Results 1 
6 of
6
Proof synthesis and reflection for linear arithmetic. Submitted
, 2006
"... This article presents detailed implementations of quantifier elimination for both integer and real linear arithmetic for theorem provers. The underlying algorithms are those by Cooper (for Z) and by Ferrante and Rackoff (for R). Both algorithms are realized in two entirely different ways: once in ta ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This article presents detailed implementations of quantifier elimination for both integer and real linear arithmetic for theorem provers. The underlying algorithms are those by Cooper (for Z) and by Ferrante and Rackoff (for R). Both algorithms are realized in two entirely different ways: once in tactic style, i.e. by a proofproducing functional program, and once by reflection, i.e. by computations inside the logic rather than in the metalanguage. Both formalizations are highly generic because they make only minimal assumptions w.r.t. the underlying logical system and theorem prover. An implementation in Isabelle/HOL shows that the reflective approach is between one and two orders of magnitude faster. 1
Generic proof synthesis for presburger arithmetic
, 2003
"... We develop in complete detail an extension of Cooper’s decision procedure for Presburger arithmetic that returns a proof of the equivalence of the input formula to a quantifierfree formula. For closed input formulae this is a proof of their validity or unsatisfiability. The algorithm is formulated ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop in complete detail an extension of Cooper’s decision procedure for Presburger arithmetic that returns a proof of the equivalence of the input formula to a quantifierfree formula. For closed input formulae this is a proof of their validity or unsatisfiability. The algorithm is formulated as a functional program that makes only very minimal assumptions w.r.t. the underlying logical system and is therefore easily adaptable to specific theorem provers. 1 Presburger arithmetic Presburger arithmetic is firstorder logic over the integers with + and <. Presburger [3] first showed its decidability. We extend Cooper’s decision procedure [1] such that a successful run returns a proof of the input formula. The atomic PAformulae are defined by Atom:
Parametric linear arithmetic over ordered fields in Isabelle/HOL
"... We use higherorder logic to verify a quantifier elimination procedure for linear arithmetic over ordered fields, where the coefficients of variables are multivariate polynomials over another set of variables, we call parameters. The procedure generalizes Ferrante and Rackoff’s algorithm for the non ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We use higherorder logic to verify a quantifier elimination procedure for linear arithmetic over ordered fields, where the coefficients of variables are multivariate polynomials over another set of variables, we call parameters. The procedure generalizes Ferrante and Rackoff’s algorithm for the nonparametric case. The formalization is based on axiomatic type classes and automatically carries over to e.g. the rational, real and nonstandard real numbers. It is executable, can be applied to HOL formulae by reflection and performs well on practical examples.
Author manuscript, published in "Computer Science Logic, Czech Republic (2010)" DOI: 10.1007/9783642152054_37 Untyping Typed Algebraic Structures and Colouring Proof Nets of Cyclic Linear Logic ⋆
, 2010
"... Abstract. We prove “untyping ” theorems: in some typed theories (semirings, Kleene algebras, residuated lattices, involutive residuated lattices), typed equations can be derived from the underlying untyped equations. As a consequence, the corresponding untyped decision procedures can be extended for ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We prove “untyping ” theorems: in some typed theories (semirings, Kleene algebras, residuated lattices, involutive residuated lattices), typed equations can be derived from the underlying untyped equations. As a consequence, the corresponding untyped decision procedures can be extended for free to the typed settings. Some of these theorems are obtained via a detour through fragments of cyclic linear logic, and give rise to a substantial optimisation of standard proof search algorithms. 1
INTEGRATION OF DECISION PROCEDURES INTO HIGHORDER INTERACTIVE PROVERS
, 2006
"... An efficient proof assistant uses a wide range of decision procedures, including automatic verification of validity of arithmetical formulas with linear terms. Since the final product of a proof assistant is a formalized and verified proof, it prompts an additional task of building proofs of formula ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
An efficient proof assistant uses a wide range of decision procedures, including automatic verification of validity of arithmetical formulas with linear terms. Since the final product of a proof assistant is a formalized and verified proof, it prompts an additional task of building proofs of formulas, which validity is established by such a decision procedure. We present an implementation of several decision procedures for arithmetical formulas with linear terms in the MetaPRL proof assistant in a way that provides formal proofs of formulas found valid by those procedures. We also present an implementation of a theorem prover for the logic of justified common knowledge S4 J n introduced in [Artemov, 2004]. This system captures the notion of justified common knowledge, which is free of some of the deficiencies of the usual common knowledge operator, and is yet sufficient for the analysis of epistemic problems where common knowledge has been traditionally applied. In particular, S4 J n enjoys cutelimination, which introduces the possibility of automatic proof search in the logic of common