Results 1 -
2 of
2
Conceptual modeling of styles for mobile systems: A layered approach based on graph transformation
- In Proc.of IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems(MOBIS
, 2004
"... Abstract When designing a mobile application, we have to be aware of the properties and facilities of the target platform. At a conceptual level, this platform can be specified by a style, defining the structures and operations available to applications. In this paper, we use a UML-like meta model f ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 3 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract When designing a mobile application, we have to be aware of the properties and facilities of the target platform. At a conceptual level, this platform can be specified by a style, defining the structures and operations available to applications. In this paper, we use a UML-like meta model for the structural aspect and graph transformation rules over its instances to specify the dynamics of a style of mobile systems. The model is layered to separate clearly the software from the hardware and the geographic view of the system.
A Heterogeneous Approach to UML Semantics ⋆
"... Abstract. UML models consist of several diagrams of different types describing different views of a software system ranging from specifications of the static system structure to descriptions of system snapshots and dynamic behaviour. In this paper a heterogeneous approach to the semantics of UML is ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. UML models consist of several diagrams of different types describing different views of a software system ranging from specifications of the static system structure to descriptions of system snapshots and dynamic behaviour. In this paper a heterogeneous approach to the semantics of UML is proposed where each diagram type can be described in its “natural ” semantics, and the relations between diagram types are expressed by appropriate translations. More formally, the UML family of diagram types is represented as a “heterogeneous institution environment”: each diagram type is described as an appropriate institution where typically the data structures occurring in a diagram are represented by signature elements whereas the relationships between data and the dynamic behaviour of objects are captured by sentences; in several cases, the diagrams are themselves the sentences. The relationship between two diagram types is described by a socalled institution comorphism, and in case no institution comorphism exists, by a co-span of such comorphisms. Consistency conditions between different diagrams are derived from the comorphism translations. This heterogeneous semantic approach to UML is illustrated by several example diagram types including class diagrams, OCL, and interaction diagrams. 1

