object encapsulation and enable local reasoning about program correctness in object-oriented languages. However, a type system that enforces strict object encapsulation is too constraining: it does not allow e#cient implementation of important constructs like iterators. This paper argues that the right way to solve the problem is to allow objects of classes defined in the same module to have privileged access to each other's representations; we show how to do this for inner classes. This approach allows programmers to express constructs like iterators and yet supports local reasoning about the correctness of the classes, because a class and its inner classes together can be reasoned about as a module. The paper also sketches how we use our variant of ownership types to enable e#cient software upgrades in persistent object stores.

Ownership types provide a statically enforceable notion of object-level encapsulation. We extend ownership types with computational e#ects to support reasoning about objectoriented programs. The ensuing system provides both access control and e#ects reporting. Based on this type system, we codify two formal systems for reasoning about aliasing and the disjointness of computational e#ects. The first can be used to prove that evaluation of two expressions will never lead to aliases, while the latter can be used to show the non-interference of two expressions.

Ownership types promise to provide a practical mechanism for enforcing stronger encapsulation by controlling aliasing in objectoriented languages. However, previous ownership type proposals have tied the aliasing policy of a system to the mechanism of ownership. As a result, these proposals are too weak to express many important aliasing constraints, yet also so restrictive that they prohibit many useful programming idioms. In this paper, we propose ownership domains, which decouple encapsulation policy from the mechanism of ownership in two key ways. First, developers can specify multiple ownership domains for each object, permitting a fine-grained control of aliasing compared to systems that provide only one ownership domain for each object. Second, developers can specify the permitted aliasing between each pair of domains in the system, providing more flexibility compared to systems that enforce a fixed policy for inter-domain aliasing. Because it decouples policy from mechanism, our alias control system is both more precise and more flexible than previous ownership type systems.

Abstract. External uniqueness is a surprising new way to add unique references to an OOPL. The idea is that an externally unique reference is the only reference into an aggregate from outside the aggregate. Internal references which do not escape the boundary of the aggregate are innocuous and therefore permitted. Based on ownership types, our proposal not only overcomes an abstraction problem from which existing uniqueness proposals suffer, it also enables many examples which are inherently not unique, such as a unique reference to a set of links in a doubly-linked list, without losing the benefits of uniqueness. 1

In order to study rigorously object-oriented languages such as Java or C , a common practice is to define lightweight fragments, or calculi, which are sufficiently small to facilitate formal proofs of key properties. However many of the current proposals for calculi lack important language features. In this paper we propose Middleweight Java, MJ, as a contender for a minimal imperative core calculus for Java. Whilst compact, MJ models features such as object identity, field assignment, constructor methods and block structure. We define the syntax, type system and operational semantics of MJ, and give a proof of type safety. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of MJ to reason about operational features, we consider a recent proposal of Greenhouse and Boyland to extend Java with an effects system. This effects system is intended to delimit the scope of computational effects within a Java program. We define an extension of MJ with a similar effects system and instrument the operational semantics. We then prove the correctness of the effects system

Making software reliable is one of the most important technological challenges facing our society today. This thesis presents a new type system that addresses this problem by statically preventing several important classes of programming errors. If a program type checks, we guarantee at compile time that the program does not contain any of those errors. We designed our type system in the context of a Java-like object-oriented language; we call the resulting system SafeJava. The SafeJava type system offers significant software engineering benefits. Specifically, it provides a statically enforceable way of specifying object encapsulation and enables local reasoning about program correctness; it combines effects clauses with encapsulation to enable modular checking of methods in the presence of subtyping; it statically prevents data races and deadlocks in multithreaded programs, which are known to be some of the most difficult programming errors to detect, reproduce, and

Abstract not found

The state of knowledge in how to specify sequential programs in object-oriented languages such as Java and C# and the state of the art in automated verification tools for such programs have made measurable progress in the last several years. This paper describes several remaining challenges and approaches to their solution.

In a previous paper, we discussed how the concepts of uniqueness and effects are interdependent. In this paper, we show how "Adoption and Focus," a proposal for handling linear pointers in shared variables can be extended to connect the two concepts. Our innovations include the ability to define adoption relations between individual fields rather than whole objects, and the ability to "focus" on more than one adoptee at a time. The resulting system uses recursive alias types, "permission closures" and "conditional permissions." Then we show how previously proposed effect and uniqueness annotations can be represented in the type system.

Existing ownership type systems require objects to have precisely one primary owner, organizing the heap into an ownership tree. Unfortunately, a tree structure is too restrictive for many programs, and prevents many common design patterns where multiple objects interact. Multiple Ownership is an ownership type system where objects can have more than one owner, and the resulting ownership structure forms a DAG. We give a straightforward model for multiple ownership, focusing in particular on how multiple ownership can support a powerful effects system that determines when two computations interfere — in spite of the DAG structure. We present a core programming language MOJO, Multiple Ownership for Java-like Objects, including a type and effects system, and soundness proof. In comparison to other systems, MOJO imposes absolutely no restrictions on pointers, modifications or programs’ structure, but in spite of this, MOJO’s effects can be used to reason about or describe programs ’ behaviour.