We address the problem of robust clustering by combining data partitions (forming a clustering ensemble) produced by multiple clusterings. We formulate robust clustering under an information-theoretical framework; mutual information is the underlying concept used in the definition of quantitative measures of agreement or consistency between data partitions. Robustness is assessed by variance of the cluster membership, based on bootstrapping. We propose and analyze a voting mechanism on pairwise associations of patterns for combining data partitions. We show that the proposed technique attempts to optimize the mutual information based criteria, although the optimality is not ensured in all situations. This evidence accumulation method is demonstrated by combining the well-known Kmeans algorithm to produce clustering ensembles. Experimental results show the ability of the technique to identify clusters with arbitrary shapes and sizes.

We consider the following problem: given a set of clusterings, find a clustering that agrees as much as possible with the given clusterings. This problem, clustering aggregation, appears naturally in various contexts. For example, clustering categorical data is an instance of the problem: each categorical variable can be viewed as a clustering of the input rows. Moreover, clustering aggregation can be used as a meta-clustering method to improve the robustness of clusterings. The problem formulation does not require apriori information about the number of clusters, and it gives a natural way for handling missing values. We give a formal statement of the clustering-aggregation problem, we discuss related work, and we suggest a number of algorithms. For several of the methods we provide theoretical guarantees on the quality of the solutions. We also show how sampling can be used to scale the algorithms for large data sets. We give an extensive empirical evaluation demonstrating the usefulness of the problem and of the solutions. 1

A data set can be clustered in many ways depending on the clustering algorithm employed, parameter settings used and other factors. Can multiple clusterings be combined so that the final partitioning of data provides better clustering? The answer depends on the quality of clusterings to be combined as well as the properties of the fusion method. First, we introduce a unified representation for multiple clusterings and formulate the corresponding categorical clustering problem. As a result, we show that the consensus function is related to the classical intra-class variance criterion using the generalized mutual information definition. Second, we show the efficacy of combining partitions generated by weak clustering algorithms that use data projections and random data splits. A simple explanatory model is offered for the behavior of combinations of such weak clustering components. We analyze the combination accuracy as a function of parameters controlling the power and resolution of component partitions as well as the learning dynamics vs. the number of clusterings involved. Finally, some empirical studies compare the effectiveness of several consensus functions.

Clustering ensembles have emerged as a powerful method for improving both the robustness and the stability of unsupervised classification solutions. However, finding a consensus clustering from multiple partitions is a difficult problem that can be approached from graph-based, combinatorial or statistical perspectives. We offer a probabilistic model of consensus using a finite mixture of multinomial distributions in a space of clusterings. A combined partition is found as a solution to the corresponding maximum likelihood problem using the EM algorithm. The excellent scalability of this algorithm and comprehensible underlying model are particularly important for clustering of large datasets. This study compares the performance of the EM consensus algorithm with other fusion approaches for clustering ensembles. We also analyze clustering ensembles with incomplete information and the effect of missing cluster labels on the quality of overall consensus. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on large real-world datasets.

We present a framework for clustering distributed data in unsupervised and semi-supervised scenarios, taking into account privacy requirements and communication costs. Rather than sharing parts of the original or perturbed data, we instead transmit the parameters of suitable generative models built at each local data site to a central location. We mathematically show that the best representative of all the data is a certain " mean" model, and empirically show that this model can be approximated quite well by generating artificial samples from the underlying distributions using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques, and then fitting a combined global model with a chosen parametric form to these samples. We also propose a new measure that quantifies privacy based on information theoretic concepts, and show that decreasing privacy leads to a higher quality of the combined model and vice versa. We provide empirical results on different data types to highlight the generality of our framework. The results show that high quality distributed clustering can be achieved with little privacy loss and low communication cost.

Clustering ensembles have emerged as a powerful method for improving both the robustness as well as the stability of unsupervised classification solutions. However, finding a consensus clustering from multiple partitions is a difficult problem that can be approached from graph-based, combinatorial or statistical perspectives. This study extends previous research on clustering ensembles in several respects. First, we introduce a unified representation for multiple clusterings and formulate the corresponding categorical clustering problem. Second, we propose a probabilistic model of consensus using a finite mixture of multinomial distributions in a space of clusterings. A combined partition is found as a solution to the corresponding maximum likelihood problem using the EM algorithm. Third, we define a new consensus function that is related to the classical intra-class variance criterion using the generalized mutual information definition. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of combining partitions generated by weak clustering algorithms that use data projections and random data splits. A simple explanatory model is offered for the behavior of combinations of such weak clustering components. Combination accuracy is analyzed as a function of several parameters that control the power and resolution of component partitions as well as the number of partitions. We also analyze clustering ensembles with incomplete information and the effect of missing cluster labels on the quality of overall consensus. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on several real-world datasets.

We explore the idea of evidence accumulation (EAC) for combining the results of multiple clusterings. First, a clustering ensemble- a set of object partitions, is produced. Given a data set (n objects or patterns in d dimensions), different ways of producing data partitions are: (1)- applying different clustering algorithms, and (2)- applying the same clustering algorithm with different values of parameters or initializations. Further, combinations of different data representations (feature spaces) and clustering algorithms can also provide a multitude of significantly different data partitionings. We propose a simple framework for extracting a consistent clustering, given the various partitions in a clustering ensemble. According to the EAC concept, each partition is viewed as an independent evidence of data organization, individual data partitions being combined, based on a voting mechanism, to generate a new n × n similarity matrix between the n patterns. The final data partition of the n patterns is obtained by applying a hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithm on this matrix. We have developed a theoretical framework for the analysis of the proposed clustering combination strategy and its evaluation, based on the concept of mutual information between data partitions. Stability of the results is evaluated using bootstrapping techniques. A detailed discussion of an evidence accumulation-based clustering algorithm, using a split and merge strategy based on the K-means clustering algorithm, is presented. Experimental results of the proposed method on several synthetic and real data sets are compared with other combination strategies, and with individual clustering results produced by well known clustering algorithms.

Three methods for combining multiple clustering systems are presented and evaluated, focusing on the problem of finding the correspondence between clusters of di#erent systems. In this work, the clusters of individual systems are represented in a common space and their correspondence estimated by either "clustering clusters" or with Singular Value Decomposition. The approaches are evaluated for the task of topic discovery on three major corpora and eight di#erent clustering algorithms and it is shown experimentally that combination schemes almost always o#er gains compared to single systems, but gains from using a combination scheme depend on the underlying clustering systems.

Clustering ensembles combine multiple partitions of the given data into a single clustering solution of better quality. Inspired by the success of supervised boosting algorithms, we devise an adaptive scheme for integration of multiple non-independent clusterings. Individual partitions in the ensemble are sequentially generated by clustering specially selected subsamples of the given data set. The sampling probability for each data point dynamically depends on the consistency of its previous assignments in the ensemble. New subsamples are drawn to increasingly focus on the problematic regions of the input feature space. A measure of a data point’s clustering consistency is defined to guide this adaptation. An empirical study compares the performance of adaptive and regular clustering ensembles using different consensus functions on a number of data sets. Experimental results demonstrate improved accuracy for some clustering structures. 1.

Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks are believed to be important sources of information related to biological processes and complex metabolic functions of the cell. The presence of biologically relevant functional modules in these networks has been theorized by many researchers. However, the application of traditional clustering algorithms for extracting these modules has not been successful, largely due to the presence of noisy false positive interactions as well as specific topological challenges in the network. In this paper, we propose an ensemble clustering framework to address this problem. For base clustering, we introduce two topology-based distance metrics to counteract the effects of noise. We develop a PCA-based consensus clustering technique, designed to reduce the dimensionality of the consensus problem and yield informative clusters. We also develop a soft consensus clustering variant to assign multifaceted proteins to multiple functional groups. We conduct an empirical evaluation of different consensus techniques using topology-based, information theoretic and domain-specific validation metrics and show that our approaches can provide significant benefits over other state-of-theart approaches. Our analysis of the consensus clusters obtained demonstrates that ensemble clustering can a) produce improved biologically significant functional groupings; and b) facilitate soft clustering by discovering multiple functional associations for proteins. 1.