Monads are commonplace programming devices that are used to uniformly structure computations with effects such as state, exceptions, and I/O. This paper further develops the monadic programming paradigm by investigating the extent to which monadic computations can be optimised by using generalisations of short cut fusion to eliminate monadic structures whose sole purpose is to “glue together ” monadic program components. We make several contributions. First, we show that every inductive type has an associated build combinator and an associated short cut fusion rule. Second, we introduce the notion of an inductive monad to describe those monads that give rise to inductive types, and we give examples of such monads which are widely used in functional programming. Third, we generalise the standard augment combinators and cata/augment fusion rules for algebraic data types to types induced by inductive monads. This allows us to give the first cata/augment rules for some common data types, such as rose trees. Fourth, we demonstrate the practical applicability of our generalisations by providing Haskell implementations for all concepts and examples in the paper. Finally, we offer deep theoretical insights by showing that the augment combinators are monadic in nature, and thus that our cata/build and cata/augment rules are arguably the best generally applicable fusion rules obtainable.

Fusion is the process of improving the efficiency of modularly constructed programs by transforming them into monolithic equivalents. This paper defines a generalization of the standardbuild combinator which expresses uniform production of functorial contexts containing data of inductive types. It also proves correct a fusion rule which generalizes thefold/build andfold/buildp rules from the literature, and eliminates intermediate data structures of inductive types without disturbing the contexts in which they are situated. An important special case arises when this context is monadic. When it is, a second rule for fusing combinations of producers and consumers via monad operations, rather than via composition, is also available. We give examples illustrating both rules, and consider their coalgebraic duals as well.