Copyright © 2006, by the author(s).

The design of concurrent programs is error-prone due to the interaction between concurrently executing threads. Traditional automated techniques for finding errors in concurrent programs, such as model checking, explore all possible thread interleavings. Since the number of thread interleavings increases exponentially with the number of threads, such analyses have high computational complexity. In this paper, we present a novel analysis technique for concurrent programs that avoids this exponential complexity. Our analysis transforms a concurrent program into a sequential program that simulates the execution of a large subset of the behaviors of the concurrent program. The sequential program is then analyzed by a tool that only needs to understand the semantics of sequential execution. Our technique never reports false errors but may miss errors. We have implemented the technique in KISS, an automated checker for multithreaded C programs, and obtained promising initial results by using KISS to detect race conditions in Windows device drivers.

Abstract not found

Software model checking has been successful for sequential programs, where predicate abstraction offers suitable models, and counterexample-guided abstraction refinement permits the automatic inference of models. When checking concurrent programs, we need to abstract threads as well as the contexts in which they execute. Stateless context models, such as predicates on global variables, prove insufficient for showing the absence of race conditions in many examples. We therefore use richer context models, which combine (1) predicates for abstracting data state, (2) control ow quotients for abstracting control state, and (3) counters for abstracting an unbounded number of threads. We infer suitable context models automatically by a combination of counterexample-guided abstraction refinement, bisimulation minimization, circular assume-guarantee reasoning, and parametric reasoning about an unbounded number of threads. This algorithm, called CIRC, has been implemented in Blast and succeeds in checking many examples of nesC code for data races. In particular, Blast proves the absence of races in several cases where previous race checkers give false positives.

Abstract. We propose a new technique for the static analysis of concurrent programs comprised of multiple threads. In general, the problem is known to be undecidable even for programs with only two threads but where the threads communicate using CCS-style pairwise rendezvous [10]. However, in practice, a large fraction of concurrent programs can either be directly modeled as threads communicating solely using locks or can be reduced to such systems either by applying standard abstract interpretation techniques or by exploiting separation of control from data. For such a framework, we show that for the commonly occurring case of threads with nested access to locks, the problem is efficiently decidable. Our technique involves reducing the analysis of a concurrent program with multiple threads to individually analyzing augmented versions of the given threads. Thus not only yields decidability but also avoids construction of the state space of the concurrent program at hand and thus bypasses the state explosion problem making our technique scalable. We go on to show that for programs with threads that have non-nested access to locks, the static analysis problem for programs with even two threads becomes undecidable even for reachability, thus sharpening the result of [10]. As a case study, we consider the Daisy file system [1] which is a benchmark for analyzing the efficacy of different methodologies for debugging concurrent programs and show the existence of several bugs. 1

Abstract. Many symbolic software verification engines such as Slam and ESC/Java rely on automatic theorem provers. The existing theorem provers, such as Simplify, lack precise support for important programming language constructs such as pointers, structures and unions. This paper describes a theorem prover, Cogent, that accurately supports all ANSI-C expressions. The prover’s implementation is based on a machinelevel interpretation of expressions into propositional logic, and supports finite machine-level variables, bit operations, structures, unions, references, pointers and pointer arithmetic. When used by Slam during the model checking of over 300 benchmarks, Cogent’s improved accuracy reduced the number of Slam timeouts by half, increased the number of true errors found, and decreased the number of false errors. 1

Predicate abstraction is an automatic technique that can be used to find abstract models of large or infinite-state systems. In tools like Slam, where predicate abstraction is applied to software model checking, a number of heuristic approximations must be used to improve the performance of computing an abstraction from a set of predicates.

Model checking is an automated technique that can be used to determine whether a system satisfies certain required properties. To address the "state explosion" problem associated with this technique, we propose to integrate assume-guarantee verification at different phases of system development. During design, developers build abstract behavioral models of the system components and use them to establish key properties of the system. To increase the scalability of model checking at this level, we have developed techniques that automatically decompose the verification task by generating component assumptions for the properties to hold. The design-level artifacts are subsequently used to guide the implementation of the system, but also to enable more efficient reasoning at the source code-level. In particular, we propose to use design-level assumptions to similarly decompose the verification of the actual system implementation. We demonstrate our approach on a significant NASA application, where design-level models were used to identify and correct a safety property violation, and design-level assumptions allowed us to check successfully that the property was preserved by the implementation.

There has been considerable progress in the domain of software veri cation over the last few years. This advancement has been driven, to a large extent, by the emergence of powerful yet automated abstraction techniques like predicate abstraction. However, the state space explosion problem in model checking remains the chief obstacle to the practical veri cation of real-world distributed systems. Even in the case of purely sequential programs, a crucial requirement to make predicate abstraction eective is to use as few predicates as possible. This is because, in the worst case, the state space of the abstraction generated (and consequently the time and memory complexity of the abstraction process) is exponential in the number of predicates involved. In addition, for concurrent programs, the number of reachable states could grow exponentially with the number of components.

E#ective model-checking of modern object-oriented software systems requires providing support for program features such as dynamically created threads, heapallocated objects and garbage collection. These features have often proven problematic to treat using many previous model-checking frameworks that do not provide sophisticated heap representations and optimizations.