Results 1  10
of
23
The Second Calculus of Binary Relations
 In Proceedings of MFCS'93
, 1993
"... We view the Chu space interpretation of linear logic as an alternative interpretation of the language of the Peirce calculus of binary relations. Chu spaces amount to Kvalued binary relations, which for K = 2 n we show generalize nary relational structures. We also exhibit a fourstage unique fa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 54 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We view the Chu space interpretation of linear logic as an alternative interpretation of the language of the Peirce calculus of binary relations. Chu spaces amount to Kvalued binary relations, which for K = 2 n we show generalize nary relational structures. We also exhibit a fourstage unique factorization system for Chu transforms that illuminates their operation. 1 Introduction In 1860 A. De Morgan [DM60] introduced a calculus of binary relations equivalent in expressive power to one whose formulas, written in today's notation, are inequalities a b between terms a; b; . . . built up from variables with the operations of composition a; b, converse a, and complement a \Gamma . In 1870 C.S. Peirce [Pei33] extended De Morgan's calculus with Boolean connectives a + b and ab, Boolean constants 0 and 1, and an identity 1 0 for composition. In 1895 E. Schroder devoted a book [Sch95] to the calculus, and further extended it with the operations of reflexive transitive closure, a ...
Dynamic Algebras as a wellbehaved fragment of Relation Algebras
 In Algebraic Logic and Universal Algebra in Computer Science, LNCS 425
, 1990
"... The varieties RA of relation algebras and DA of dynamic algebras are similar with regard to definitional capacity, admitting essentially the same equational definitions of converse and star. They differ with regard to completeness and decidability. The RA definitions that are incomplete with respect ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The varieties RA of relation algebras and DA of dynamic algebras are similar with regard to definitional capacity, admitting essentially the same equational definitions of converse and star. They differ with regard to completeness and decidability. The RA definitions that are incomplete with respect to representable relation algebras, when expressed in their DA form are complete with respect to representable dynamic algebras. Moreover, whereas the theory of RA is undecidable, that of DA is decidable in exponential time. These results follow from representability of the free intensional dynamic algebras. Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford, CA 94305. This paper is based on a talk given at the conference Algebra and Computer Science, Ames, Iowa, June 24, 1988. It will appear in the proceedings of that conference, to be published by SpringerVerlag in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science series. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number CCR8814921 ...
The Logic of Time Representation
, 1987
"... This investigation concerns representations of time by means of intervals, stemming from work of Allen [All83] and van Benthem [vBen83]. Allen described an Interval Calculus of thirteen binary relations on convex intervals over a linear order (the real numbers). He gave a practical algorithm for che ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This investigation concerns representations of time by means of intervals, stemming from work of Allen [All83] and van Benthem [vBen83]. Allen described an Interval Calculus of thirteen binary relations on convex intervals over a linear order (the real numbers). He gave a practical algorithm for checking the consistency of a subclass of Boolean constraints. First, we describe a completeness theorem for Allen's calculus, in its corresponding formulation as a firstorder theory LM . LM is countably categorical, and axiomatises the complete theory of intervals over a dense unbounded linear order. Its only countable model up to isomorphism is the nontrivial intervals over the rational numbers. Algorithms are given for quantiferelimination, consistency checking, and satisfaction of arbitrary firstorder formulas in the Interval Calculus. A natural countable model of the calculus is presented, the TUS , in which clock and calendartime may be represented in a straightforward way. Allen an...
Step by Step  Building Representations in Algebraic Logic
 Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1995
"... We consider the problem of finding and classifying representations in algebraic logic. This is approached by letting two players build a representation using a game. Homogeneous and universal representations are characterised according to the outcome of certain games. The Lyndon conditions defini ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of finding and classifying representations in algebraic logic. This is approached by letting two players build a representation using a game. Homogeneous and universal representations are characterised according to the outcome of certain games. The Lyndon conditions defining representable relation algebras (for the finite case) and a similar schema for cylindric algebras are derived. Countable relation algebras with homogeneous representations are characterised by first order formulas. Equivalence games are defined, and are used to establish whether an algebra is !categorical. We have a simple proof that the perfect extension of a representable relation algebra is completely representable. An important open problem from algebraic logic is addressed by devising another twoplayer game, and using it to derive equational axiomatisations for the classes of all representable relation algebras and representable cylindric algebras. Other instances of this ap...
Event Spaces and Their Linear Logic
 In AMAST’91: Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology, Workshops in Computing
, 1991
"... Boolean logic treats disjunction and conjunction symmetrically and algebraically. The corresponding operations for computation are respectively nondeterminism (choice) and concurrency. Petri nets treat these symmetrically but not algebraically, while event structures treat them algebraically but not ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Boolean logic treats disjunction and conjunction symmetrically and algebraically. The corresponding operations for computation are respectively nondeterminism (choice) and concurrency. Petri nets treat these symmetrically but not algebraically, while event structures treat them algebraically but not symmetrically. Here we achieve both via the notion of an event space as a poset with all nonempty joins representing concurrence and a top representing the unreachable event. The symmetry is with the dual notion of state space, a poset with all nonempty meets representing choice and a bottom representing the start state. The algebra is that of a parallel programming language expanded to the language of full linear logic, Girard's axiomatization of which is satisfied by the event space interpretation of this language. Event spaces resemble finite dimensional vector spaces in distinguishing tensor product from direct product and in being isomorphic to their double dual, but differ from them i...
Expressive Power and Complexity in Algebraic Logic
 Journal of Logic and Computation
, 1997
"... Two complexity problems in algebraic logic are surveyed: the satisfaction problem and the network satisfaction problem. Various complexity results are collected here and some new ones are derived. Many examples are given. The network satisfaction problem for most cylindric algebras of dimension four ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Two complexity problems in algebraic logic are surveyed: the satisfaction problem and the network satisfaction problem. Various complexity results are collected here and some new ones are derived. Many examples are given. The network satisfaction problem for most cylindric algebras of dimension four or more is shown to be intractable. Complexity is tiedin with the expressivity of a relation algebra. Expressivity and complexity are analysed in the context of homogeneous representations. The modeltheoretic notion of interpretation is used to generalise known complexity results to a range of other algebraic logics. In particular a number of relation algebras are shown to have intractable network satisfaction problems. 1 Introduction A basic problem in theoretical computing and applied logic is to select and evaluate the ideal formalism to represent and reason about a given application. Many different formalisms are adopted: classical firstorder logic, modal and temporal logics (either...
Complete Representations in Algebraic Logic
 JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC
"... A boolean algebra is shown to be completely representable if and only if it is atomic, whereas it is shown that neither the class of completely representable relation algebras nor the class of completely representable cylindric algebras of any fixed dimension (at least 3) are elementary. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A boolean algebra is shown to be completely representable if and only if it is atomic, whereas it is shown that neither the class of completely representable relation algebras nor the class of completely representable cylindric algebras of any fixed dimension (at least 3) are elementary.
Representability is not decidable for finite relation algebras
 Trans. Amer. Math. Soc
, 1999
"... Abstract. We prove that there is no algorithm that decides whether a finite relation algebra is representable. Representability of a finite relation algebra A is determined by playing a certain two player game G(A) over ‘atomic Anetworks’. It can be shown that the second player in this game has a w ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We prove that there is no algorithm that decides whether a finite relation algebra is representable. Representability of a finite relation algebra A is determined by playing a certain two player game G(A) over ‘atomic Anetworks’. It can be shown that the second player in this game has a winning strategy if and only if A is representable. Let τ be a finite set of square tiles, where each edge of each tile has a colour. Suppose τ includes a special tile whose four edges are all the same colour, a colour not used by any other tile. The tiling problem we use is this: is it the case that for each tile T ∈ τ there is a tiling of the plane Z × Z using only tiles from τ in which edge colours of adjacent tiles match and with T placed at (0, 0)? It is not hard to show that this problem is undecidable. From an instance of this tiling problem τ, we construct a finite relation algebra RA(τ) and show that the second player has a winning strategy in G(RA(τ)) if and only if τ is a yesinstance. This reduces the tiling problem to the representation problem and proves the latter’s undecidability. 1.
Relation Algebras of Intervals
 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
, 1994
"... Given a representation of a relation algebra we construct relation algebras of pairs and of intervals. If the representation happens to be complete, homogeneous and fully universal then the pair and interval algebras can be constructed direct from the relation algebra. If, further, the original rel ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Given a representation of a relation algebra we construct relation algebras of pairs and of intervals. If the representation happens to be complete, homogeneous and fully universal then the pair and interval algebras can be constructed direct from the relation algebra. If, further, the original relation algebra is !categorical we show that the interval algebra is too. The complexity of relation algebras is studied and it is shown that every pair algebra with infinite representations is intractable. Applications include constructing an interval algebra that combines metric and interval expressivity.
Relation Algebras with nDimensional Relational Bases
 Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 1999
"... We study relation algebras with ndimensional relational bases in the sense of Maddux. Fix n with 3 n !. Write Bn for the class of nonassociative algebras with an n dimensional relational basis, and RAn for the variety generated by Bn . We de ne a notion of representation for algebras in RAn , ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study relation algebras with ndimensional relational bases in the sense of Maddux. Fix n with 3 n !. Write Bn for the class of nonassociative algebras with an n dimensional relational basis, and RAn for the variety generated by Bn . We de ne a notion of representation for algebras in RAn , and use it to give an explicit (hence recursive) equational axiomatisation of RAn , and to reprove Maddux's result that RAn is canonical. We show that the algebras in Bn are precisely those that have a complete representation. Then we prove that whenever 4 n < l !, RA l is not nitely axiomatisable over RAn . This con rms a conjecture of Maddux. We also prove that Bn is elementary for n = 3; 4 only.