This paper presents a methodology for implementing natural language morphology in the functional language Haskell. The main idea behind is simple: instead of working with untyped regular expressions, which is the state of the art of morphology in computational linguistics, we use finite functions over hereditarily finite algebraic datatypes. The definitions of these datatypes and functions are the language-dependent part of the morphology. The languageindependent part consists of an untyped dictionary format which is used for synthesis of word forms, and a decorated trie, which is used for analysis. Functional Morphology builds on ideas introduced by Huet in his computational linguistics toolkit Zen, which he has used to implement the morphology of Sanskrit. The goal has been to make it easy for linguists, who are not trained as functional programmers, to apply the ideas to new languages. As a proof of the productivity of the

We describe how to embed a simple typed functional logic programming language in Haskell. The embedding is a natural extension of the Prolog embedding by Seres and Spivey [16]. To get full static typing we need to use the Haskell extensions of quantified types and the ST-monad. 1 Introduction Over the last ten to twenty years, there have been many attempts to combine the flavours of logic and functional programming [3]. Among these, the most well-known ones are the programming languages Curry [4], Escher [13], and Mercury [14]. Curry and Escher can be seen as variations on Haskell, where logic programming features are added. Mercury can be seen as an improvement of Prolog, where types and functional programming features are added. All three are completely new and autonomous languages. Defining a new programming language has as a drawback for the developer to build a new compiler, and for the user to learn a new language. A different approach which has gained a lot of popularity ...

Avhandlingen beskriver hur funktionell programmering kan användas för