Results 1  10
of
104
Compositional Model Checking
, 1999
"... We describe a method for reducing the complexity of temporal logic model checking in systems composed of many parallel processes. The goal is to check properties of the components of a system and then deduce global properties from these local properties. The main difficulty with this type of approac ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2395 (62 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a method for reducing the complexity of temporal logic model checking in systems composed of many parallel processes. The goal is to check properties of the components of a system and then deduce global properties from these local properties. The main difficulty with this type of approach is that local properties are often not preserved at the global level. We present a general framework for using additional interface processes to model the environment for a component. These interface processes are typically much simpler than the full environment of the component. By composing a component with its interface processes and then checking properties of this composition, we can guarantee that these properties will be preserved at the global level. We give two example compositional systems based on the logic CTL*.
Experience with Predicate Abstraction
 IN COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION
, 1999
"... This reports some experiences with a recentlyimplemented prototype system for verification using predicate abstraction, based on the method of Graf and Saidi [9]. Systems are described using a language of iterated guarded commands, called MurOE \Gamma\Gamma (since it is a simplified version o ..."
Abstract

Cited by 130 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This reports some experiences with a recentlyimplemented prototype system for verification using predicate abstraction, based on the method of Graf and Saidi [9]. Systems are described using a language of iterated guarded commands, called MurOE \Gamma\Gamma (since it is a simplified version of our MurOE protocol description language). The system makes use of two libraries: SVC [1] (an efficient decision procedure for quantifierfree firstorder logic) and the CMU BDD library. The use of these libraries increases the scope of problems that can be handled by predicate abstraction through increased efficiency, especially in SVC, which is typically called thousands of times. The verification system also provides limited support for quantifiers in formulas. The system ...
Symbolic model checking with rich assertional languages
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1997
"... Abstract. The paper shows that, by an appropriate choice of a rich assertional language, it is possible to extend the utility of symbolic model checking beyond the realm of bddrepresented nitestate systems into the domain of in nitestate systems, leading to a powerful technique for uniform veri c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 89 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The paper shows that, by an appropriate choice of a rich assertional language, it is possible to extend the utility of symbolic model checking beyond the realm of bddrepresented nitestate systems into the domain of in nitestate systems, leading to a powerful technique for uniform veri cation of unbounded (parameterized) process networks. The main contributions of the paper are a formulation of a general framework for symbolic model checking of in nitestate systems, a demonstration that many individual examples of uniformly veri ed parameterized designs that appear in the literature are special cases of our general approach, verifying the correctness of the Futurebus+ design for all singlebus con gurations, extending the technique to tree architectures, and establishing that the presented method is a precise dual to the topdown invariant generation method used in deductive veri cation. 1
Reasoning about Rings
, 1995
"... The ring is a useful means of structuring concurrent processes. Processes communicate by passing a token in a fixed direction; the process that possesses the token is allowed to perfrom certain actions. Usually, correctness properties are expected to hold irrespective of the size of the ring. We sho ..."
Abstract

Cited by 80 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The ring is a useful means of structuring concurrent processes. Processes communicate by passing a token in a fixed direction; the process that possesses the token is allowed to perfrom certain actions. Usually, correctness properties are expected to hold irrespective of the size of the ring. We show that the problem of checking many useful correctness properties for rings of all sizes can be reduced to checking them on ring of sizes up to a small cutoff size. We apply our results to the verification of a mutual exclusion protocol and Milner's scheduler protocol. 1
Automatic Deductive Verification with Invisible Invariants
, 2001
"... The paper presents a method for the automatic verification of a certain class of parameterized systems. These are boundeddata systems consisting of N processes (N being the parameter), where each process is finitestate. First, we show that if we use the standard deductive inv rule for proving inva ..."
Abstract

Cited by 72 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper presents a method for the automatic verification of a certain class of parameterized systems. These are boundeddata systems consisting of N processes (N being the parameter), where each process is finitestate. First, we show that if we use the standard deductive inv rule for proving invariance properties, then all the generated verification conditions can be automatically resolved by finitestate (bddbased) methods with no need for interactive theorem proving. Next, we show how to use modelchecking techniques over finite (and small) instances of the parameterized system in order to derive candidates for invariant assertions. Combining this automatic computation of invariants with the previously mentioned resolution of the VCs (verification conditions) yields a (necessarily) incomplete but fully automatic sound method for verifying boundeddata parameterized systems. The generated invariants can be transferred to the VCvalidation phase without ever been examined by the user, which explains why we refer to them as "invisible". We illustrate the method on a nontrivial example of a cache protocol, provided by Steve German.
Automatic Verification of Parameterized Cache Coherence Protocols
, 2000
"... We propose a new method for the verification of parameterized cache coherence protocols. Cache coherence protocols are used to maintain data consistency in commercial multiprocessor systems equipped with local fast caches. In our approach we use arithmetic constraints to model possibly infinite sets ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose a new method for the verification of parameterized cache coherence protocols. Cache coherence protocols are used to maintain data consistency in commercial multiprocessor systems equipped with local fast caches. In our approach we use arithmetic constraints to model possibly infinite sets of global states of a multiprocessor system with many identical caches. In preliminary experiments using symbolic model checkers for infinitestate systems based on real arithmetics (HyTech [HHW97] and DMC [DP99]) we have automatically verified safety properties for parameterized versions of widely implemented writeinvalidate and writeupdate cache coherence policies like the Mesi, Berkeley, Illinois, Firey and Dragon protocols [Han93]. With this application, we show that symbolic model checking tools originally designed for hybrid and concurrent systems can be applied successfully to a new class of infinitestate systems of practical interest.
Utilizing Symmetry when Model Checking under Fairness Assumptions: An Automatatheoretic Approach
, 1999
"... ..."
On the Verification of Broadcast Protocols
 In Proc. 14th Annual Symp. on Logic in Computer Science (LICS'99
, 1999
"... We analyze the modelchecking problems for safety and liveness properties in parameterized broadcast protocols, a model introduced in [5]. We show that the procedure suggested in [5] for safety properties may not terminate, whereas termination is guaranteed for the procedure of [1] based on upward c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 66 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We analyze the modelchecking problems for safety and liveness properties in parameterized broadcast protocols, a model introduced in [5]. We show that the procedure suggested in [5] for safety properties may not terminate, whereas termination is guaranteed for the procedure of [1] based on upward closed sets. We show that the modelchecking problem for liveness properties is undecidable. In fact, even the problem of deciding if a broadcast protocol may exhibit an infinite behavior is undecidable.
Parameterized Verification with Automatically Computed Inductive Assertions
, 2001
"... The paper presents a method, called the method of verification by invisible invariants, for the automatic verification of a large class of parameterized systems. The method is based on the automatic calculation of candidate inductive assertions and checking for their inductiveness, using symbolic mo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 63 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper presents a method, called the method of verification by invisible invariants, for the automatic verification of a large class of parameterized systems. The method is based on the automatic calculation of candidate inductive assertions and checking for their inductiveness, using symbolic modelchecking techniques for both tasks. First, we show how to use modelchecking techniques over finite (and small) instances of the parameterized system in order to derive candidates for invariant assertions. Next, we show that the premises of the standard deductive inv rule for proving invariance properties can be automatically resolved by finitestate (bddbased) methods with no need for interactive theorem proving. Combining the automatic computation of invariants with the automatic resolution of the VCs (verification conditions) yields a (necessarily) incomplete but fully automatic sound method for verifying large classes of parameterized systems. The generated invariants can be transferred to the VCvalidation phase without ever been examined by the user, which explains why we refer to them as "invisible". The efficacy of the method is demonstrated by automatic verification of diverse parameterized systems in a fully automatic and efficient manner.
Undecidable Verification Problems for Programs with Unreliable Channels
 Information and Computation
, 1994
"... We consider the verification of a particular class of infinitestate systems, namely systems consisting of finitestate processes that communicate via unbounded lossy FIFO channels. This class is able to model e.g. link protocols such as the Alternating Bit Protocol and HDLC. In an earlier paper, we ..."
Abstract

Cited by 58 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the verification of a particular class of infinitestate systems, namely systems consisting of finitestate processes that communicate via unbounded lossy FIFO channels. This class is able to model e.g. link protocols such as the Alternating Bit Protocol and HDLC. In an earlier paper, we showed that the problems of checking reachability, safety properties, and eventuality properties are decidable for this class of systems. In this paper, we show that the following problems are undecidable, namely ffl The model checking problem in propositional temporal logics such as Propositional Linear Time Temporal Logic (PTL) and Computation Tree Logic (CTL). ffl The problem of deciding eventuality properties with fair channels: do all computations eventually reach a given set of states if the unreliable channels satisfy fairness assumptions. The results are obtained through a reduction from a variant of Post's Correspondence Problem. This research report is a revised and extended ...