We present two logical systems for reasoning about cryptographic constructions which are sound with respect to standard cryptographic definitions of security. Soundness of the first system is proved using techniques from nonstandard models of arithmetic. Soundness of the second system is proved by an interpretation into the first system. We also present examples of how these systems may be used to formally prove the correctness of some elementary cryptographic constructions.

The higher than classical efficiency exhibited by some quantum algorithms is here ascribed to their non-mechanistic character, which becomes evident by joining the notions of entanglement and quantum measurement. Measurement analogically sets a (partial) constraint on the output of the computation of a hard-to-reverse function. This constraint goes back in time along the reversible computation process, computing the reverse function, which yields quantum efficiency. The evolution, comprising wave function collapse (here a revamped notion), is non-mechanistic as it is driven by both an initial condition and a final constraint. It seems that the more the output is constrained by measurement, the higher can be the efficiency. Setting a complete constraint, by means of a special Zeno effect, yields (speculatively) NP-complete=P. I.

Selection of conference papers