Results 1  10
of
36
Learning Stochastic Logic Programs
, 2000
"... Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) have been shown to be a generalisation of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), stochastic contextfree grammars, and directed Bayes' nets. A stochastic logic program consists of a set of labelled clauses p:C where p is in the interval [0,1] and C is a firstorder range ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1057 (69 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) have been shown to be a generalisation of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), stochastic contextfree grammars, and directed Bayes' nets. A stochastic logic program consists of a set of labelled clauses p:C where p is in the interval [0,1] and C is a firstorder rangerestricted definite clause. This paper summarises the syntax, distributional semantics and proof techniques for SLPs and then discusses how a standard Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system, Progol, has been modied to support learning of SLPs. The resulting system 1) nds an SLP with uniform probability labels on each definition and nearmaximal Bayes posterior probability and then 2) alters the probability labels to further increase the posterior probability. Stage 1) is implemented within CProgol4.5, which differs from previous versions of Progol by allowing userdefined evaluation functions written in Prolog. It is shown that maximising the Bayesian posterior function involves nding SLPs with short derivations of the examples. Search pruning with the Bayesian evaluation function is carried out in the same way as in previous versions of CProgol. The system is demonstrated with worked examples involving the learning of probability distributions over sequences as well as the learning of simple forms of uncertain knowledge.
A Logic for Reasoning about Probabilities
 Information and Computation
, 1990
"... We consider a language for reasoning about probability which allows us to make statements such as “the probability of E, is less than f ” and “the probability of E, is at least twice the probability of E,, ” where E, and EZ are arbitrary events. We consider the case where all events are measurable ( ..."
Abstract

Cited by 215 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider a language for reasoning about probability which allows us to make statements such as “the probability of E, is less than f ” and “the probability of E, is at least twice the probability of E,, ” where E, and EZ are arbitrary events. We consider the case where all events are measurable (i.e., represent measurable sets) and the more general case, which is also of interest in practice, where they may not be measurable. The measurable case is essentially a formalization of (the propositional fragment of) Nilsson’s probabilistic logic. As we show elsewhere, the general (nonmeasurable) case corresponds precisely to replacing probability measures by DempsterShafer belief functions. In both cases, we provide a complete axiomatization and show that the problem of deciding satistiability is NPcomplete, no worse than that of propositional logic. As a tool for proving our complete axiomatizations, we give a complete axiomatization for reasoning about Boolean combinations of linear inequalities, which is of independent interest. This proof and others make crucial use of results from the theory of linear programming. We then extend the language to allow reasoning about conditional probability and show that the resulting logic is decidable and completely axiomatizable, by making use of the theory of real closed fields. ( 1990 Academic Press. Inc 1.
Modelling a PublicKey Infrastructure
, 1996
"... A global publickey infrastructure (PKI), components of which are emerging in the near future, is a prerequisite for security in distributed systems and for electronic commerce. The purpose of this paper is to propose an approach to modelling and reasoning about a PKI from a user Alice's point ..."
Abstract

Cited by 140 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A global publickey infrastructure (PKI), components of which are emerging in the near future, is a prerequisite for security in distributed systems and for electronic commerce. The purpose of this paper is to propose an approach to modelling and reasoning about a PKI from a user Alice's point of view. Her view, from which she draws conclusions about the authenticity of other entities' public keys and possibly about the trustworthiness of other entities, consists of statements about which public keys she believes to be authentic and which entities she believes to be trustworthy, as well as a collection of certificates and recommendations obtained or retrieved from the PKI. The model takes into account recommendations for the trustworthiness of entities. Furthermore, it includes confidence values for statements and can exploit arbitrary certification structures containing multiple intersecting certification paths to achieve a higher confidence value than for any single c...
Soft Computing: the Convergence of Emerging Reasoning Technologies
 Soft Computing
, 1997
"... The term Soft Computing (SC) represents the combination of emerging problemsolving technologies such as Fuzzy Logic (FL), Probabilistic Reasoning (PR), Neural Networks (NNs), and Genetic Algorithms (GAs). Each of these technologies provide us with complementary reasoning and searching methods to so ..."
Abstract

Cited by 51 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The term Soft Computing (SC) represents the combination of emerging problemsolving technologies such as Fuzzy Logic (FL), Probabilistic Reasoning (PR), Neural Networks (NNs), and Genetic Algorithms (GAs). Each of these technologies provide us with complementary reasoning and searching methods to solve complex, realworld problems. After a brief description of each of these technologies, we will analyze some of their most useful combinations, such as the use of FL to control GAs and NNs parameters; the application of GAs to evolve NNs (topologies or weights) or to tune FL controllers; and the implementation of FL controllers as NNs tuned by backpropagationtype algorithms.
Probabilistic logic and probabilistic networks
, 2008
"... While in principle probabilistic logics might be applied to solve a range of problems, in practice they are rarely applied at present. This is perhaps because they seem disparate, complicated, and computationally intractable. However, we shall argue in this programmatic paper that several approaches ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
While in principle probabilistic logics might be applied to solve a range of problems, in practice they are rarely applied at present. This is perhaps because they seem disparate, complicated, and computationally intractable. However, we shall argue in this programmatic paper that several approaches to probabilistic logic fit into a simple unifying framework: logically complex evidence can be used to associate probability intervals or probabilities with sentences. Specifically, we show in Part I that there is a natural way to present a question posed in probabilistic logic, and that various inferential procedures provide semantics for that question: the standard probabilistic semantics (which takes probability functions as models), probabilistic argumentation (which considers the probability of a hypothesis being a logical consequence of the available evidence), evidential probability (which handles reference classes and frequency data), classical statistical inference
A Logic for Reasoning about Upper Probabilities
, 2002
"... We present a propositional logic to reason about the uncertainty of events, where the uncertainty is modeled by a set of probability measures assigning an interval of probability to each event. We give a sound and complete axiomatization for the logic, and show that the satisfiability problem is ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a propositional logic to reason about the uncertainty of events, where the uncertainty is modeled by a set of probability measures assigning an interval of probability to each event. We give a sound and complete axiomatization for the logic, and show that the satisfiability problem is NPcomplete, no harder than satisfiability for propositional logic.
On Cautious Probabilistic Inference and Default Detachment
, 1995
"... Conditional probabilities are one promising and widely used approach to model uncertainty in information systems. This paper discusses the DUCKcalculus, which is founded on the cautious approach to uncertain probabilistic inference. Based on a set of sound inference rules derived probabilistic info ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Conditional probabilities are one promising and widely used approach to model uncertainty in information systems. This paper discusses the DUCKcalculus, which is founded on the cautious approach to uncertain probabilistic inference. Based on a set of sound inference rules derived probabilistic information is gained by local bounds propagation techniques. Precision being always a central point of criticism to such systems, we demonstrate that DUCK need not necessarily suffer from these problems. We can show that the popular Bayesian networks are subsumed by DUCK, implying that precise probabilities can be deduced by local propagation techniques, even in the multiply connected case. A comparative study with INFERNO and with inference techniques based on global operationresearch techniques yields quite favorable results for our approach. Since conditional probabilities are also suited to model nonmonotonic situations by considering different contexts, we investigate the problems of maximal and relevant contexts, needed to draw default conclusions about individuals.
MetaAgent Programs
, 1998
"... There are numerous applications where one agent a needs to reason about the beliefs of another agent, as well as about the actions that other agents may take. Eiter, Subrahmanian, and Pick (1998) introduced the concept of an agent program, and provided a language within which the operating principle ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
There are numerous applications where one agent a needs to reason about the beliefs of another agent, as well as about the actions that other agents may take. Eiter, Subrahmanian, and Pick (1998) introduced the concept of an agent program, and provided a language within which the operating principles of an agent could be declaratively encoded on top of imperative data structures. We first introduce certain belief data structures that an agent needs to maintain. Then we introduce the concept of a Meta Agent Program (map), that extends the (Eiter, Subrahmanian, and Pick 1998) framework, so as to allow agents to peform metareasoning. We build a formal semantics for maps, and show how this semantics supports not just beliefs agent a may have about agent b's state, but also beliefs about agents b's beliefs about agent c's actions, beliefs about b's beliefs about agent c's state, and so on. Finally, we provide a translation that takes any map as input and converts it into an agent program s...
A nonnumeric approach to uncertain reasoning
 International Journal of General Systems
, 1995
"... This paper presents a nonnumeric approach to uncertain reasoning by extending the incidence calculus. In parallel to the well known fuzzy, belief/plausibility, probability, and necessity/possibility measures, the corresponding classes of nonnumeric functions are examined. A method of constructing ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a nonnumeric approach to uncertain reasoning by extending the incidence calculus. In parallel to the well known fuzzy, belief/plausibility, probability, and necessity/possibility measures, the corresponding classes of nonnumeric functions are examined. A method of constructing nonnumeric functions is discussed using the notion of compatibility relations. Nonnumeric functions are used to interpret uncertain reasoning by providing possibleworlds semantics for both qualitative and quantitative methods. INDEX TERMS: Belief/plausibility, fuzzy measure, incidence calculus, interval structure, necessity/possibility, probability, nonnumeric functions, rough sets, uncertain reasoning. 1 1
Semantics and derivation for Stochastic Logic Programs
, 2000
"... Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) are a generalisation of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), stochastic contextfree grammars, and undirected Bayes' nets. A pure stochastic logic program consists of a set of labelled clauses p:C where p is in the interval [0; 1] and C is a firstorder rangerestricte ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) are a generalisation of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), stochastic contextfree grammars, and undirected Bayes' nets. A pure stochastic logic program consists of a set of labelled clauses p:C where p is in the interval [0; 1] and C is a firstorder rangerestricted definite clause. SLPs have applications both as mechanisms for efficiently sampling from a given distribution and as representations for probabilistic knowledge. This paper discusses a distributional semantics for SLPs. Additionally two derivational mechanisms are introduced and analysed. These are 1) stochastic SLD (SelectionfunctionLinearresolutionfor Definiteclauses) refutation and 2) a program for enumerating the least Herbrand distributional model of an SLP in descending order. It is shown that as with logic programs unfolding transformations preserve the models of an SLP. Lastly, we discuss how Bayes' Theorem might be used to devise algorithms for learning SLPs. 1...