAs and presents some recent advancements.

The parallel genetic algorithm (PGA) uses two major modifications compared to the genetic algorithm. Firstly, selection for mating is distributed. Individuals live in a 2-D world. Selection of a mate is done by each individual independently in its neighborhood. Secondly, each individual may improve its fitness during its lifetime by e.g. local hill-climbing. The PGA is totally asynchronous, running with maximal efficiency on MIMD parallel computers. The search strategy of the PGA is based on a small number of active and intelligent individuals, whereas a GA uses a large population of passive individuals. We will investigate the PGA with deceptive problems and the traveling salesman problem. We outline why and when the PGA is succesful. Abstractly, a PGA is a parallel search with information exchange between the individuals. If we represent the optimization problem as a fitness landscape in a certain configuration space, we see, that a PGA tries to jump from two local minima to a third, still better local minima, by using the crossover operator. This jump is (probabilistically) successful, if the fitness landscape has a certain correlation. We show the correlation for the traveling salesman problem by a configuration space analysis. The PGA explores implicitly the above correlation.

Abstract not found

This paper proposes a general framework for the use of coevolution to boost the performance of genetic search. It combines coevolution with yet another biologically inspired technique, called life-time fitness evaluation (LTFE). Two unrelated problems - neural net learning and constraint satisfaction - are used to illustrate the approach. Both problems use predator-prey interactions to boost the search. In contrast with traditional "single population " genetic algorithms (GAs), two populations constantly interact and coevolve. However, the same algorithm can also be used with different types of coevolutionary interactions. As an example, the symbiotic coevolution of solutions and genetic representations is shown to provide an elegant solution to the problem of finding a suitable genetic representation. The approach presented here greatly profits from the partial and continuous nature of LTFE. Noise tolerance is one advantage. Even more important, LTFE is ideally suited to deal with co...

The main goal of this paper is to summarize the previous research on parallel genetic algorithms. We present an extension to previous categorizations of the parallelization techniques used in this field. We will use this categorization to guide us through a review of many of the most important publications. We will build on this survey to try to identify some of the problems that have not been studied systematically yet. 1 Introduction Genetic Algorithms (GAs) are efficient search methods based on principles of natural selection and population genetics. They are being successfully applied to problems in business, engineering and science (Goldberg, 1994). GAs use randomized operators operating over a population of candidate solutions to generate new points in the search space. In the past few years, parallel genetic algorithms (PGAs) have been used to solve difficult problems. Hard problems need a bigger population and this translates directly into higher computational costs. The basic...