Results 1 -
4 of
4
On the size of Kakeya sets in finite fields
- J. AMS
, 2008
"... Abstract. A Kakeya set is a subset of � n, where � is a finite field of q elements, that contains a line in every direction. In this paper we show that the size of every Kakeya set is at least Cn · q n, where Cn depends only on n. This answers a question of Wolff [Wol99]. 1. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 15 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A Kakeya set is a subset of � n, where � is a finite field of q elements, that contains a line in every direction. In this paper we show that the size of every Kakeya set is at least Cn · q n, where Cn depends only on n. This answers a question of Wolff [Wol99]. 1.
Recent progress on the Kakeya conjecture
- Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Harmonic Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (El Escorial
, 2000
"... Abstract. We survey recent developments on the Kakeya problem. 1. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We survey recent developments on the Kakeya problem. 1.
An incidence bound for k-planes in F n and a planar variant of the Kakeya maximal function, preprint
"... We discuss a planar variant of the Kakeya maximal function in the setting of a vector space over a finite field. Using methods from incidence combinatorics, we demonstrate that the operator is bounded from L p to L q when 1 ≤ p ≤ kn+k+1 k(k+1) and 1 ≤ q ≤ (n − k)p ′. 1 ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We discuss a planar variant of the Kakeya maximal function in the setting of a vector space over a finite field. Using methods from incidence combinatorics, we demonstrate that the operator is bounded from L p to L q when 1 ≤ p ≤ kn+k+1 k(k+1) and 1 ≤ q ≤ (n − k)p ′. 1
THE (d, k) KAKEYA PROBLEM AND ESTIMATES FOR THE X-RAY TRANSFORM By
, 2007
"... A (d, k) set is a subset of Rd containing a translate of every k-dimensional disc of diameter 1. We show that if (1 + √ 2) k−1 + k> d and k ≥ 2, then every (d, k) set has positive Lebesgue measure. This improves a result of Bourgain, who showed that the analogous statement holds when 2k−1 +k ≥ d and ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
A (d, k) set is a subset of Rd containing a translate of every k-dimensional disc of diameter 1. We show that if (1 + √ 2) k−1 + k> d and k ≥ 2, then every (d, k) set has positive Lebesgue measure. This improves a result of Bourgain, who showed that the analogous statement holds when 2k−1 +k ≥ d and k ≥ 2. We obtain this improvement in two parts. First, we replace Bourgain’s main estimate with a simple recursive maximal operator bound involving mixed-norm estimates for the X-ray transform. This method allows us to simplify Bourgain’s proof, allows us to obtain improved bounds for the maximal operator associated with (d, k) sets, and demonstrates that improved estimates for (d, k) sets would follow from new bounds for the X-ray transform. Second, we adapt arithmetic-combinatorial methods of Katz and Tao to obtain improved bounds for the X-ray transform suitable for use with the recursive maximal operator bound. Acknowledgements ii I would first like to thank my advisor, Andreas Seeger. Through my years in Madison, he has continuously sought opportunities for me to grow as a mathematician, and he has always looked out for my best interests. I hope to help my future students as much

