To meet the demands of modern architectures, optimizing compilers must incorporate an ever larger number of increasingly complex transformation algorithms. Since code transformations may often degrade performance or interfere with subsequent transformations, compilers employ predictive heuristics to guide optimizations by predicting their effects a priori. Unfortunately, the unpredictability of optimization interaction and the irregularity of today’s wide-issue machines severely limit the accuracy of these heuristics. As a result, compiler writers may temper high variance optimizations with overly conservative heuristics or may exclude these optimizations entirely. While this process results in a compiler capable of generating good average code quality across the target benchmark set, it is at the cost of missed optimization opportunities in individual code segments. To replace predictive heuristics, researchers have proposed compilers which explore many optimization options, selecting the best one a posteriori. Unfortunately, these existing iterative compilation techniques are not practical for reasons of compile time and applicability. In this paper, we present the Optimization-Space Exploration (OSE) compiler organization, the first practical iterative compilation strategy applicable to optimizations in general-purpose compilers. Instead of replacing predictive heuristics, OSE uses the compiler writer’s knowledge encoded in the heuristics to select a small number of promising optimization alternatives for a given code segment. Compile time is limited by evaluating only these alternatives for hot code segments using a general compiletime performance estimator. An OSE-enhanced version of Intel’s highly-tuned, aggressively optimizing production compiler for IA-64 yields a significant performance improvement, more than 20 % in some cases, on Itanium for SPEC codes. 1.

Loop tiling and unrolling are two important program transformations to exploit locality and expose instruction level parallelism, respectively. However, these transformations are not independent and each can adversely affect the goal of the other. Furthermore, the best combination will vary dramatically from one processor to the next. In this paper, we therefore address the problem of how to select tile sizes and unroll factors simultaneously. We approach this problem in an architecturally adaptive manner by means of iterative compilation, where we generate many versions of a program and decide upon the best by actually executing them and measuring their execution time. We evaluate several iterative strategies based on genetic algorithms, random sampling and simulated annealing. We compare the levels of optimization obtained by iterative compilation to several well-known static techniques and show that we outperform each of them on a range of benchmarks across a variety of ar...

In this paper we investigate the feasibility of iterative compilation in program optimisation. This technique enables compilers to deliver efficient code by searching for the best sequence of optimisations. In embedded systems, long compilation time can be afforded since the application is an integral part of the shipped product. However, in practice search spaces may be extremely large. Our experimental results show that in the case of large transformation spaces, near optimal transformations can be found by visiting only a small fraction of the entire search space by using a simple search algorithm.

This article aims at making iterative optimization practical and usable by speeding up the evaluation of a large range of optimizations. Instead of using a full run to evaluate a single program optimization, we take advantage of periods of stable performance, called phases. For that purpose, we propose a low-overhead phase detection scheme geared toward fast optimization space pruning, using code instrumentation and versioning implemented in a production compiler. Our approach is driven by simplicity and practicality. We show that a simple phase detection scheme can be sufficient for optimization space pruning. We also show it is possible to search for complex optimizations at run-time without resorting to sophisticated dynamic compilation frameworks. Beyond iterative optimization, our approach also enables one to quickly design selftuned applications.

Emerging microprocessors offer unprecedented parallel computing capabilities and deeper memory hierarchies, increasing the importance of loop transformations in optimizing compilers. Because compiler heuristics rely on simplistic performance models, and because they are bound to a limited set of transformations sequences, they only uncover a fraction of the peak performance on typical benchmarks. Iterative optimization is a maturing framework to address these limitations, but so far, it was not successfully applied complex loop transformation sequences because of the combinatorics of the optimization search space. We focus on the class of loop transformation which can be expressed as one-dimensional affine schedules. We define a systematic exploration method to enumerate the space of all legal, distinct transformations in this class. This method is based on an upstream characterization, as opposed to state-of-the-art downstream filtering approaches. Our results demonstrate orders of magnitude improvements in the size of the search space and in the convergence speed of a dedicated iterative optimization heuristic. 1.

High-level loop optimizations are necessary to achieve good performance over a wide variety of processors. Their performance impact can be significant because they involve in-depth program transformations that aiming to sustain a balanced workload over the computational, storage, and communication resources of the target architecture. Therefore, it is mandatory that the compiler accurately models the target architecture and the effects of complex code restructuring. However, because optimizing compilers (1) use simplistic performance models that abstract away many of the complexities of modern architectures, (2) rely on inaccurate dependence analysis, and (3) lack frameworks to express complex interactions of transformation sequences, they typically uncover only a fraction of the peak performance available on many applications. We propose a complete iterative framework to address these issues. We rely on the polyhedral model to construct and traverse a large and expressive search space. This space encompasses only legal, distinct versions resulting from the restructuring of any static control loop nest. We first propose a feedback-driven iterative heuristic tailored to the search space properties of the polyhedral model. Though, it quickly converges to good solutions for small kernels, larger benchmarks containing higher dimensional spaces are more challenging and our heuristic misses opportunities for significant performance improvement. Thus, we introduce the use of a genetic algorithm with specialized operators that leverage the polyhedral representation of program dependences. We provide experimental evidence that the genetic algorithm effectively traverses huge optimization spaces, achieving good performance improvements on large loop nests.

Efficient implementation of DSP applications is critical for many embedded systems. Optimising C compilers for embedded processors largely focus on code generation and instruction scheduling which, with their growing maturity, are providing diminishing returns. This paper empirically evaluates another approach, namely source-level transformations and the probabilistic feedback-driven search for “good ” transformation sequences within a large optimisation space. This novel approach combines two selection methods: one based on exploring the optimisation space, the other focused on localised search of good areas. This technique was applied to the UTDSP benchmark suite on two digital signal and multimedia processors (Analog Devices TigerSHARC TS-101, Philips TriMedia TM-1100) and an embedded processor derived from a popular general-purpose processor architecture (Intel Celeron 400). On average, our approach gave a factor of 1.71 times improvement across all platforms equivalent to an average 41 % reduction in execution time, outperforming existing approaches. In certain cases a speedup of up to ≈ 7 was found for individual benchmarks.

Abstract not found

The phase-ordering problem is a long standing issue for compiler writers. Most optimizing compilers typically have numerous different code-improving phases, many of which can be applied in any order. These phases interact by enabling or disabling opportunities for other optimization phases to be applied. As a result, varying the order of applying optimization phases to a program can produce different code, with potentially significant performance variation amongst them. Complicating this problem further is the fact that there is no universal optimization phase order that will produce the best code, since the best phase order depends on the function being compiled, the compiler, and the target architecture characteristics. Moreover, finding the optimal optimization sequence for even a single function is hard

Modern compilers implement a large number of optimizations which all interact in complex ways, and which all have a different impact on code quality, compilation time, code size, energy consumption, etc. For this reason, compilers typically provide a limited number of standard optimization levels, such as-O1,-O2,-O3 and-Os, that combine various optimizations providing a number of trade-offs between multiple objective functions (such as code quality, compilation time and code size). The construction of these optimization levels, i.e., choosing which optimizations to activate at each level, is a manual process typically done using high-level heuristics based on the compiler developer’s experience. This paper proposes COLE, Compiler Optimization Level Exploration, a framework for automatically finding Pareto optimal optimization levels through multi-objective evolutionary searching. Our experimental results using GCC and the SPEC CPU benchmarks show that the automatic construction of optimization levels is feasible in practice, and in addition, yields better optimization levels than GCC’s manually derived (-Os,-O1,-O2 and-O3) optimization levels, as well as the optimization levels obtained through random sampling. We also demonstrate that COLE can be used to gain insight into the effectiveness of compiler optimizations as well as to better understand a benchmark’s sensitivity to compiler optimizations.