Abstract. The proliferation of online text, such as found on the World Wide Web and in online databases, motivates the need for space-efficient text indexing methods that support fast string searching. We model this scenario as follows: Consider a text T consisting of n symbols drawn from a fixed alphabet Σ. The text T can be represented in n lg |Σ | bits by encoding each symbol with lg |Σ | bits. The goal is to support fast online queries for searching any string pattern P of m symbols, with T being fully scanned only once, namely, when the index is created at preprocessing time. The text indexing schemes published in the literature are greedy in terms of space usage: they require Ω(n lg n) additional bits of space in the worst case. For example, in the standard unit cost RAM, suffix trees and suffix arrays need Ω(n) memory words, each of Ω(lg n) bits. These indexes are larger than the text itself by a multiplicative factor of Ω(lg |Σ | n), which is significant when Σ is of constant size, such as in ascii or unicode. On the other hand, these indexes support fast searching, either in O(m lg |Σ|) timeorinO(m +lgn) time, plus an output-sensitive cost O(occ) for listing the occ pattern occurrences. We present a new text index that is based upon compressed representations of suffix arrays and suffix trees. It achieves a fast O(m / lg |Σ | n +lgɛ |Σ | n) search time in the worst case, for any constant

We present a novel implementation of compressed suffix arrays exhibiting new tradeoffs between search time and space occupancy for a given text (or sequence) of n symbols over an alphabet Σ, where each symbol is encoded by lg |Σ | bits. We show that compressed suffix arrays use just nHh + O(n lg lg n / lg |Σ | n) bits, while retaining full text indexing functionalities, such as searching any pattern sequence of length m in O(m lg |Σ | + polylog(n)) time. The term Hh ≤ lg |Σ | denotes the hth-order empirical entropy of the text, which means that our index is nearly optimal in space apart from lower-order terms, achieving asymptotically the empirical entropy of the text (with a multiplicative constant 1). If the text is highly compressible so that Hh = o(1) and the alphabet size is small, we obtain a text index with o(m) search time that requires only o(n) bits. Further results and tradeoffs are reported in the paper. 1

Full-text indexes provide fast substring search over large text collections. A serious problem of these indexes has traditionally been their space consumption. A recent trend is to develop indexes that exploit the compressibility of the text, so that their size is a function of the compressed text length. This concept has evolved into self-indexes, which in addition contain enough information to reproduce any text portion, so they replace the text. The exciting possibility of an index that takes space close to that of the compressed text, replaces it, and in addition provides fast search over it, has triggered a wealth of activity and produced surprising results in a very short time, and radically changed the status of this area in less than five years. The most successful indexes nowadays are able to obtain almost optimal space and search time simultaneously. In this paper we present the main concepts underlying self-indexes. We explain the relationship between text entropy and regularities that show up in index structures and permit compressing them. Then we cover the most relevant self-indexes up to date, focusing on the essential aspects on how they exploit the text compressibility and how they solve efficiently various search problems. We aim at giving the theoretical background to understand and follow the developments in this area.

We consider the implementation of abstract data types for the static objects: binary tree, rooted ordered tree and balanced parenthesis expression. Our representations use an amount of space within a lower order term of the information theoretic minimum and support, in constant time, a richer set of navigational operations than has previously been considered in similar work. In the case of binary trees, for instance, we can move from a node to its left or right child or to the parent in constant time while retaining knowledge of the size of the subtree at which we are positioned. The approach is applied to produce succinct representation of planar graphs in which one can test adjacency in constant time. Keywords: abstract data type, succinct representation, binary trees, balanced parenthesis, rooted ordered trees, planar graphs. AMS subject classifications: 68P05, 68Q65 1 Introduction The binary tree is among the most fundamental of data structures. While it is often the c...

Abstract. Given a sequence S = s1s2... sn of integers smaller than r = O(polylog(n)), we show how S can be represented using nH0(S) + o(n) bits, so that we can know any sq, as well as answer rank and select queries on S, in constant time. H0(S) is the zero-order empirical entropy of S and nH0(S) provides an Information Theoretic lower bound to the bit storage of any sequence S via a fixed encoding of its symbols. This extends previous results on binary sequences, and improves previous results on general sequences where those queries are answered in O(log r) time. For larger r, we can still represent S in nH0(S) + o(n log r) bits and answer queries in O(log r / log log n) time. Another contribution of this paper is to show how to combine our compressed representation of integer sequences with an existing compression boosting technique to design compressed full-text indexes that scale well with the size of the input alphabet Σ. Namely, we design a variant of the FM-index that indexes a string T [1, n] within nHk(T) + o(n) bits of storage, where Hk(T) is the k-th order empirical entropy of T. This space bound holds simultaneously for all k ≤ α log |Σ | n, constant 0 < α < 1, and |Σ | = O(polylog(n)). This index counts the occurrences of an arbitrary pattern P [1, p] as a substring of T in O(p) time; it locates each pattern occurrence in O(log 1+ε n) time, for any constant 0 < ε < 1; and it reports a text substring of length ℓ in O(ℓ + log 1+ε n) time.

Let a text of u characters over an alphabet of size be compressible to n symbols by the LZ78 or LZW algorithm. We show that it is possible to build a data structure based on the Ziv-Lempel trie that takes 4n log 2 n(1+o(1)) bits of space and reports the R occurrences of a pattern of length m in worst case time O(m log(m)+(m+R)log n).

A compressed text database based on the compressed suffix array is proposed. The compressed su#x array of Grossi and Vitter occupies only O(n) bits for a text of length n; however it also uses the text itself that occupies O(n log bits for the alphabet #. On the other hand, our data structure does not use the text itself, and supports important operations for text databases: inverse, search and decompress. Our algorithms can find occ occurrences of any substring P of the text

We first give a representation of a suffix tree that uses n lg n + O(n) bits of space and supports searching for a pattern in the given text (from a fixed size alphabet) in O(m) time, where n is the size of the text and m is the size of the pattern. The structure is quite simple and answers a question raised by Muthukrishnan in [17]. Previous compact representations of suffix trees had a higher lower order term in space and had some expectation assumption [3], or required more time for searching [5]. Then, surprisingly, we show that we can even do better, by developing a structure that uses a suffix array (and so ndlg ne bits) and an additional o(n) bits. String searching can be done in this structure also in O(m) time. Besides supporting string searching, we can also report the number of occurrences of the pattern in the same time using no additional space. In this case the space occupied...

We introduce two succinct data structures to solve various string problems. One is for storing the information of lcp, the longest common prefix, between suffixes in the suffix array, and the other is an improvement in the compressed suffix array which supports linear time counting queries for any pattern. The former occupies only 2n + o(n) bits for a text of length n for computing lcp between adjacent suffixes in lexicographic order in constant time, and 6n + o(n) bits between any two suffixes. No data structure in the literature attained linear size. The latter has size proportional to the text size and it is applicable to texts on any alphabet &Sigma; such that |&Sigma;| = log^O(1) n. These space-economical data structures are useful in processing huge amounts of text data.

A succinct full-text self-index is a data structure built on a text T = t1t2...tn, which takes little space (ideally close to that of the compressed text), permits efficient search for the occurrences of a pattern P = p1p2... pm in T, and is able to reproduce any text substring, so the self-index replaces the text. Several remarkable self-indexes have been developed in recent years. Many of those take space proportional to nH0 or nHk bits, where Hk is the kth order empirical entropy of T. The time to count how many times does P occur in T ranges from O(m) to O(m log n). In this paper we present a new self-index, called RLFM index for “run-length FM-index”, that counts the occurrences of P in T in O(m) time when the alphabet size is σ = O(polylog(n)). The RLFM index requires nHk log σ + O(n) bits of space, for any k ≤ α log σ n and constant 0 < α < 1. Previous indexes that achieve O(m) counting time either require more than nH0 bits of space or require that σ = O(1). We also show that the RLFM index can be enhanced to locate occurrences in the text and display text substrings in time independent of σ. In addition, we prove a close relationship between the kth order entropy of the text and some regularities that show up in their suffix arrays and in the Burrows-Wheeler transform of T. This relationship is of independent interest and permits bounding the space occupancy of the RLFM index, as well as that of other existing compressed indexes. Finally, we present some practical considerations in order to implement the RLFM index, obtaining two implementations with different space-time tradeoffs. We empirically compare our indexes against the best existing implementations and show that they are practical and competitive against those. 1