Results 1  10
of
80
Multiparty Communication Complexity
, 1989
"... A given Boolean function has its input distributed among many parties. The aim is to determine which parties to tMk to and what information to exchange with each of them in order to evaluate the function while minimizing the total communication. This paper shows that it is possible to obtain the Boo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 703 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A given Boolean function has its input distributed among many parties. The aim is to determine which parties to tMk to and what information to exchange with each of them in order to evaluate the function while minimizing the total communication. This paper shows that it is possible to obtain the Boolean answer deterministically with only a polynomial increase in communication with respect to the information lower bound given by the nondeterministic communication complexity of the function.
Complexity Limitations on Quantum Computation
 Journal of Computer and System Sciences
, 1997
"... We use the powerful tools of counting complexity and generic oracles to help understand the limitations of the complexity of quantum computation. We show several results for the probabilistic quantum class BQP.  BQP is low for PP, i.e., PP BQP = PP.  There exists a relativized world where P = ..."
Abstract

Cited by 96 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We use the powerful tools of counting complexity and generic oracles to help understand the limitations of the complexity of quantum computation. We show several results for the probabilistic quantum class BQP.  BQP is low for PP, i.e., PP BQP = PP.  There exists a relativized world where P = BQP and the polynomialtime hierarchy is infinite.  There exists a relativized world where BQP does not have complete sets.  There exists a relativized world where P = BQP but P 6= UP " coUP and oneway functions exist. This gives a relativized answer to an open question of Simon.
An oracle builder’s toolkit
, 2002
"... We show how to use various notions of genericity as tools in oracle creation. In particular, 1. we give an abstract definition of genericity that encompasses a large collection of different generic notions; 2. we consider a new complexity class AWPP, which contains BQP (quantum polynomial time), and ..."
Abstract

Cited by 46 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We show how to use various notions of genericity as tools in oracle creation. In particular, 1. we give an abstract definition of genericity that encompasses a large collection of different generic notions; 2. we consider a new complexity class AWPP, which contains BQP (quantum polynomial time), and infer several strong collapses relative to SPgenerics; 3. we show that under additional assumptions these collapses also occur relative to Cohen generics; 4. we show that relative to SPgenerics, ULIN ∩ coULIN ̸ ⊆ DTIME(n k) for any k, where ULIN is unambiguous linear time, despite the fact that UP ∪ (NP ∩ coNP) ⊆ P relative to these generics; 5. we show that there is an oracle relative to which NP/1∩coNP/1 ̸ ⊆ (NP∩coNP)/poly; and 6. we use a specialized notion of genericity to create an oracle relative to which NP BPP ̸ ⊇ MA.
The Role of Relativization in Complexity Theory
 Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science
, 1994
"... Several recent nonrelativizing results in the area of interactive proofs have caused many people to review the importance of relativization. In this paper we take a look at how complexity theorists use and misuse oracle results. We pay special attention to the new interactive proof systems and progr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Several recent nonrelativizing results in the area of interactive proofs have caused many people to review the importance of relativization. In this paper we take a look at how complexity theorists use and misuse oracle results. We pay special attention to the new interactive proof systems and program checking results and try to understand why they do not relativize. We give some new results that may help us to understand these questions better.
Limits on the Provable Consequences of Oneway Functions
, 1989
"... This technical point will prevent the reader from suspecting any measuretheoretic fallacy. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 36 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This technical point will prevent the reader from suspecting any measuretheoretic fallacy.
The Complexity of Computation on the Parallel Random Access Machine
, 1993
"... PRAMs also approximate the situation where communication to and from shared memory is much more expensive than local operations, for example, where each processor is located on a separate chip and access to shared memory is through a combining network. Not surprisingly, abstract PRAMs can be much m ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
PRAMs also approximate the situation where communication to and from shared memory is much more expensive than local operations, for example, where each processor is located on a separate chip and access to shared memory is through a combining network. Not surprisingly, abstract PRAMs can be much more powerful than restricted instruction set PRAMs. THEOREM 21.16 Any function of n variables can be computed by an abstract EROW PRAM in O(log n) steps using n= log 2 n processors and n=2 log 2 n shared memory cells. PROOF Each processor begins by reading log 2 n input values and combining them into one large value. The information known by processors are combined in a binarytreelike fashion. In each round, the remaining processors are grouped into pairs. In each pair, one processor communicates the information it knows about the input to the other processor and then leaves the computation. After dlog 2 ne rounds, one processor knows all n input values. Then this processor computes th...
Two Applications of Information Complexity
, 2003
"... We show the following new lower bounds in two concrete complexity models: (1) In the twoparty communication complexity model, we show that the tribes function on n inputs [6] has twosided error randomized complexity # n), while its nondeterminstic complexity and conondeterministic complexity are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show the following new lower bounds in two concrete complexity models: (1) In the twoparty communication complexity model, we show that the tribes function on n inputs [6] has twosided error randomized complexity # n), while its nondeterminstic complexity and conondeterministic complexity are both #( # n). This separation between randomized and nondeterministic complexity is the best possible and it settles an open problem in Kushilevitz and Nisan [17], which was also posed by Beame and Lawry [5].
Improved learning of AC 0 functions
 In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory
, 1991
"... Two extensions of the Linial, Mansour, Nisan AC 0 learning algorithm are presented. The LMN method works when input examples are drawn uniformly. The new algorithms improve on theirs by performing well when given inputs drawn from unknown, mutually independent distributions. A variant of the one of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Two extensions of the Linial, Mansour, Nisan AC 0 learning algorithm are presented. The LMN method works when input examples are drawn uniformly. The new algorithms improve on theirs by performing well when given inputs drawn from unknown, mutually independent distributions. A variant of the one of the algorithms is conjectured to work in an even broader setting. 1
Separability and Oneway Functions
, 2000
"... We settle all relativized questions of the relationships between the following ve propositions: P = NP P = UP P = NP \ coNP All disjoint pairs of NP sets are Pseparable. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We settle all relativized questions of the relationships between the following ve propositions: P = NP P = UP P = NP \ coNP All disjoint pairs of NP sets are Pseparable.