Results 1  10
of
19
The Essence of Principal Typings
 In Proc. 29th Int’l Coll. Automata, Languages, and Programming, volume 2380 of LNCS
, 2002
"... Let S be some type system. A typing in S for a typable term M is the collection of all of the information other than M which appears in the final judgement of a proof derivation showing that M is typable. For example, suppose there is a derivation in S ending with the judgement A M : # meanin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 86 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Let S be some type system. A typing in S for a typable term M is the collection of all of the information other than M which appears in the final judgement of a proof derivation showing that M is typable. For example, suppose there is a derivation in S ending with the judgement A M : # meaning that M has result type # when assuming the types of free variables are given by A. Then (A, #) is a typing for M .
Expansion: the Crucial Mechanism for Type Inference with Intersection Types: Survey and Explanation
 In: (ITRS ’04
, 2005
"... The operation of expansion on typings was introduced at the end of the 1970s by Coppo, Dezani, and Venneri for reasoning about the possible typings of a term when using intersection types. Until recently, it has remained somewhat mysterious and unfamiliar, even though it is essential for carrying ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The operation of expansion on typings was introduced at the end of the 1970s by Coppo, Dezani, and Venneri for reasoning about the possible typings of a term when using intersection types. Until recently, it has remained somewhat mysterious and unfamiliar, even though it is essential for carrying out compositional type inference. The fundamental idea of expansion is to be able to calculate the effect on the final judgement of a typing derivation of inserting a use of the intersectionintroduction typing rule at some (possibly deeply nested) position, without actually needing to build the new derivation.
Branching Types
, 2002
"... Although systems with intersection types have many unique capabilities, there has never been a fully satisfactory explicitly typed system with intersection types. We introduce and prove the basic properties of # , a typed #calculus with branching types and types with quantification over type ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Although systems with intersection types have many unique capabilities, there has never been a fully satisfactory explicitly typed system with intersection types. We introduce and prove the basic properties of # , a typed #calculus with branching types and types with quantification over type selection parameters. The new system # an explicitly typed system with the same expressiveness as a system with intersection types. Typing derivations in # use branching types to squash together what would be separate parallel derivations in earlier systems with intersection types.
Implementing Compositional Analysis Using Intersection Types with Expansion Variables
, 2002
"... A program analysis is compositional when the analysis result for a particular program fragment is obtained solely from the results for its immediate subfragments via some composition operator. This means the subfragments can be analyzed independently in any order. Many commonly used program analysis ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A program analysis is compositional when the analysis result for a particular program fragment is obtained solely from the results for its immediate subfragments via some composition operator. This means the subfragments can be analyzed independently in any order. Many commonly used program analysis techniques (in particular, most abstract interpretations and most uses of the Hindley/Milner type system) are not compositional and require the entire text of a program for sound and complete analysis.
Types, potency, and idempotency: why nonlinearity and amnesia make a type system work
 In ICFP ’04: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, 138–149, ACM
, 2004
"... Useful type inference must be faster than normalization. Otherwise, you could check safety conditions by running the program. We analyze the relationship between bounds on normalization and type inference. We show how the success of type inference is fundamentally related to the amnesia of the type ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Useful type inference must be faster than normalization. Otherwise, you could check safety conditions by running the program. We analyze the relationship between bounds on normalization and type inference. We show how the success of type inference is fundamentally related to the amnesia of the type system: the nonlinearity by which all instances of a variable are constrained to have the same type. Recent work on intersection types has advocated their usefulness for static analysis and modular compilation. We analyze SystemI (and some instances of its descendant, System E), an intersection type system with a type inference algorithm. Because SystemI lacks idempotency, each occurrence of a variable requires a distinct type. Consequently, type inference is equivalent to normalization in every single case, and time bounds on type inference and normalization are identical. Similar relationships hold for other intersection type systems without idempotency. The analysis is founded on an investigation of the relationship between linear logic and intersection types. We show a lockstep correspondence between normalization and type inference. The latter shows the promise of intersection types to facilitate static analyses of varied granularity, but also belies an immense challenge: to add amnesia to such analysis without losing all of its benefits.
Strict Intersection Types for the Lambda Calculus
, 2010
"... This paper will show the usefulness and elegance of strict intersection types for the Lambda Calculus; these are strict in the sense that they are the representatives of equivalence classes of types in the BCDsystem [15]. We will focus on the essential intersection type assignment; this system is a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper will show the usefulness and elegance of strict intersection types for the Lambda Calculus; these are strict in the sense that they are the representatives of equivalence classes of types in the BCDsystem [15]. We will focus on the essential intersection type assignment; this system is almost syntax directed, and we will show that all major properties hold that are known to hold for other intersection systems, like the approximation theorem, the characterisation of (head/strong) normalisation, completeness of type assignment using filter semantics, strong normalisation for cutelimination and the principal pair property. In part, the proofs for these properties are new; we will briefly compare the essential system with other existing systems.
A Functional Language for Logarithmic Space
 In APLAS
, 2004
"... More than being just a tool for expressing algorithms, a welldesigned programming language allows the user to express her ideas efficiently. The design choices however effect the efficiency of the algorithms written in the languages. It is therefore of importance to understand how such choices effe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
More than being just a tool for expressing algorithms, a welldesigned programming language allows the user to express her ideas efficiently. The design choices however effect the efficiency of the algorithms written in the languages. It is therefore of importance to understand how such choices effect the expressibility of programming languages. The paper pursues the very low complexity programs by presenting a firstorder function algebra BC # that captures exactly LF, the functions computable in logarithmic space. This gives insights into the expressiveness of recursion. Moreover, it can be useful for the automatic analysis of programs' resource usage and the separation of complexity classes. The important technical features of BC # are (1) a separation of variables into safe and normal variables where recursion can only be done over the latter; (2) linearity of the recursive call; and (3) recursion with a variable step length (courseofvalue recursion). Unlike formulations LF via Turin Machines, BC # makes no references to outside resource measures, e.g., the size of the memory used. This appears to be the first such characterization of LFcomputable functions (not just predicates). The proof that all BC #programs can be evaluated in LF is of separate interest to programmers: it trades space for time and evaluates recursion with at most one recursive call without a call stack.
Rank 2 Types for Term Graph Rewriting (Extended Abstract)
"... We define a notion of type assignment with polymorphic intersection types of rank 2 fora term graph rewriting language that expresses sharing and cycles. We show that type assignment is decidable through defining, using the extended notion of unification from [5],a notion of principal pair which gen ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We define a notion of type assignment with polymorphic intersection types of rank 2 fora term graph rewriting language that expresses sharing and cycles. We show that type assignment is decidable through defining, using the extended notion of unification from [5],a notion of principal pair which generalizes ml's principal type property.
Iterator types
 IN PROCEEDINGS OF FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE SCIENCE AND COMPUTATION STRUCTURES, (FOSSACS’07), VOLUME 4423 OF LNCS
, 2007
"... System L is a linear λcalculus with numbers and an iterator, which, although imposing linearity restrictions on terms, has all the computational power of Gödel’s System T. System L owes its power to two features: the use of a closed reduction strategy (which permits the construction of an iterator ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
System L is a linear λcalculus with numbers and an iterator, which, although imposing linearity restrictions on terms, has all the computational power of Gödel’s System T. System L owes its power to two features: the use of a closed reduction strategy (which permits the construction of an iterator on an open function, but only iterates the function after it becomes closed), and the use of a liberal typing rule for iterators based on iterative types. In this paper, we study these new types, and show how they relate to intersection types. We also give a sound and complete type reconstruction algorithm for System L.
On Typability for Rank2 Intersection Types with Polymorphic Recursion ∗
"... We show that typability for a natural form of polymorphic recursive typing for rank2 intersection types is undecidable. Our proof involves characterizing typability as a context free language (CFL) graph problem, which may be of independent interest, and reduction from the boundedness problem for T ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that typability for a natural form of polymorphic recursive typing for rank2 intersection types is undecidable. Our proof involves characterizing typability as a context free language (CFL) graph problem, which may be of independent interest, and reduction from the boundedness problem for Turing machines. We also show a property of the type system which, in conjunction with the undecidability result, disproves a misconception about the MilnerMycroft type system. We also show undecidability of a related program analysis problem. 1