Results 1 
5 of
5
Reasoning About Effects: Seeing the Wood Through the Trees (Extended Version)
"... Pure functional languages such as Haskell support programming with impure effects by exploiting mathematical notions such as monads, applicative functors, and arrows. However, in contrast to the wealth of research on the use of these notions to write effectful programs, there has been comparatively ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Pure functional languages such as Haskell support programming with impure effects by exploiting mathematical notions such as monads, applicative functors, and arrows. However, in contrast to the wealth of research on the use of these notions to write effectful programs, there has been comparatively little progress on reasoning about the resulting programs. In this article we focus on this problem, using a simple but instructive example concerned with relabelling binary trees. 1
Monads in Action
"... In functional programming, monadic characterizations of computational effects are normally understood denotationally: they describe how an effectful program can be systematically expanded or translated into a larger, pure program, which can then be evaluated according to an effectfree semantics. An ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
In functional programming, monadic characterizations of computational effects are normally understood denotationally: they describe how an effectful program can be systematically expanded or translated into a larger, pure program, which can then be evaluated according to an effectfree semantics. Any effectspecific operations expressible in the monad are also given purely functional definitions, but these definitions are only directly executable in the context of an already translated program. This approach thus takes an inherently Churchstyle view of effects: the nominal meaning of every effectful term in the program depends crucially on its type. We present here a complementary, operational view of monadic effects, in which an effect definition directly induces an imperative behavior of the new operations expressible in the monad. This behavior is formalized as additional operational rules for only the new constructs; it does not require any structural changes to the evaluation judgment. Specifically, we give a smallstep operational semantics of a prototypical functional language supporting programmerdefinable, layered effects, and show how this semantics naturally supports reasoning by familiar syntactic techniques, such as showing soundness of a Currystyle effecttype system by the progress+preservation method.
Fibrational Induction Meets Effects
"... Abstract. This paper provides several induction rules that can be used to prove properties of effectful data types. Our results are semantic in nature and build upon Hermida and Jacobs ’ fibrational formulation of induction for polynomial data types and its extension to all inductive data types by G ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. This paper provides several induction rules that can be used to prove properties of effectful data types. Our results are semantic in nature and build upon Hermida and Jacobs ’ fibrational formulation of induction for polynomial data types and its extension to all inductive data types by Ghani, Johann, and Fumex. An effectful data type µ(T F) is built from a functor F that describes data, and a monad T that computes effects. Our main contribution is to derive induction rules that are generic over all functors F and monads T such that µ(T F) exists. Along the way, we also derive a principle of definition by structural recursion for effectful data types that is similarly generic. Our induction rule is also generic over the kinds of properties to be proved: like the work on which we build, we work in a general fibrational setting and so can accommodate very general notions of properties, rather than just those of particular syntactic forms. We give examples exploiting the generality of our results, and show how our results specialize to those in the literature, particularly those of Filinski and Støvring. 1
found at the ENTCS Macro Home Page.
"... Replace this file with prentcsmacro.sty for your meeting, ..."
(Show Context)
found at the ENTCS Macro Home Page. The Coinductive Resumption Monad
"... this file with prentcsmacro.sty for your meeting, ..."
(Show Context)