Results

**1 - 2**of**2**### The ubiquity of conservative translations Emil Jeˇrábek ∗

, 2011

"... We study the notion of conservative translation between logics introduced by Feitosa and D’Ottaviano [7]. We show that classical propositional logic (CPC) is universal in the sense that every finitary consequence relation over a countable set of formulas can be conservatively translated into CPC. Th ..."

Abstract
- Add to MetaCart

We study the notion of conservative translation between logics introduced by Feitosa and D’Ottaviano [7]. We show that classical propositional logic (CPC) is universal in the sense that every finitary consequence relation over a countable set of formulas can be conservatively translated into CPC. The translation is computable if the consequence relation is decidable. More generally, we show that one can take instead of CPC a broad class of logics (extensions of a certain fragment of full Lambek calculus FL) including most nonclassical logics studied in the literature, hence in a sense, (almost) any two reasonable deductive systems can be conservatively translated into each other. We also provide some counterexamples, in particular the paraconsistent logic LP is not universal. 1

### The ubiquity of conservative translations Emil Jeˇrábek ∗

, 2012

"... We study the notion of conservative translation between logics introduced by Feitosa and D’Ottaviano [7]. We show that classical propositional logic (CPC) is universal in the sense that every finitary consequence relation over a countable set of formulas can be conservatively translated into CPC. Th ..."

Abstract
- Add to MetaCart

We study the notion of conservative translation between logics introduced by Feitosa and D’Ottaviano [7]. We show that classical propositional logic (CPC) is universal in the sense that every finitary consequence relation over a countable set of formulas can be conservatively translated into CPC. The translation is computable if the consequence relation is decidable. More generally, we show that one can take instead of CPC a broad class of logics (extensions of a certain fragment of full Lambek calculus FL) including most nonclassical logics studied in the literature, hence in a sense, (almost) any two reasonable deductive systems can be conservatively translated into each other. We also provide some counterexamples, in particular the paraconsistent logic LP is not universal. 1