Results 1 
9 of
9
The essence of dataflow programming
 In APLAS
, 2005
"... Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure contextdependent computation. In particular, we develop a generic comonadic interpreter of languages for contextdependent computation and instantiate it for streambased computation. We also discuss distributive laws of a comonad over a monad as a means to structure combinations of effectful and contextdependent computation. We apply the latter to analyse clocked dataflow (partial stream based) computation. 1
Representations of stream processors using nested fixed points
 Logical Methods in Computer Science
"... Abstract. We define representations of continuous functions on infinite streams of discrete values, both in the case of discretevalued functions, and in the case of streamvalued functions. We define also an operation on the representations of two continuous functions between streams that yields a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We define representations of continuous functions on infinite streams of discrete values, both in the case of discretevalued functions, and in the case of streamvalued functions. We define also an operation on the representations of two continuous functions between streams that yields a representation of their composite. In the case of discretevalued functions, the representatives are wellfounded (finitepath) trees of a certain kind. The underlying idea can be traced back to Brouwer’s justification of barinduction, or to Kreisel and Troelstra’s elimination of choicesequences. In the case of streamvalued functions, the representatives are nonwellfounded trees pieced together in a coinductive fashion from wellfounded trees. The definition requires an alternating fixpoint construction of some ubiquity.
Monads Need Not Be Endofunctors
"... Abstract. We introduce a generalisation of monads, called relative monads, allowing for underlying functors between different categories. Examples include finitedimensional vector spaces, untyped and typed λcalculus syntax and indexed containers. We show that the Kleisli and EilenbergMoore constr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We introduce a generalisation of monads, called relative monads, allowing for underlying functors between different categories. Examples include finitedimensional vector spaces, untyped and typed λcalculus syntax and indexed containers. We show that the Kleisli and EilenbergMoore constructions carry over to relative monads and are related to relative adjunctions. Under reasonable assumptions, relative monads are monoids in the functor category concerned and extend to monads, giving rise to a coreflection between monads and relative monads. Arrows are also an instance of relative monads. 1
Freyd is Kleisli, for arrows
 In C. McBride, T. Uustalu, Proc. of Wksh. on Mathematically Structured Programming, MSFP 2006, Electron. Wkshs. in Computing. BCS
, 2006
"... Arrows have been introduced in functional programming as generalisations of monads. They also generalise comonads. Fundamental structures associated with (co)monads are Kleisli categories and categories of (EilenbergMoore) algebras. Hence it makes sense to ask if there are analogous structures for ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Arrows have been introduced in functional programming as generalisations of monads. They also generalise comonads. Fundamental structures associated with (co)monads are Kleisli categories and categories of (EilenbergMoore) algebras. Hence it makes sense to ask if there are analogous structures for Arrows. In this short note we shall take first steps in this direction, and identify for instance the Freyd
Categorical Views on Computations on Trees (Extended Abstract)
"... Abstract. Computations on trees form a classical topic in computing. These computations can be described in terms of machines (typically called tree transducers), or in terms of functions. This paper focuses on three flavors of bottomup computations, of increasing generality. It brings categorical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Computations on trees form a classical topic in computing. These computations can be described in terms of machines (typically called tree transducers), or in terms of functions. This paper focuses on three flavors of bottomup computations, of increasing generality. It brings categorical clarity by identifying a category of tree transducers together with two different behavior functors. The first sends a tree transducer to a coKleisli or biKleisli map (describing the contribution of each local node in an input tree to the global transformation) and the second to a tree function (the global tree transformation). The first behavior functor has an adjoint realization functor, like in Goguen’s early work on automata. Further categorical structure, in the form of Hughes’s Arrows, appears in properly parameterized versions of these structures. 1
Monad Transformers as Monoid Transformers
"... The incremental approach to modular monadic semantics constructs complex monads by using monad transformers to add computational features to a preexisting monad. A complication of this approach is that the operations associated to the preexisting monad need to be lifted to the new monad. In a compa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The incremental approach to modular monadic semantics constructs complex monads by using monad transformers to add computational features to a preexisting monad. A complication of this approach is that the operations associated to the preexisting monad need to be lifted to the new monad. In a companion paper by Jaskelioff, the lifting problem has been addressed in the setting of system F ω. Here, we recast and extend those results in a categorytheoretic setting. We abstract and generalize from monads to monoids (in a monoidal category), and from monad transformers to monoid transformers. The generalization brings more simplicity and clarity, and opens the way for lifting of operations with applicability beyond monads. Key words: Monad, Monoid, Monoidal Category
MSFP 2008 What is a Categorical Model of Arrows?
"... We investigate what the correct categorical formulation of Hughes ’ Arrows should be. It has long been folklore that Arrows, a functional programming construct, and Freyd categories, a categorical notion due to Power, Robinson and Thielecke, are somehow equivalent. In this paper, we show that the si ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate what the correct categorical formulation of Hughes ’ Arrows should be. It has long been folklore that Arrows, a functional programming construct, and Freyd categories, a categorical notion due to Power, Robinson and Thielecke, are somehow equivalent. In this paper, we show that the situation is more subtle. By considering Arrows wholly within the base category we derive two alternative formulations of Freyd category that are equivalent to Arrows—enriched Freyd categories and indexed Freyd categories. By imposing a further condition, we characterise those indexed Freyd categories that are isomorphic to Freyd categories. The key differentiating point is the number of inputs available to a computation and the structure available on them, where structured input is modelled using comonads. 1
REPRESENTATIONS OF STREAM PROCESSORS USING NESTED FIXED POINTS
, 2008
"... Vol. 5 (3:9) 2009, pp. 1–17 www.lmcsonline.org ..."