been a major theme of Joseph Goguen’s research, perhaps even the major theme. One strand of this work concerns algebraic datatypes. Recently there has been some interest in what one may call algebraic computation types. As we will show, these are also given by equational theories, if one only understands the notion of equational logic in somewhat broader senses than usual. One moral of our work is that, suitably considered, equational logic is not tied to the usual first-order syntax of terms and equations. Standard equational logic has proved a useful tool in several branches of computer science, see, for example, the RTA conference series [9] and textbooks, such as [1]. Perhaps the possibilities for richer varieties of equational logic discussed here will lead to further applications. We begin with an explanation of computation types. Starting around 1989, Eugenio Moggi introduced the idea of monadic notions of computation [11, 12]

provide a formal but intuitive way of presenting and reasoning about programs, which is widely used in practice, although in an informal or semi-formal fashion. In this thesis, we investigate categorical models of programming languages based on a graphical presentation. In the first part, we use a graphical presentation of processes to motivate a categorical model of processes which provides process types and constructors similar to those available in categories of graphs. The model is parametrised on a base category of processes, and may therefore be used to model a variety of process calculi or languages. We present a concrete instance of this model, based on the process calculus CCS, and show that it arises as a syntactic category of an extension of the base calculus. In the second part of the thesis, we use a graphical semantics due to Jeffrey to model and prove correct a step in the compilation of higher-order functional programming languages: closure conversion -- a program tra

In the Böhm theorem workshop on Crete island, Zoran Petric called Statman’s “Typical Ambiguity theorem ” typed Böhm theorem. Moreover, he gave a new proof of the theorem based on set-theoretical models of the simply typed lambda calculus. In this paper, we study the linear version of the typed Böhm theorem on a fragment of Intuitionistic Linear Logic. We show that in the multiplicative fragment of intuitionistic linear logic without the multiplicative unit 1 (for short IMLL) weak typed Böhm theorem holds. The system IMLL exactly corresponds to the linear lambda calculus without exponentials, additives and logical constants. The system IMLL also exactly corresponds to the free symmetric monoidal closed category without the unit object. As far as we know, our separation result is the first one with regard to these systems in a purely syntactical manner. 1

Abstract not found

This paper presents an abstraction of Hoare logic to traced symmetric monoidal categories, a very general framework for the theory of systems. Our abstraction is based on a traced monoidal functor from an arbitrary traced monoidal category into the category of pre-orders and monotone relations. We give several examples of how our theory generalises usual Hoare logics (partial correctness of while programs, partial correctness of pointer programs), and provide some case studies on how it can be used to develop new Hoare logics (run-time analysis of while programs and stream circuits).

A note on strong dinaturality, initial algebras

This paper contributes a feedback operator, in the form of a monoidal trace, to the theory of coalgebraic, state-based modelling of components. The feedback operator on components is shown to satisfy the trace axioms of Joyal, Street and Verity. We employ McCurdy’s tube diagrams, an extension of standard string diagrams for monoidal categories, for representing and manipulating component diagrams. The microcosm principle then yields a canonical “inner” traced monoidal structure on the category of resumptions (elements of final coalgebras / components). This generalises an observation by Abramsky, Haghverdi and Scott.

”An equilibrium does not appear because agents are rational, but rather agents appear to be rational because an equilibrium has been reached.[...] The task for game theory is to formulate a notion of rationality.” Larry Samuelson [20, p. 3] Abstract. Game theoretic equilibria are mathematical expressions of rationality. Rational agents are used to model not only humans and their software representatives, but also organisms, populations, species and genes, interacting with each other and with the environment. Rational behaviors are achieved not only through conscious reasoning, but also through spontaneous stabilization at equilibrium points. Formal theories of rationality are usually guided by informal intuitions, which are acquired by observing some concrete economic, biological, or network processes. Treating such processes as instances of computation, we reconstruct and refine some basic notions of equilibrium and rationality from the some basic structures of computation. It is, of course, well known that equilibria arise as fixed points; the point is that semantics of computation of fixed points seems to be providing novel methods, algebraic and coalgebraic, for reasoning about them. 1