Results 1  10
of
61
A Randomized LinearTime Algorithm to Find Minimum Spanning Trees
, 1994
"... We present a randomized lineartime algorithm to find a minimum spanning tree in a connected graph with edge weights. The algorithm uses random sampling in combination with a recently discovered lineartime algorithm for verifying a minimum spanning tree. Our computational model is a unitcost ra ..."
Abstract

Cited by 142 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a randomized lineartime algorithm to find a minimum spanning tree in a connected graph with edge weights. The algorithm uses random sampling in combination with a recently discovered lineartime algorithm for verifying a minimum spanning tree. Our computational model is a unitcost randomaccess machine with the restriction that the only operations allowed on edge weights are binary comparisons.
Optimal and Sublogarithmic Time Randomized Parallel Sorting Algorithms
 SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING
, 1989
"... We assume a parallel RAM model which allows both concurrent reads and concurrent writes of a global memory. Our main result is an optimal randomized parallel algorithm for INTEGER SORT (i.e., for sorting n integers in the range [1; n]). Our algorithm costs only logarithmic time and is the first know ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We assume a parallel RAM model which allows both concurrent reads and concurrent writes of a global memory. Our main result is an optimal randomized parallel algorithm for INTEGER SORT (i.e., for sorting n integers in the range [1; n]). Our algorithm costs only logarithmic time and is the first known that is optimal: the product of its time and processor bounds is upper bounded by a linear function of the input size. We also give a deterministic sublogarithmic time algorithm for prefix sum. In addition we present a sublogarithmic time algorithm for obtaining a random permutation of n elements in parallel. And finally, we present sublogarithmic time algorithms for GENERAL SORT and INTEGER SORT. Our sublogarithmic GENERAL SORT algorithm is also optimal.
The Accelerated Centroid Decomposition Technique For Optimal Parallel Tree Evaluation In Logarithmic Time
, 1986
"... A new general parallel algorithmic technique for computations on trees is presented. The new technique performs a reduction of the tree expression evaluation problem to list ranking; then, the list ranking provides a schedule for evaluating the tree operations. The technique needs logarithmic tim ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A new general parallel algorithmic technique for computations on trees is presented. The new technique performs a reduction of the tree expression evaluation problem to list ranking; then, the list ranking provides a schedule for evaluating the tree operations. The technique needs logarithmic time using an optimal number of processors and has applications to other tree problems. This new technique enables us to systematically order four basic ideas and techniques for parallel algorithms on tree: (1) The list ranking problem. (2) The Euler tour technique on trees. (3) The centroid decomposition technique. (4) The new accelerated centroid decomposition (ACD) technique. 1. Introduction The model of parallel computation used in this paper is the concurrentread exclusivewrite (CREW) parallel random access machine (PRAM). A PRAM employs p synchronous processors all having access to a common memory. A CREW PRAM allows concurrent access by several processors to the same common memo...
Optimal upward planarity testing of singlesource digraphs
 SIAM Journal on Computing
, 1998
"... Abstract. A digraph is upward planar if it has a planar drawing such that all the edges are monotone with respect to the vertical direction. Testing upward planarity and constructing upward planar drawings is important for displaying hierarchical network structures, which frequently arise in softwar ..."
Abstract

Cited by 39 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. A digraph is upward planar if it has a planar drawing such that all the edges are monotone with respect to the vertical direction. Testing upward planarity and constructing upward planar drawings is important for displaying hierarchical network structures, which frequently arise in software engineering, project management, and visual languages. In this paper we investigate upward planarity testing of singlesource digraphs; we provide a new combinatorial characterization of upward planarity and give an optimal algorithm for upward planarity testing. Our algorithm tests whether a singlesource digraph with n vertices is upward planar in O(n) sequential time, and in O(log n) time on a CRCW PRAM with n log log n / log n processors, using O(n) space. The algorithm also constructs an upward planar drawing if the test is successful. The previously known best result is an O(n2)time algorithm by Hutton and Lubiw [Proc. 2nd ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1991, pp. 203–211]. No efficient parallel algorithms for upward planarity testing were previously known.
Parallel Algorithmic Techniques for Combinatorial Computation
 Ann. Rev. Comput. Sci
, 1988
"... this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165.
A Parallel Algorithm for Computing Minimum Spanning Trees
, 1992
"... We present a simple and implementable algorithm that computes a minimum spanning tree of an undirected weighted graph G = (V, E) of n = V vertices and m = E edges on an EREW PRAM in O(log 3=2 n) time using n+m processors. This represents a substantial improvement in the running time over the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a simple and implementable algorithm that computes a minimum spanning tree of an undirected weighted graph G = (V, E) of n = V vertices and m = E edges on an EREW PRAM in O(log 3=2 n) time using n+m processors. This represents a substantial improvement in the running time over the previous results for this problem using at the same time the weakest of the PRAM models. It also implies the existence of algorithms having the same complexity bounds for the EREW PRAM, for connectivity, ear decomposition, biconnectivity, strong orientation, stnumbering and Euler tours problems.
On Parallel Hashing and Integer Sorting
, 1991
"... The problem of sorting n integers from a restricted range [1::m], where m is superpolynomial in n, is considered. An o(n log n) randomized algorithm is given. Our algorithm takes O(n log log m) expected time and O(n) space. (Thus, for m = n polylog(n) we have an O(n log log n) algorithm.) The al ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The problem of sorting n integers from a restricted range [1::m], where m is superpolynomial in n, is considered. An o(n log n) randomized algorithm is given. Our algorithm takes O(n log log m) expected time and O(n) space. (Thus, for m = n polylog(n) we have an O(n log log n) algorithm.) The algorithm is parallelizable. The resulting parallel algorithm achieves optimal speed up. Some features of the algorithm make us believe that it is relevant for practical applications. A result of independent interest is a parallel hashing technique. The expected construction time is logarithmic using an optimal number of processors, and searching for a value takes O(1) time in the worst case. This technique enables drastic reduction of space requirements for the price of using randomness. Applicability of the technique is demonstrated for the parallel sorting algorithm, and for some parallel string matching algorithms. The parallel sorting algorithm is designed for a strong and non standard mo...
Finding Triconnected Components By Local Replacement
, 1993
"... . We present a parallel algorithm for finding triconnected components on a CRCW PRAM. The time complexity of our algorithm is O(log n) and the processortime product is O((m + n) log log n) where n is the number of vertices, and m is the number of edges of the input graph. Our algorithm, like other ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We present a parallel algorithm for finding triconnected components on a CRCW PRAM. The time complexity of our algorithm is O(log n) and the processortime product is O((m + n) log log n) where n is the number of vertices, and m is the number of edges of the input graph. Our algorithm, like other parallel algorithms for this problem, is based on open ear decomposition but it employs a new technique, local replacement, to improve the complexity. Only the need to use the subroutines for connected components and integer sorting, for which no optimal parallel algorithm that runs in O(log n) time is known, prevents our algorithm from achieving optimality. 1. Introduction. A connected graph G = (V; E) is kvertex connected if it has at least (k + 1) vertices and removal of any (k \Gamma 1) vertices leaves the graph connected. Designing efficient algorithms for determining the connectivity of graphs has been a subject of great interest in the last two decades. Applications of graph connect...
Parallel Recognition of SeriesParallel Graphs
, 1992
"... Recently, He and Yesha gave an algorithm for recognizing directed series parallel graphs, in time O(log 2 n) with linearly many EREW processors. We give a new algorithm for this problem, based on a structural characterization of series parallel graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Our ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Recently, He and Yesha gave an algorithm for recognizing directed series parallel graphs, in time O(log 2 n) with linearly many EREW processors. We give a new algorithm for this problem, based on a structural characterization of series parallel graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Our algorithm can recognize undirected as well as directed series parallel graphs. It can be implemented in the CRCW model of parallel computation to take time O(log n). In the EREW model the time is O(log 2 n) but the number of processors required improves the bounds of the previous algorithm. 1 Introduction A directed graph G is twoterminal series parallel, with terminals s and t, if it can be produced by a sequence of the following operations: 1. Create a new graph, consisting of a single edge directed from s to t. 2. Given two twoterminal series parallel graphs X and Y , with terminals s X , t X , s Y , and t Y , form a new graph G = P (X,Y ) by identifying s = s X = s Y and t = ...
Derivation of Randomized Sorting and Selection Algorithms
, 1993
"... In this paper we systematically derive randomized algorithms (both sequential and parallel) for sorting and selection from basic principles and fundamental techniques like random sampling. We prove several sampling lemmas which will find independent applications. The new algorithms derived here are ..."
Abstract

Cited by 28 (24 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we systematically derive randomized algorithms (both sequential and parallel) for sorting and selection from basic principles and fundamental techniques like random sampling. We prove several sampling lemmas which will find independent applications. The new algorithms derived here are the most efficient known. From among other results, we have an efficient algorithm for sequential sorting. The problem of sorting has attracted so much attention because of its vital importance. Sorting with as few comparisons as possible while keeping the storage size minimum is a long standing open problem. This problem is referred to as ‘the minimum storage sorting ’ [10] in the literature. The previously best known minimum storage sorting algorithm is due to Frazer and McKellar [10]. The expected number of comparisons made by this algorithm is n log n + O(n log log n). The algorithm we derive in this paper makes only an expected n log n + O(n ω(n)) number of comparisons, for any function ω(n) that tends to infinity. A variant of this algorithm makes no more than n log n + O(n log log n) comparisons on any input of size n with overwhelming probability. We also prove high probability bounds for several randomized algorithms for which only expected bounds have been proven so far.