Abduction in Logic Programming started in the late 80s, early 90s, in an attempt to extend logic programming into a framework suitable for a variety of problems in Artificial Intelligence and other areas of Computer Science. This paper aims to chart out the main developments of the field over the last ten years and to take a critical view of these developments from several perspectives: logical, epistemological, computational and suitability to application. The paper attempts to expose some of the challenges and prospects for the further development of the field.

In this paper, we review recent work aimed at the application of declarative logic programming to knowledge representation in artificial intelligence. We consider exten- sions of the language of definite logic programs by classical (strong) negation, disjunc- tion, and some modal operators and show how each of the added features extends the representational power of the language.

We present an abstract framework for default reasoning, which includes Theorist, default logic, logic programming, autoepistemic logic, non-monotonic modal logics, and certain instances of circumscription as special cases. The framework can be understood as a generalisation of Theorist. The generalisation allows any theory formulated in a monotonic logic to be extended by a defeasible set of assumptions. An assumption can be defeated (or "attacked") if its "contrary" can be proved, possibly with the aid of other conflicting assumptions. We show that, given such a framework, the standard semantics of most logics for default reasoning can be understood as sanctioning a set of assumptions, as an extension of a given theory, if and only if the set of assumptions is conflict-free (in the sense that it does not attack itself) and it attacks every assumption not in the set. We propose a more liberal, argumentation-theoretic semantics, based upon the notion of admissible extension in logic pro...

The aim of this paper is to provide a semantics for general logic programs (with negation by default) extended with explicit negation, subsuming well founded semantics [22]. The Well Founded semantics for extended logic programs (WFSX) is expressible by a default theory semantics we have devised [11]. This relationship improves the cross-fertilization between logic programs and default theories, since we generalize previous results concerning their relationship [3, 4, 7, 1, 2], and there is an increasing use of logic programming with explicit negation for nonmonotonic reasoning [7, 15, 16, 13, 23]. It also clarifies the meaning of logic programs combining both explicit negation and negation by default. In particular, it shows that explicit negation corresponds exactly to classical negation in the default theory, and elucidates the use of rules in logic programs. Like defaults, rules are unidirectional, so their contrapositives are not implicit; the rule connective, /, is not materi...

The notion of assumption-based framework generalises and refines the use of abduction to give a formalisation of non-monotonic reasoning. In this framework, a sentence is a non-monotonic consequence of a theory if it can be derived monotonically from a theory extended by means of acceptable assumptions. The notion of acceptability for such assumptions is formulated in terms of their ability successfully to "counterattack" any "attacking" set of assumptions. One set of assumptions is said to "attack" another if the first set monotonically implies a consequence which is inconsistent with an assumption in the second set. This argumentation-theoretic criterion of acceptability is based on notions first introduced for logic programming and used to give a unified account of such diverse semantics for logic programming as stable models, partial stable models, preferred extensions, stable theories, well-founded semantics, and stationary semantics. The new framework makes it possible to general...

Recently several authors have stressed and showed the importance of having a second kind of negation in logic programs for use in deductive databases, knowledge representation, and nonmonotonic reasoning [6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 24]. Different semantics for logic programs extended with :-negation (extended logic programs) have appeared [1, 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 17, 19, 24] but, contrary to what happens with semantics for normal logic programs, there is no general comparison among them, specially in what concerns the use and meaning of the newly introduced :-negation. The goal of this paper is to contrast a variety of these semantics in what concerns their use and meaning of :-negation, and its relation to classical negation and to the default negation of normal programs, here denoted by not : To this purpose we define a parametrizeable schema to encompass and characterize a diversity of proposed semantics for extended logic programs, where the parameters are two: one the axioms AX: defin...

Abstract not found

Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non-- monotonic reasoning problems with the Well Founded Semantics WFS of extended logic programs augmented with eXplicit negation (WFSX), augmented by its Contradiction Removal Semantics (CRSX) when needed. We apply this semantics, and its contradiction removal semantics counterpart, to represent non-monotonic reasoning problems. We show how to cast in the language of logic programs extended with explicit negation such forms of non-monotonic reasoning as defeasible reasoning, abductive reasoning and hypothetical reasoning and apply them to such different domains of knowledge representation as hierarchies and reasoning about actions. We then abstract a modular systematic method of representing non-monotonic problems in a logic programming semantics comprising two forms of negation avoiding some drawbacks of other proposals, with which we relate our work.

This paper presents declarative semantics of possibly inconsistent disjunctive logic programs. We introduce the paraconsistent minimal and stable model semantics for extended disjunctive programs, which can distinguish inconsistent information from others in a program. These semantics are based on lattice-structured multi-valued logics, and are characterized by a new fixpoint semantics of extended disjunctive programs. Applications of the paraconsistent semantics for reasoning in inconsistent programs are also presented. Keywords: Extended disjunctive programs, inconsistency, multi-valued logic, paraconsistent stable model semantics. 3 Journal of Logic and Computation 5: 265-285, Oxford University Press, 1995. 1 1

The present prolegomena consist, as all indeed do, in a critical discussion serving to introduce and interpret the extended works that follow in this book. As a result, the book is not a mere collection of excellent papers in their own specialty, but provides also the basics of the motivation, background history, important themes, bridges to other areas, and a common technical platform of the principal formalisms and approaches, augmented with examples. In the