Results 1 -
3 of
3
The Sociability of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments
- Educational Technology and Society
, 2002
"... There is much positive research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments in asynchronous distributed learning groups (DLGs). There is also research that shows that contemporary CSCL environments do not completely fulfil expectations on supporting interactive group learning, s ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 22 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
There is much positive research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments in asynchronous distributed learning groups (DLGs). There is also research that shows that contemporary CSCL environments do not completely fulfil expectations on supporting interactive group learning, shared understanding, social construction of knowledge, and acquisition of competencies. There appear to be two major pitfalls impeding achievement of the desired social interaction in CSCL environments: taking social interaction in groups for granted and the lack of attention paid to the social psychological dimension of social interaction outside of the task context. Current solutions offered to avoid the pitfalls placed responsibility on instructors and teachers to encourage collaborative learning and social interaction. To both free educators from this burden and be more cost effective, we propose an intelligent CSCL environment. The environment is based upon a theoretical framework that suggests embedding certain properties in the environment to act as social contextual facilitators- social affordances- to initiate and sustain learner’s social interactions. Finally, a group awareness widget (GAW)- a software tool providing the learner group awareness about the others in the task and in the non-task context- is introduced as an embodiment of this theoretical framework.
Web 2.0 and Higher Education: Pedagogical Implications
"... New cultural, educational and inter-personal phenomena are clearly emerging from the use of technologies capable of enhancing social networking (O’REILLY, 2005; OBLINGER & OBLINGER, 2005), but little research has been made addressing the psycho-pedagogical foundations and implications of this new te ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
New cultural, educational and inter-personal phenomena are clearly emerging from the use of technologies capable of enhancing social networking (O’REILLY, 2005; OBLINGER & OBLINGER, 2005), but little research has been made addressing the psycho-pedagogical foundations and implications of this new technologies. Departing from an analysis of the Social Web from diverse theoretical perspectives, namely Social Constructivism, Connectivism, Distributed Cognition, Situated Learning, and Collective Intelligence, we intend to address those challenges, in order to explore and clarify the potential and limitations of the so-called “Web 2.0 ” in Higher Education, from a psychological oriented perspective. 1.
Developing REALSpace: Discourse on a Student-Centered Creative Knowledge Environment for Virtual Communities of Learning
, 2009
"... This manuscript is to provide an action research report on the issues behind the prototyping of a student-centered creative knowledge environment (CKE), which focuses on developing student responsibility, making learning meaningful, promoting overt knowledge construction, performing learner assessme ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
This manuscript is to provide an action research report on the issues behind the prototyping of a student-centered creative knowledge environment (CKE), which focuses on developing student responsibility, making learning meaningful, promoting overt knowledge construction, performing learner assessment, and showcasing learner achievements. The primary idea is to create an electronic knowledge space where students are enabled to learn through constructing rich portfolios of knowledge work. The issue of learner responsibility lies in student’s willingness to identify learning deficits, setting goals, managing the learning process, and monitoring the learning strategies they use. The issue of meaningful learning lies in providing students with realistic problems, which are conducive to the development of capable problem solvers. The issue of active knowledge construction lies in providing students with opportunities to engage in high-level thinking, reflection, and articulation activities, with suitable support to scaffold students in their pursuit of active learning.

