Results 1 - 10
of
59
Principles and implementation of deductive parsing
- JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING
, 1995
"... We present a system for generating parsers based directly on the metaphor of parsing as deduction. Parsing algorithms can be represented directly as deduction systems, and a single deduction engine can interpret such deduction systems so as to implement the corresponding parser. The method generaliz ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 150 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a system for generating parsers based directly on the metaphor of parsing as deduction. Parsing algorithms can be represented directly as deduction systems, and a single deduction engine can interpret such deduction systems so as to implement the corresponding parser. The method generalizes easily to parsers for augmented phrase structure formalisms, such as definiteclause grammars and other logic grammar formalisms, and has been used for rapid prototyping of parsing algorithms for a variety of formalisms including variants of tree-adjoining grammars, categorial grammars, and lexicalized context-free grammars.
The Equivalence Of Four Extensions Of Context-Free Grammars
- Mathematical Systems Theory
, 1994
"... There is currently considerable interest among computational linguists in grammatical formalisms with highly restricted generative power. This paper concerns the relationship between the class of string languages generated by several such formalisms viz. Combinatory Categorial Grammars, Head Grammar ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 64 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
There is currently considerable interest among computational linguists in grammatical formalisms with highly restricted generative power. This paper concerns the relationship between the class of string languages generated by several such formalisms viz. Combinatory Categorial Grammars, Head Grammars, Linear Indexed Grammars and Tree Adjoining Grammars. Each of these formalisms is known to generate a larger class of languages than Context-Free Grammars. The four formalisms under consideration were developed independently and appear superficially to be quite different from one another. The result presented in this paper is that all four of the formalisms under consideration generate exactly the same class of string languages. 1 Introduction There is currently considerable interest among computational linguists in grammatical formalisms with highly restricted generative power. This is based on the argument that a grammar formalism should not merely be viewed as a notation, but as part o...
The Computational Analysis of the Syntax and Interpretation of "Free" Word Order in Turkish
, 1995
"... ..."
Parsing Some Constrained Grammar Formalisms
- Computational Linguistics
, 1994
"... this paper we present a scheme to extend a recognition algorithm for Context-Free Grammars (CFG) that can be used to derive polynomial-time recognition algorithms for a set of formalisms that generate a superset of languages generated by CFG. We describe the scheme by developing a Cocke-Kasami-Young ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 51 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
this paper we present a scheme to extend a recognition algorithm for Context-Free Grammars (CFG) that can be used to derive polynomial-time recognition algorithms for a set of formalisms that generate a superset of languages generated by CFG. We describe the scheme by developing a Cocke-Kasami-Younger (CKY)-like pure bottom-up recognition algorithm for Linear Indexed Grammars and show how it can be adapted to give algorithms for Tree Adjoining Grammars and Combinatory Categorial Grammars. This is the only polynomial-time recognition algorithm for Combinatory Categorial Grammars that we are aware of
A Memory-Efficient Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Optimal Alignment of a Sequence to an RNA Secondary Structure
, 2002
"... Background: Covariance models (CMs) are probabilistic models of RNA secondary structure, analogous to profile hidden Markov models of linear sequence. The dynamic programming algorithm for aligning a CM to an RNA sequence of length N is O(N³) in memory. This is only practical for small RNAs. Re ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 51 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Background: Covariance models (CMs) are probabilistic models of RNA secondary structure, analogous to profile hidden Markov models of linear sequence. The dynamic programming algorithm for aligning a CM to an RNA sequence of length N is O(N³) in memory. This is only practical for small RNAs. Results:...
Models of Computation -- Exploring the Power of Computing
"... Theoretical computer science treats any computational subject for which a good model can be created. Research on formal models of computation was initiated in the 1930s and 1940s by Turing, Post, Kleene, Church, and others. In the 1950s and 1960s programming languages, language translators, and oper ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 46 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Theoretical computer science treats any computational subject for which a good model can be created. Research on formal models of computation was initiated in the 1930s and 1940s by Turing, Post, Kleene, Church, and others. In the 1950s and 1960s programming languages, language translators, and operating systems were under development and therefore became both the subject and basis for a great deal of theoretical work. The power of computers of this period was limited by slow processors and small amounts of memory, and thus theories (models, algorithms, and analysis) were developed to explore the efficient use of computers as well as the inherent complexity of problems. The former subject is known today as algorithms and data structures, the latter computational complexity. The focus of theoretical computer scientists in the 1960s on languages is reflected in the first textbook on the subject, Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata by John Hopcroft and Jeffrey Ullman. This influential book led to the creation of many languagecentered theoretical computer science courses; many introductory theory courses today continue to reflect the content of this book and the interests of theoreticians of the 1960s and early 1970s. Although
Efficiency, Robustness and Accuracy in Picky Chart Parsing
- UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
, 1992
"... This paper describes Picky, a probabilistic agenda-based chart parsing algorithm which uses a technique called probabilistic prediction to predict which grammar rules are likely to lead to an acceptable parse of the input. Using a suboptimal search method, Picky significantly reduces the number of e ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 43 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper describes Picky, a probabilistic agenda-based chart parsing algorithm which uses a technique called probabilistic prediction to predict which grammar rules are likely to lead to an acceptable parse of the input. Using a suboptimal search method, Picky significantly reduces the number of edges produced by CKY-like chart parsing algorithms, while maintaining the robustness of pure bottom-up parsers and the accuracy of existing probabilistic parsers. Experiments using Picky demonstrate how probabilistic modelling can impact upon the efficiency, robustness and accuracy of a parser.
Polynomial Time and Space Shift-Reduce Parsing of Arbitrary Context-free Grammars
, 1991
"... We introduce an algorithm for designing a predictive left to right shift-reduce non-deterministic push-down machine corresponding to an arbitrary unrestricted context-free grammar and an algorithm for efficiently driving this machine in pseudo-parallel. The performance of the resulting parser is for ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 26 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We introduce an algorithm for designing a predictive left to right shift-reduce non-deterministic push-down machine corresponding to an arbitrary unrestricted context-free grammar and an algorithm for efficiently driving this machine in pseudo-parallel. The performance of the resulting parser is formally proven to be superior to Earley's parser (1970). The technique employed consists in constructing before run-time a parsing table that encodes a nondeterministic machine in the which the predictive behavior has been compiled out. At run time, the machine is driven in pseudo-parallel with the help of a chart.
Fast Context-Free Grammar Parsing Requires Fast Boolean Matrix Multiplication
, 2002
"... In 1975, Valiant showed that Boolean matrix multiplication can be used for parsing context-free grammars (CFGs), yielding the asympotically fastest (although not practical) CFG parsing algorithm known. We prove a dual result: any CFG parser with time complexity $O(g n^{3 - \epsilson})$, where $g$ is ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In 1975, Valiant showed that Boolean matrix multiplication can be used for parsing context-free grammars (CFGs), yielding the asympotically fastest (although not practical) CFG parsing algorithm known. We prove a dual result: any CFG parser with time complexity $O(g n^{3 - \epsilson})$, where $g$ is the size of the grammar and $n$ is the length of the input string, can be efficiently converted into an algorithm to multiply $m \times m$ Boolean matrices in time $O(m^{3 - \epsilon/3})$. Given that practical, substantially sub-cubic Boolean matrix multiplication algorithms have been quite difficult to find, we thus explain why there has been little progress in developing practical, substantially sub-cubic general CFG parsers. In proving this result, we also develop a formalization of the notion of parsing.

